Kearny (KS) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Kearny (KS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Kearny (KS)
935
Total Investors in Kearny (KS)
908
Investor Owned SFR in Kearny (KS)
661(70.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
855
SFR Owned
589
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
53
SFR Owned
72
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 661 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Investor-Saturated Kearny County: 70.7% of Homes are Investor-Owned in a Market with Zero Q4 Sales
Investors own a commanding 70.7% of the Single-Family Residential market in Kearny County, KS, with small, individual landlords controlling 95.3% of that portfolio. This mature, buy-and-hold market is characterized by 100% cash ownership and a complete absence of institutional investors. The market's stability was starkly highlighted in Q4 2025, which saw zero property transactions by investors or homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own a staggering 70.7% of homes, with individuals holding 89.1% of them.
All 661 investor-owned properties are held free and clear, with zero financed properties recorded. The entire portfolio of 661 properties is classified as rented, indicating a market exclusively focused on rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No landlord or homeowner sales were recorded in Q4 2025, preventing any price comparison.
The complete absence of transaction data for the quarter indicates a highly illiquid market. No pricing trends or landlord-versus-homeowner discounts can be analyzed due to the lack of sales activity.
Current Quarter Purchases
The investor purchase market was completely dormant in Q4 2025, with zero properties acquired.
With 0 total SFR purchases in the market, landlords accounted for 0.0% of activity. This inactivity was universal, with both mom-and-pop (Tiers 01-04) and institutional (Tier 09) investors recording zero acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate, controlling 95.3% of all investor-owned residential properties.
Single-property landlords are the bedrock of the market, owning 554 properties, which constitutes 81.2% of all investor holdings. In contrast, institutional investors have zero presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a key professionalization point.
While individuals overwhelmingly own smaller portfolios, making up 92.6% of the single-property tier, companies represent 53.3% of ownership in the 6-10 property tier. No pricing data is available to compare acquisition strategies.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is hyper-concentrated in two zip codes, with rates exceeding 70%.
The zip code 67838 (Deerfield) has the county's highest investor penetration rate at 72.5%. The zip code 67860 (Lakin) contains the largest number of investor-owned homes at 519.
Historical Transactions
No historical transaction data is available, suggesting a market of long-term holds with minimal turnover.
The absence of data prevents any analysis of buy/sell ratios, landlord-to-landlord transactions, or price appreciation over time. It is impossible to determine if landlords have been net buyers or sellers historically.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords had a 0.0% share of market transactions in Q4 2025, reflecting zero sales activity.
The transaction freeze was total, with zero activity recorded across any investor tier. Consequently, no comparison of purchase prices or strategies between mom-and-pop and larger investors is possible for the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own a staggering 70.7% of homes, with individuals holding 89.1% of them.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Kearny County, KS is exceptionally high, with landlords holding 661 of the 935 total SFR properties, a market penetration of 70.7%.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by 855 individual investors, who own 589 properties, making up 89.1% of the investor-owned housing stock. In contrast, 53 companies own the remaining 72 properties (10.9%).

A defining characteristic of this market is its complete lack of leverage. All 661 investor-owned properties are owned outright with cash, with zero properties recorded as being financed.

The portfolio is entirely geared towards rental income, with 100% of the 661 properties classified as non-owner-occupied or rented.

This data paints a picture of a mature, stable rental market comprised of unleveraged, individual investors who are likely focused on long-term cash flow rather than speculative appreciation.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No landlord or homeowner sales were recorded in Q4 2025, preventing any price comparison.
Detailed Findings

The real estate market in Kearny County, KS showed no sales activity in the final quarter of 2025, with zero transactions recorded for either landlords or traditional homeowners.

This lack of sales data makes it impossible to compare acquisition prices between investor and non-investor buyers or to establish a current market price trend.

The only available historical data point is an average price of $161,305 from the 2020-2023 period, but with zero properties associated with this average, its utility is limited.

The absence of transactions suggests a market characterized by long-term holds where properties rarely come up for sale.

Consequently, analysis of price appreciation, market momentum, or strategic pricing differences between buyer types is not feasible for this period.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
The investor purchase market was completely dormant in Q4 2025, with zero properties acquired.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity in Kearny County, KS came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring zero SFR properties.

This inactivity mirrored the broader market, which also recorded a total of 0 SFR purchases during the quarter, giving landlords a 0.0% market share of a non-existent market.

No new landlords entered the market, and no existing investors expanded their portfolios, as evidenced by zero purchases in the single-property tier.

The lack of acquisitions was consistent across all investor sizes; mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) and institutional investors (1000+ properties) both purchased 0 homes.

This data points to an exceptionally stable or stagnant market, where the high rate of existing investor ownership is met with virtually no turnover or new investment activity.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate, controlling 95.3% of all investor-owned residential properties.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Kearny County, KS is the definitive example of a mom-and-pop market, with landlords owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) controlling a combined 95.3% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Ownership is highly concentrated at the smallest scale, as single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone own 554 properties, representing 81.2% of the entire investor portfolio.

The next largest tiers are also small, with two-property owners holding 7.3% and those with 3-5 properties holding 4.5%.

There is a complete absence of large-scale institutional ownership. Investors in the 1000+ property tier (Tier 09) own zero properties, reinforcing the market's local, small-scale character.

The largest local portfolio consists of a single entity in the 51-100 property tier, which owns just one property in this county, further highlighting the lack of large, consolidated holdings.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a key professionalization point.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of the market, owning 92.6% of single-property portfolios (513 properties) and 92.0% of two-property portfolios (46 properties).

A clear shift in ownership structure occurs as portfolios grow. In the 6-10 property tier, companies become the majority owners, holding 53.3% of the properties (8 properties) compared to 46.7% for individuals.

This crossover point indicates a trend toward professionalization, where investors with larger holdings are more likely to operate under a corporate entity rather than as individuals.

Even in the 11-20 property tier, individuals maintain a strong presence, owning 20 properties (66.7%), suggesting that incorporation is a strategic choice rather than a necessity for mid-size landlords in this market.

Due to the lack of transaction data, it's impossible to compare acquisition prices or strategies between individual and company owners within these tiers.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is hyper-concentrated in two zip codes, with rates exceeding 70%.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Kearny County is not evenly distributed but is instead highly concentrated in specific communities. The zip code 67860 (Lakin) is the epicenter of investor ownership, with 519 landlord-owned SFRs.

The highest rate of investor penetration is found in 67838 (Deerfield), where landlords own 140 properties, accounting for 72.5% of the area's SFR housing stock.

The 67860 zip code also shows a remarkable concentration, with its 519 investor properties representing 70.2% of its total SFRs.

One smaller zip code, 67857 (Hartland), shows a 100.0% investor ownership rate, though this is based on a very small sample of just 2 properties.

This geographic clustering indicates that investor strategy has targeted specific local areas, leading to an exceptionally high density of rental properties within those boundaries.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
No historical transaction data is available, suggesting a market of long-term holds with minimal turnover.
Detailed Findings

A complete lack of historical transaction data for Kearny County, KS, makes it impossible to analyze long-term investor behavior regarding buying and selling.

Key metrics such as the buy/sell ratio, which determines if investors are in an accumulation or disposition phase, cannot be calculated.

Analysis of inter-landlord trading is also not possible. There is no data to show what percentage of transactions occur between existing investors, a key indicator of market liquidity and sophistication.

Similarly, comparing average buy prices to sell prices over time to infer potential profit margins cannot be performed.

This data gap is itself an insight, strongly suggesting that the local market is characterized by a buy-and-hold strategy where properties are rarely sold, resulting in too few transactions to create a meaningful historical record.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords had a 0.0% share of market transactions in Q4 2025, reflecting zero sales activity.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 was marked by a complete lack of real estate transactions in Kearny County, KS, with a total of 0 sales recorded.

As a result, landlords' share of the market was 0.0%, as there were no transactions in which to participate.

Transaction volume was zero across all investor tiers, from single-property owners to the largest landlords in the market.

Due to the absence of sales, no analysis of Q4 purchase prices by tier can be conducted. It is impossible to determine which tiers might pay more or less for properties.

Furthermore, with no purchases, there was no inter-landlord trading activity, meaning no investors sold properties to other investors during the quarter.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Kearny County's Housing Market: 71% Investor-Owned and Dominated by Mom-and-Pop Landlords Amid a Q4 Sales Freeze
Holdings
In Kearny County, KS, landlords own 661 Single-Family Residential properties, representing a massive 70.7% of the total market. The ownership is dominated by individual investors, who hold 589 of these properties (89.1%), while companies own the remaining 72 (10.9%).
Pricing
No sales were recorded for either landlords or traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, making a direct price comparison for the period impossible and highlighting the market's low liquidity.
Activity
The real estate market was at a standstill in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 0 properties, which is 0.0% of all sales. Consequently, no new landlords entered the market during the quarter.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) exercise overwhelming control, owning 95.3% of all investor-held housing. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero presence in this market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners (53.3%) once a portfolio reaches the 6-10 property tier, marking a key point of professionalization.
Transactions
With zero buys and zero sells recorded in Q4 2025, the net position for all landlords, including institutional investors, was neutral. The lack of transactions signifies a buy-and-hold-focused market.
Market Narrative

The Single-Family Residential market in Kearny County, KS is defined by an extraordinary level of investor saturation, with landlords owning 661 homes, or 70.7% of the entire market. This landscape is overwhelmingly shaped by small, local players; 'mom-and-pop' investors (1-10 properties) control 95.3% of the rental stock, while institutional capital is entirely absent. Ownership is primarily individual (89.1% of properties), and notably, the entire investor portfolio is owned outright with cash, indicating a stable, unleveraged, and mature rental market.

Investor behavior is characterized by a distinct long-term, buy-and-hold strategy. This was starkly evident in Q4 2025, when the market saw zero property transactions from any buyer type—investor or homeowner. This lack of activity prevents any analysis of pricing advantages or recent trends but serves as a powerful indicator of the market's illiquidity. The ownership structure shows a clear pattern of professionalization, with investors tending to incorporate as their portfolios grow beyond six properties.

The key takeaway from Kearny County is a portrait of a saturated, stable, and static rental ecosystem. The high penetration of cash-heavy, small-scale landlords has created a market where properties are valued for long-term income and rarely trade hands. For the local housing market, this implies a limited supply of homes for sale to traditional buyers and a rental market controlled almost exclusively by small, independent operators rather than large corporations.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 05:23 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyKearny (KS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct