Doniphan (KS) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Doniphan (KS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Doniphan (KS)
1,897
Total Investors in Doniphan (KS)
938
Investor Owned SFR in Doniphan (KS)
730(38.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
882
SFR Owned
637
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
56
SFR Owned
95
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 730 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Doniphan County's Investor Market: High 38.5% Ownership, Dominated by All-Cash Landlords Amid a Frozen Transaction Market
Investors own a significant 38.5% of Single-Family Residential properties in Doniphan County, with small 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling an overwhelming 96.4% of this portfolio. The market is defined by all-cash holdings and a complete lack of sales activity in Q4 2025, indicating a stable, hold-oriented investor base with zero institutional presence.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 730 SFRs (38.5% of the market), with individuals holding a dominant 87.3% share.
The local investor market operates entirely on cash, with 100% of the 730 investor-owned properties held without financing. Nearly all properties (721 of 730) are actively rented, underscoring a strong rental focus.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No Q4 2025 transaction data is available, preventing a price comparison between landlords and homeowners.
The absence of any recorded SFR purchases by either landlords or homeowners in Q4 2025 indicates a completely stalled market. This lack of activity makes it impossible to determine current pricing trends or assess any potential discount for investors.
Current Quarter Purchases
The investor purchase market was frozen in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0.0% of all properties.
There were zero total SFR purchases in Doniphan County in Q4 2025, meaning no new properties were acquired by any investor tier. Both mom-and-pop and institutional purchase volumes were zero, indicating a market-wide pause in activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 96.4% of Doniphan County's investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 74.2% of all investor housing, highlighting an extremely fragmented ownership base. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have absolutely no presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
No Q4 pricing data is available to compare individual and company buyers due to zero market activity.
Individual investors maintain majority ownership across all tiers, never ceding control to companies. Even in the 6-10 property tier, individuals own 61.5% of the properties, demonstrating their dominance at every scale within the county.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated in specific zip codes like 66024, which has an 82.9% investor ownership rate.
Investor ownership is not evenly distributed, with other key areas including 66094 (52.0% rate) and 66035 (41.8% rate). The zip code with the highest count of investor-owned properties is 66087, with 205 properties.
Historical Transactions
No historical transaction data is available, preventing analysis of landlord-to-landlord sales or net buyer status.
The absence of buy/sell transaction records for any historical timeframe means market liquidity and churn cannot be measured. It is impossible to determine if landlords have historically been net buyers or sellers or to compare acquisition and disposition prices.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 0.0% of transactions in Q4 2025, as no sales were recorded in the county.
With zero transactions, no comparison can be made between institutional and mom-and-pop pricing. There was no inter-landlord trading activity, reflecting a completely illiquid quarter for the investor market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 730 SFRs (38.5% of the market), with individuals holding a dominant 87.3% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a substantial 38.5% of the Single-Family Residential market in Doniphan County, totaling 730 properties out of 1,897.

Individual 'mom-and-pop' investors are the backbone of the market, owning 637 properties, which constitutes a commanding 87.3% of the entire investor-owned portfolio, compared to just 13.0% (95 properties) held by companies.

A striking feature of this market is its complete lack of leverage; 100% of the 730 investor-owned properties are held as cash assets, with zero properties recorded as financed.

The investor base consists of 938 distinct landlords, with individual entities (882) outnumbering company entities (56) by nearly 16 to 1, reinforcing the small-scale nature of ownership.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rental income, with 721 of the 730 properties classified as rented, demonstrating a clear buy-and-hold rental strategy among local landlords.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No Q4 2025 transaction data is available, preventing a price comparison between landlords and homeowners.
Detailed Findings

The real estate market in Doniphan County experienced a complete halt in activity during Q4 2025, with no recorded purchases for either landlords or traditional homeowners.

Due to the zero-transaction environment, it is not possible to establish an average acquisition price for the quarter or analyze the typical price gap between investors and homeowners.

This lack of liquidity is the most significant pricing insight, suggesting that the market is either highly stable with few properties being listed or is experiencing a slowdown where buyers and sellers cannot agree on prices.

Without recent transactional data, assessing price appreciation or depreciation from previous periods like 2024 or the 2020-2023 timeframe is not feasible for Doniphan County.

The absence of sales prevents any analysis of pricing differences between individual and company investors, who may employ different acquisition strategies in more active markets.

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
The investor purchase market was frozen in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0.0% of all properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor acquisition activity in Doniphan County came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing zero properties out of a total of zero market-wide SFR sales.

The lack of activity was universal across all investor sizes, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (Tiers 01-04) making no new acquisitions during the quarter.

Correspondingly, there was no market entry from new landlords, as the number of single-property (Tier 01) entities making a purchase was zero.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) also remained on the sidelines, recording zero purchases and maintaining their non-existent footprint in the county's acquisition market.

This halt in purchasing starkly contrasts with underlying ownership data, suggesting that while a significant rental market exists, it is not currently in an expansionary or transactional phase.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 96.4% of Doniphan County's investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Doniphan County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) owning 705 of the 730 investor SFRs, a 96.4% controlling share.

First-time or single-holding investors (Tier 01) form the largest segment, owning 561 properties, which alone accounts for 74.2% of all investor-owned housing in the county.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) represent a sliver of the market, collectively owning just 27 properties, or 3.6% of the investor-owned inventory.

There is zero institutional investor (Tier 09) ownership in Doniphan County, indicating the market is exclusively served by local and regional players and is not on the radar of large-scale funds.

The ownership structure is highly granular, with the vast majority of properties held in very small portfolios, a pattern consistent with a rural or stable, slow-growth housing market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
No Q4 pricing data is available to compare individual and company buyers due to zero market activity.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners in every single portfolio tier in Doniphan County, showcasing their comprehensive control of the rental market.

Unlike in larger urban markets, there is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners; individuals hold a 93.8% majority in the single-property tier and still retain a 61.5% majority in the 6-10 property tier.

Company ownership is most significant in the 3-5 property tier, but even there, they only account for 38.8% of properties (26 total), failing to surpass individual landlords.

The largest portfolios where companies have a presence (11-20 properties) are still minority-held, with companies owning just 10 properties (47.6%).

This data illustrates a market where corporate consolidation has not occurred at any level, and the growth model remains centered around individual proprietorship.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated in specific zip codes like 66024, which has an 82.9% investor ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Doniphan County is hyper-concentrated in a few key zip codes, rather than being spread evenly across the region.

The zip code 66024 stands out with an extraordinary 82.9% of its SFR properties owned by investors, indicating it is a dominant rental submarket.

Other areas of high investor penetration include 66094, with a 52.0% ownership rate, and 66035, at 41.8%, both significantly above the county-wide average of 38.5%.

The region with the largest absolute number of investor-owned homes is 66087, which contains 205 properties, representing over a quarter of the total investor portfolio in the county.

This geographic clustering suggests that investor strategies are targeted at specific neighborhoods, likely driven by localized demand for rental housing, schools, or other amenities.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
No historical transaction data is available, preventing analysis of landlord-to-landlord sales or net buyer status.
Detailed Findings

A complete lack of historical transaction data for Doniphan County makes it impossible to analyze long-term investor behavior, such as buying and selling trends.

Consequently, there is no way to determine if landlords in this market have historically been net buyers or net sellers, or to calculate a buy/sell ratio.

The volume of inter-landlord transactions, a key indicator of market maturity and liquidity, cannot be assessed.

Similarly, institutional investor (1000+ tier) transaction patterns cannot be reviewed, though their 0.0% ownership share suggests their historical activity has been nonexistent.

Without this data, it's impossible to track how market dynamics, such as buy/sell velocity or pricing, have evolved over timeframes like Q4 vs. Q3 or 2024 vs. 2025.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 0.0% of transactions in Q4 2025, as no sales were recorded in the county.
Detailed Findings

The transactional market for investors in Doniphan County was entirely dormant in Q4 2025, with zero transactions recorded for any landlord tier.

This lack of activity means landlords' share of the market was 0.0%, as the total market itself recorded no sales of single-family residential properties.

No purchase price analysis by tier is possible, as no properties were bought or sold, preventing insights into whether smaller or larger investors pay more.

The market for landlord-to-landlord sales was also frozen, with zero properties being traded between existing investors during the quarter.

This complete absence of transactional velocity suggests investors are in a holding pattern, with neither acquisitions nor dispositions occurring in the final quarter of 2025.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Doniphan County's Investor Market: High 38.5% Ownership by All-Cash Landlords Amid Zero Q4 Sales Activity
Holdings
Landlords own 730 SFR properties, representing a significant 38.5% of Doniphan County's market, with individual investors holding a dominant 637 properties (87.3%) compared to companies' 95 (13.0%).
Pricing
No pricing analysis for Q4 is possible as zero transactions were recorded for landlords or homeowners, indicating a completely illiquid market.
Activity
Investor purchasing activity came to a halt in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0 properties, representing 0.0% of all sales, and no new landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the market with a 96.4% share of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have no presence (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate every portfolio size, never ceding a majority to companies, and they hold 61.5% of properties even in the larger 6-10 property tier.
Transactions
With zero recorded buys or sells in Q4 2025, the landlord market was completely inactive, resulting in no net buyer or seller activity from any investor segment.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Doniphan County, KS, is characterized by high penetration and local ownership. Landlords control a substantial 730 single-family properties, comprising 38.5% of the total market. This ownership is overwhelmingly granular, with individual investors holding 87.3% of the portfolio and small 'mom-and-pop' operators (1-10 properties) accounting for a massive 96.4% share. In a striking display of financial stability or risk aversion, 100% of these holdings are owned outright with cash, as zero properties are financed.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 points to a completely frozen market. There were zero recorded property purchases by landlords, homeowners, or any other party, bringing transactional activity to a standstill. This lack of sales makes it impossible to determine current pricing trends or assess landlord acquisition strategies. The data suggests a market composed of long-term holders focused on rental income rather than transactional gains, with no presence from large-scale institutional investors to drive liquidity.

The key takeaway for Doniphan County is that it represents a mature, illiquid, all-cash rental market dominated by a fragmented base of local landlords. The high ownership rates in specific zip codes, such as 82.9% in 66024, indicate that rental demand is strong but geographically concentrated. The complete halt in Q4 activity signals a stable, hold-oriented market where assets rarely trade hands, a stark contrast to the high-velocity transactional markets seen in more metropolitan areas.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 05:12 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyDoniphan (KS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct