Parke (IN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Parke (IN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Parke (IN)
4,711
Total Investors in Parke (IN)
1,072
Investor Owned SFR in Parke (IN)
927(19.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
956
SFR Owned
789
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
116
SFR Owned
143
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 927 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 95.2% of Investor Properties in Parke County as Q4 Market Activity Grinds to a Halt
Investors own 927 Single-Family Residential properties in Parke County, representing 19.7% of the total market. This ownership is overwhelmingly dominated by small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who control 95.2% of the investor-owned housing stock, while institutional investors hold a negligible 0.1%. The market experienced a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with zero properties purchased by investors, following a trend of slowing activity where landlords shifted from strong net buyers in 2024 to a neutral position by mid-2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 927 SFR properties in Parke County, with individual landlords holding a dominant 85.1% share.
Of the 927 investor properties, nearly all are held as either cash or rented properties (897), with only 30 properties reported as financed. Individual landlords comprise 89.2% of all investor entities (956 out of 1,072), reinforcing the small-scale nature of the rental market.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investor purchasing activity halted in Q4, but in Q1 2025 landlords paid 4.7% less than homeowners.
There were zero landlord or homeowner transactions in Q4 2025, making a direct price comparison impossible. The most recent data from Q1 2025 shows landlords secured a modest $3,344 discount compared to homeowners ($68,227 vs. $71,571). The Q2 2025 data shows a statistical anomaly with a landlord premium based on zero actual property sales.
Current Quarter Purchases
The Parke County investor market saw zero purchase activity in Q4 2025, with no new acquisitions recorded.
With zero total landlord purchases, both mom-and-pop (Tiers 01-04) and institutional (Tier 09) investors recorded no new acquisitions. This indicates a complete pause in market entry and portfolio expansion across all investor sizes during the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Small 'mom-and-pop' investors own 95.2% of Parke County's investor-held SFRs, a near-total market control.
Institutional investors (Tier 09) have a negligible presence, owning just 1 property, which accounts for only 0.1% of the investor market. The most dominant segment is the single-property landlord (Tier 01), who alone controls 78.6% of all investor-owned homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
In Parke County, companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 21-50 properties, holding 80% of homes in that tier.
Individual investors overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, holding 89.2% of single-property portfolios and 86.5% of 3-5 property portfolios. The transition to corporate dominance occurs decisively in the small-to-medium tiers.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Parke County is most concentrated in the 47872 zip code, which contains 512 investor-owned properties.
While 47872 leads by sheer volume, smaller zip codes show higher penetration rates. The 47836 zip code has the highest investor ownership rate at 44.4%, followed by 47834 at 38.5%, indicating targeted investment in specific micro-markets.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Parke County shifted from strong net buyers in 2024 to neutral in mid-2025, signaling a market slowdown.
In 2024, landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 23 properties while selling only 5. By Q2 2025, this activity balanced out completely, with 4 properties bought and 4 sold, preceding the total halt in Q4 activity. No institutional transaction data was available.
Current Quarter Transactions
Reflecting a frozen market, landlords were involved in 0.0% of the zero total SFR transactions in Parke County in Q4 2025.
The lack of transactions was universal across all investor sizes, with both mom-and-pop (Tiers 01-04) and institutional (Tier 09) investors recording zero purchases. There was no inter-landlord trading, and no price data is available for the quarter due to the inactivity.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 927 SFR properties in Parke County, with individual landlords holding a dominant 85.1% share.
Detailed Findings

In Parke County, investors hold 927 Single-Family Residential properties, accounting for 19.7% of the county's 4,711 total SFRs.

Individual investors are the backbone of the local rental market, owning 789 properties, which is 85.1% of the total investor portfolio. In contrast, company-owned entities hold 143 properties, or 15.4%.

The ownership structure is similarly skewed towards individuals when looking at entity counts. There are 1,072 distinct landlords in the county, of which 956 are individuals (89.2%) and just 116 are companies (10.8%).

A striking 96.8% of the investor-owned portfolio is classified as rented (897 properties), indicating a strong focus on generating rental income.

Financing appears to be a minor part of the investment strategy in Parke County. The vast majority of properties are held outright as cash or are rented (897), with only 30 properties currently financed.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investor purchasing activity halted in Q4, but in Q1 2025 landlords paid 4.7% less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Investor acquisition activity completely ceased in the latter half of 2025, with zero properties purchased in Q4. This lack of activity prevents a direct price comparison with traditional homeowners for the most recent quarter.

Looking at the last active quarter, Q1 2025, landlords demonstrated a slight pricing advantage. They acquired properties for an average of $68,227, which was 4.7% less than the $71,571 paid by traditional homeowners, a net savings of $3,344.

An anomalous data point in Q2 2025 suggested landlords paid a 56.3% premium ($323,167 vs. $206,753), but this is based on zero properties purchased, rendering the figure statistically insignificant and likely a data artifact.

Historical data shows significant price appreciation from the 2020-2023 period, when the average landlord acquisition price was $189,955, compared to the limited activity in early 2025.

The complete absence of purchases in Q4 2025 signals a dramatic cooling of the investment market in Parke County, a sharp reversal from the active buying seen in prior years.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
The Parke County investor market saw zero purchase activity in Q4 2025, with no new acquisitions recorded.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Parke County came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing zero of the zero total SFRs sold. This represents a 0.0% market share and a halt to all acquisition activity.

No new landlords entered the market in Q4 2025, as indicated by zero purchases within the single-property (Tier 01) category.

The inactivity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) made up 0.0% of the quarter's landlord purchases, matching the 0.0% from institutional investors (1000+ properties).

This lack of activity marks a significant shift from previous periods and suggests a major slowdown or 'wait-and-see' approach from investors in the Parke County real estate market at the end of 2025.

The data reflects a market in hibernation, with no movement in portfolio acquisition for any investor segment during the final quarter of the year.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Small 'mom-and-pop' investors own 95.2% of Parke County's investor-held SFRs, a near-total market control.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Parke County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04, owning 1-10 properties) control a massive 95.2% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the single largest group, holding 754 properties, which represents 78.6% of the entire investor-owned housing stock. This highlights the granular, small-business nature of the county's rental market.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a virtually nonexistent footprint, owning just a single property, which is 0.1% of the total investor portfolio.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08, owning 11-1000 properties) collectively own the remaining 4.7% of the portfolio, indicating a very thin middle market between the smallest and largest players.

This distribution, detailed in CH08-1, shows a market structure built on small, local investment rather than large, corporate ownership, challenging common narratives about institutional takeovers.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
In Parke County, companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 21-50 properties, holding 80% of homes in that tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of Parke County's rental market, dominating the smaller portfolio tiers. They own 89.2% of single-property (Tier 01) holdings and 81.0% of two-property (Tier 02) portfolios.

The balance of power shifts decisively towards corporate ownership as portfolios grow. The crossover point occurs in the 21-50 property tier (Small-medium), where companies own 8 properties, representing an 80.0% majority share.

Even in the 6-10 property tier, company ownership becomes more significant, holding a 39.3% share (11 properties), a substantial increase from the 10.8% share they hold in the single-property tier.

This pattern, illustrated in CH09-1, indicates a clear strategic difference: individuals are the primary entry-level and small-portfolio investors, while scaling a portfolio beyond 20 properties in Parke County is predominantly a corporate activity.

While individuals maintain a presence even in the 11-20 property tier (holding 55.0%), the trend shows that significant portfolio growth is strongly correlated with a shift from individual to company ownership structure.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Parke County is most concentrated in the 47872 zip code, which contains 512 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership in Parke County is highly concentrated. The 47872 zip code is the epicenter of activity by volume, with 512 investor-owned properties, representing a significant 21.1% ownership rate.

However, the highest market penetration occurs in smaller areas. The 47836 zip code has an investor ownership rate of 44.4%, and 47834 follows closely with 38.5%, suggesting these areas are particularly attractive for rental investment.

The top five regions by investor property count are rounded out by 47862 (99 properties, 20.7% rate) and 47874 (91 properties, 11.9% rate), showing a clear focus on a handful of zip codes.

This distinction between high-volume areas (like 47872) and high-percentage areas (like 47836) highlights different investment dynamics within the county, as shown in CH10-1 and CH10-2.

Data for zip codes 46175 and 47805 was not available, but the existing data points to a pattern of clustered investment rather than a diffuse presence across the entire county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Parke County shifted from strong net buyers in 2024 to neutral in mid-2025, signaling a market slowdown.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data reveals a clear cooling trend in Parke County's investor market. In 2024, landlords were decisively net buyers with a 4.6x buy-to-sell ratio, purchasing 23 properties and selling only 5.

This momentum dissipated through 2025. While the full year 2025 still shows a net buyer position (7 buys vs. 4 sells), the quarterly data tells a more nuanced story of a market grinding to a halt.

The trend is most evident in Q2 2025, where activity reached equilibrium with 4 buy transactions perfectly matched by 4 sell transactions. This neutral stance was a precursor to the complete stop in market activity observed in Q4.

The slowdown from aggressive accumulation in 2024 to a balanced market in mid-2025, and finally to zero activity, suggests investors have adopted a cautious, hands-off approach to the Parke County market.

There was no recorded transaction activity for institutional investors (1000+ tier) in the provided timeframes, consistent with their minimal ownership presence in the county.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Reflecting a frozen market, landlords were involved in 0.0% of the zero total SFR transactions in Parke County in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Q4 2025 was a period of complete transactional inactivity for Parke County investors, with landlords participating in 0 of the 0 total SFR transactions, for a 0.0% market share.

This market-wide pause affected every investor tier equally. Transaction volume was zero for single-property landlords (Tier 01) all the way up to institutional investors (Tier 09).

Consequently, there was no inter-landlord trading activity during the quarter. The percentage of properties bought from other landlords was 0%, as no acquisitions occurred.

Due to the absence of transactions, it is not possible to analyze purchase price variations between tiers for Q4. The average purchase price for all tiers was $0.

This data indicates a collective decision by the investor community to pause acquisitions in Parke County during the final quarter of 2025, signaling significant market uncertainty or a lack of viable inventory.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Control 95% of Parke County's Investor Market as Q4 2025 Activity Comes to a Standstill
Holdings
Landlords own 927 SFR properties, representing 19.7% of Parke County's market. The portfolio is heavily dominated by individual investors, who hold 789 of these properties (85.1%), while companies own the remaining 143 (15.4%).
Pricing
With zero Q4 transactions, the most recent pricing data from Q1 2025 shows landlords paid 4.7% less than traditional homeowners, securing properties for an average of $68,227 versus the homeowner price of $71,571.
Activity
Investor purchasing activity in Parke County halted completely in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0 properties (0.0% of sales). Consequently, no new single-property landlords entered the market during this period.
Market Share
The investor market is controlled by small landlords (1-10 properties), who own 95.2% of all investor-held housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a minimal presence, owning just 0.1% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are dominant in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 21-50 property tier, where they control 80.0% of the properties.
Transactions
Investor activity has cooled significantly; after being strong net buyers in 2024 (23 buys vs 5 sells), landlords became net neutral by Q2 2025 (4 buys vs 4 sells) before activity stopped entirely in Q4. Institutional transaction data was not available.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Parke County is fundamentally a small-investor ecosystem. Landlords control 927 properties, which constitutes 19.7% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly shaped by individuals, who own 85.1% of these properties. The ownership structure is highly concentrated at the smallest scale, with 'mom-and-pop' investors (1-10 properties) commanding a staggering 95.2% share, while large institutional firms own a mere 0.1%, effectively making them non-factors in the local market.

Investor behavior in Parke County has undergone a dramatic shift, moving from aggressive accumulation to a complete pause. In Q4 2025, landlords made zero new purchases, a stark contrast to the net buying activity seen in 2024. When they were active in early 2025, investors demonstrated a slight pricing advantage, securing properties for 4.7% less than traditional homeowners. This trend of cooling activity, moving from net buying to neutral and then to zero, suggests a market responding to broader economic pressures or a lack of desirable inventory.

The key takeaway for the Parke County housing market is its stability and insulation from large-scale corporate investment. The market's dynamics are dictated by the decisions of nearly a thousand small, local landlords. The recent halt in transactions signals a period of caution and price discovery. This environment is less susceptible to the rapid strategy shifts of institutional capital, but it also reflects a heightened sensitivity among local investors to market conditions, leading to a collective pause in expansion as of late 2025.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 09:08 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyParke (IN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords