Allen (KS) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Allen (KS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Allen (KS)
4,255
Total Investors in Allen (KS)
1,109
Investor Owned SFR in Allen (KS)
1,172(27.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,026
SFR Owned
941
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
83
SFR Owned
237
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,172 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Allen County's 27.5% Investor Market, But Activity Froze in Q4
Investors own 1,172 single-family homes in Allen County, KS (27.5% of the market), with 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling a massive 87.4% share. While investors were strong net buyers through 2025, purchasing activity came to an abrupt halt in Q4 with zero acquisitions.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,172 SFRs, 27.5% of Allen County's market, with individuals holding 80.3%.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held with cash (997) versus financing (175). Nearly the entire portfolio (1,136 of 1,172 properties) is classified as non-owner-occupied rentals, indicating a pure investment focus.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investor pricing fluctuated wildly, from a 47.9% discount in Q1 to a 27.0% premium in Q3.
The price gap reversed dramatically mid-year; landlords paid $70,756 less than homeowners in Q1 but $42,689 more in Q3. No landlord purchases were recorded in Q4 2025, preventing a current-quarter comparison.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchasing activity in Allen County came to a complete halt in Q4 2025.
Out of 2 total SFR properties sold in the county during Q4, none were purchased by landlords. Consequently, there was zero acquisition activity from mom-and-pop or institutional investors.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 87.4% of investor housing, while institutions own just 0.1%.
Single-property landlords are the largest group, owning 700 properties (58.4%) of the investor-owned market. Institutional presence is negligible, with only one property held by a 1000+ portfolio owner.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 11 or more properties.
While individuals own 93.3% of single-property portfolios, companies control 62.5% of properties in the 11-20 tier and 73.0% in the 21-50 tier. This marks a clear professionalization crossover point.
Geographic Distribution
Iola's 66749 zip code is the investor hub, holding 743 properties at a 28.0% ownership rate.
While Iola has the highest volume, the zip code 66742 in Gas shows the highest market saturation, with investors owning 69.5% of all SFRs. Investor penetration is high across several local zip codes, including 66751 (29.0%) and 66732 (28.1%).
Historical Transactions
Landlords have been strong net buyers, acquiring over 3 properties for every 1 sold in 2024.
In 2024, landlords purchased 78 properties while selling only 25. This net acquisition trend continued into 2025 with 25 buys versus 13 sells, signaling a consistent strategy of portfolio expansion before the Q4 halt.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investor transactions ceased in Q4, with landlords making up 0% of market activity.
No transactions were recorded for any investor tier in Q4 2025. This contrasts with previous quarters where landlords were actively buying and selling.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,172 SFRs, 27.5% of Allen County's market, with individuals holding 80.3%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant footprint in Allen County, owning 1,172 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 27.5% of the total SFR market.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by 1,026 individual 'mom-and-pop' investors who own 941 properties, representing 80.3% of the investor-owned housing stock, compared to just 20.2% (237 properties) held by 83 companies.

A strong preference for all-cash ownership is evident, with 997 properties owned outright versus only 175 that are financed. This suggests a market with low leverage and potentially higher financial stability among landlords.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals, with 1,136 properties (96.9%) listed as non-owner-occupied, confirming the investment-centric nature of these holdings.

On average, company landlords manage larger portfolios (2.9 properties per entity) than individual landlords (0.9 properties per entity), highlighting different scales of operation between the two groups.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investor pricing fluctuated wildly, from a 47.9% discount in Q1 to a 27.0% premium in Q3.
Detailed Findings

Landlord acquisition pricing in Allen County shows extreme volatility, likely due to low transaction volumes. In Q1 2025, landlords secured a massive 47.9% discount, paying on average $76,917 compared to the homeowner price of $147,673.

This trend shifted through the year, with the discount narrowing to 16.5% in Q2, where landlords paid an average of $115,017.

In a striking reversal, landlords paid a 27.0% premium over traditional homeowners in Q3 2025. The average landlord acquisition price was $201,042, a full $42,689 higher than the homeowner average of $158,353.

The complete absence of landlord acquisition data for Q4 2025 indicates a halt in purchasing activity, breaking the year's volatile trend.

This pricing behavior suggests investors may be targeting different asset classes each quarter—from distressed properties at a deep discount to premium assets that command higher prices.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchasing activity in Allen County came to a complete halt in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 marked a total freeze in investor buying activity in Allen County, with landlords acquiring 0 of the 2 SFR properties sold market-wide.

This lack of activity is a significant departure from previous quarters and indicates a potential pause in market expansion by investors of all sizes.

No new landlords entered the market in Q4, as activity in the single-property (Tier 01) category was non-existent.

Similarly, both mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) recorded zero purchases, showing the slowdown was comprehensive across the entire investor spectrum.

This halt could be attributed to a lack of available inventory, unfavorable pricing, or a broader strategic pause by local and regional investors heading into the new year.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 87.4% of investor housing, while institutions own just 0.1%.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Allen County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who collectively own 87.4% of all investor-held SFRs.

First-time or single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, with 700 properties (58.4%) in this tier alone.

In stark contrast, the institutional presence (1,000+ properties) is virtually non-existent, accounting for just a single property, or 0.1% of the investor market. This firmly defines Allen County as a market driven by local, small-scale capital.

Mid-size landlords are also a feature of the market, with those owning 21-50 properties controlling a notable 10.5% share (126 properties), indicating a segment of more established local investors.

The highly fragmented ownership structure suggests a competitive environment for acquisitions and a market deeply rooted in community-level investment rather than large corporate strategies.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 11 or more properties.
Detailed Findings

A distinct crossover in ownership structure occurs as portfolio sizes increase. Individuals overwhelmingly dominate smaller portfolios, holding 93.3% of single-property assets and 87.8% of 3-5 property portfolios.

The shift to corporate ownership begins at the 6-10 property tier, where companies own a substantial 44.8% of properties.

Companies become the clear majority for portfolios of 11 or more properties. In the 11-20 property tier, companies own 15 properties (62.5%), establishing a majority stake.

This trend accelerates in the 21-50 property tier, where companies own 92 properties, a commanding 73.0% majority, signaling a professionalization of operations at this scale.

This pattern indicates that as investment scales, owners are more likely to adopt a formal corporate structure for liability, financing, and management purposes.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Iola's 66749 zip code is the investor hub, holding 743 properties at a 28.0% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Allen County is highly concentrated geographically, with the 66749 zip code (Iola) serving as the primary hub, containing 743 investor-owned properties.

This single zip code accounts for 63.4% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county, though the investor ownership rate there is a more moderate 28.0%.

In terms of market saturation, the 66742 zip code (Gas) stands out with a staggering 69.5% investor ownership rate, indicating it is a market dominated by rental properties.

Other areas also show significant investor penetration, including 66751 (La Harpe) at 29.0% and 66732 (Elsmore) at 28.1%, well above the county average.

The data reveals two distinct geographic patterns: a high-volume investor center in Iola and smaller, high-saturation rental submarkets in surrounding towns like Gas.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords have been strong net buyers, acquiring over 3 properties for every 1 sold in 2024.
Detailed Findings

Historical data reveals a clear and consistent trend of portfolio growth among Allen County landlords, who have acted as decisive net buyers.

In 2024, the market saw significant accumulation, with investors completing 78 purchases against only 25 sales—a buy-to-sell ratio of more than 3-to-1.

This pattern of net acquisition continued throughout most of 2025, with landlords buying 25 properties and selling 13, further expanding their collective footprint in the county.

The most recent active quarter, Q3 2025, showed this trend accelerating, with a 5-to-1 ratio of 10 buys to 2 sells.

This multi-year history of strong net buying makes the abrupt stop in Q4 2025 activity particularly noteworthy, as it represents a sharp break from established investor behavior.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investor transactions ceased in Q4, with landlords making up 0% of market activity.
Detailed Findings

The final quarter of 2025 was marked by a complete absence of landlord-involved transactions in Allen County's SFR market.

With only 2 total SFR transactions occurring in the county, landlords' share of activity was 0%, a stark anomaly given their 27.5% ownership of the market.

This inactivity was universal across all investor sizes; mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and the single institutional-scale owner (Tier 09) all recorded zero transactions.

Consequently, there was no inter-landlord trading, where investors buy from or sell to one another, further highlighting the market's frozen state.

This data confirms that the active, net-buying behavior observed in prior periods came to a sudden and complete stop at the end of the year.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small landlords own 87.4% of Allen County's investor market, which froze with zero acquisitions in Q4 2025.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,172 SFR properties, representing a significant 27.5% of the total market in Allen County. The ownership is dominated by individual investors holding 941 properties (80.3%), while companies own the remaining 237 (20.2%).
Pricing
Landlord acquisition pricing proved highly volatile in 2025, swinging from a 47.9% discount versus homeowners in Q1 to a 27.0% premium in Q3, reflecting a thin and unpredictable market.
Activity
After consistent net buying, investor activity came to a complete halt in Q4 2025, with landlords responsible for 0 of the 2 total market purchases and no new landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The market is fundamentally controlled by small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who command an 87.4% share of investor housing, while institutional investors have a negligible presence at just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the backbone of small portfolios, but a professionalization crossover occurs at the 11-20 property tier, where companies become the majority owners with a 62.5% share.
Transactions
Landlords were strong net buyers through Q3 2025, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 5-to-1 in that quarter, but this accumulation trend stopped abruptly as Q4 transactions fell to zero.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Allen County, Kansas, is a significant and locally-driven sector, with investors owning 1,172 homes, or 27.5% of the total SFR housing stock. This market is defined by its grassroots structure; 'mom-and-pop' landlords (owning 1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate, controlling 87.4% of all investor-held homes. Individual investors own 80.3% of the properties, reinforcing that this is a market of small, local capital, with institutional ownership being statistically insignificant at just 0.1%.

Historically, investor behavior has been characterized by steady accumulation. In 2024, landlords purchased over three properties for every one they sold and continued as strong net buyers through the first three quarters of 2025. However, this long-standing trend of expansion came to a sudden and complete halt in Q4 2025, when landlords made zero acquisitions. This freeze in activity coincided with highly volatile pricing throughout the year, which saw investors swing from securing deep discounts to paying significant premiums relative to homeowners.

The key takeaway for the Allen County market is the contrast between its stable, small-investor foundation and its recent, abrupt paralysis in transaction activity. The market's structure suggests resilience and deep local roots, yet the Q4 freeze signals potential headwinds, such as a severe lack of desirable inventory or a shift in local economic sentiment. This sudden inactivity from a previously aggressive buyer pool could be a leading indicator of changing market dynamics for the entire county.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 05:02 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyAllen (KS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords