Morgan (IN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Morgan (IN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Morgan (IN)
22,879
Total Investors in Morgan (IN)
1,879
Investor Owned SFR in Morgan (IN)
1,925(8.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,569
SFR Owned
1,355
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
310
SFR Owned
578
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,925 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Morgan County's Market as Institutional Activity Pauses
In Morgan County, IN, landlords own 1,925 SFR properties, making up 8.4% of the total market. This ownership is heavily skewed towards small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 85.9% of the rental housing stock. While landlord purchasing activity paused in Q4 2025, historical data from 2024 shows institutional investors were net buyers (+8 properties) even as the overall landlord market was a net seller (-3 properties), signaling divergent strategies.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords hold 1,925 SFR properties in Morgan County, with individuals owning a 70.4% majority.
The majority of investor-owned properties are held free and clear, with 1,523 cash-owned properties versus 402 that are financed. Of the total portfolio, 1,789 properties are classified as rented, indicating a strong rental focus. Individual landlords (1,569) vastly outnumber company landlords (310) by more than 5 to 1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlord purchasing activity halted in Q4 2025, with zero acquisitions recorded against a homeowner average price of $183,725.
This Q4 2025 inactivity marks a significant drop from the 2024 landlord average acquisition price of $217,888. Prior to this pause, prices had already appreciated from the 2020-2023 average of $210,455. The data shows no price comparison is possible for the current quarter due to the lack of investor purchases.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 17.3% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, with mom-and-pop investors accounting for 100% of these purchases.
All 14 landlord purchases in Q4 were made by small investors in the 1-10 property tier, with zero activity from institutional buyers. The quarter saw the emergence of 13 new, single-property landlords, signaling continued interest from new market entrants.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 85.9% of all investor-owned housing in Morgan County.
In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own a notable 6.0% of the investor-owned housing stock. The single-property tier alone represents the largest segment, with 1,141 properties making up 57.0% of all landlord holdings.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners over individuals in portfolios sized at 11-20 properties, marking a clear strategic crossover.
Individuals dominate smaller tiers, owning 86.5% of single-property portfolios and 76.6% of two-property portfolios. In contrast, companies control nearly all larger portfolios, owning a staggering 98.1% of properties in the 21-50 unit tier.
Geographic Distribution
The 46151 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity in Morgan County, holding 873 investor-owned properties.
While 46151 leads by volume, smaller zip codes show extreme investor penetration, with 46125 at 100.0% and 46111 at 19.0%. This highlights a contrast between areas with high raw counts and those with high concentration rates.
Historical Transactions
In 2024, landlords were net sellers (-3 properties), but institutional investors moved against the trend as strong net buyers (+8 properties).
The broader landlord market saw 46 property purchases against 49 sales in 2024, indicating a slight market contraction. In sharp contrast, institutional investors in the 1000+ tier acquired 9 properties while only selling 1, signaling a clear strategy of portfolio expansion.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 14.0% of all Q4 2025 property transactions, with small investors driving 100% of this activity.
All 17 landlord-involved transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors in the 1-10 property tiers. Notably, zero of these purchases were from other landlords, suggesting investors were primarily acquiring properties from homeowners.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords hold 1,925 SFR properties in Morgan County, with individuals owning a 70.4% majority.
Detailed Findings

In Morgan County, investors own 1,925 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 8.4% of the county's total SFR market of 22,879 homes.

Individual 'mom-and-pop' style investors form the backbone of the rental market, owning 1,355 properties, which accounts for 70.4% of all investor-owned SFRs. In contrast, company-owned entities hold 578 properties, or 30.0% of the investor portfolio.

A significant pattern in financing reveals that landlords in Morgan County prefer cash acquisitions, with 1,523 properties owned outright compared to only 402 that are financed. This indicates a market of well-capitalized investors who are less reliant on leverage.

The rental focus of these portfolios is clear, with 1,789 of the 1,925 properties identified as rented, underscoring their role in providing housing supply to the local market.

The ownership structure is dominated by individuals when measured by entity count. There are 1,569 individual landlords compared to 310 company landlords, a ratio of over 5-to-1, reinforcing the small-scale nature of real estate investment in the area.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlord purchasing activity halted in Q4 2025, with zero acquisitions recorded against a homeowner average price of $183,725.
Detailed Findings

A dramatic shift occurred in Q4 2025, as landlord acquisition activity in Morgan County came to a complete standstill with zero properties purchased. This is in stark contrast to the traditional homeowner market, which remained active with an average purchase price of $183,725 during the same period.

This halt in activity breaks from recent pricing trends. In 2024, landlords were acquiring properties at an average price of $217,888, showcasing a significant investment presence in the market.

The lack of Q4 2025 landlord purchases means no direct price comparison with homeowners is possible, a departure from typical market dynamics where investors often secure properties at a discount.

Looking at a longer-term trend, the average landlord acquisition price during the 2020-2023 boom period was $210,455, indicating that prices had appreciated for investors leading up to the recent pause.

The data for all of 2025 shows a consistent lack of landlord buying activity across all four quarters, signaling a potential strategic retreat or a wait-and-see approach from investors in the current market environment.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 17.3% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, with mom-and-pop investors accounting for 100% of these purchases.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 14 of the 81 total SFR properties sold in Morgan County, capturing a 17.3% share of the market's sales activity.

The quarter's acquisition activity was exclusively driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of the 14 investor purchases, highlighting their continued dominance in the local market.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely absent from the purchasing landscape in Q4, acquiring zero properties and reinforcing the trend of a pause in large-scale investment.

New entrants remain a key component of the market. The single-property tier saw 13 distinct entities purchase 10 properties, indicating a steady flow of first-time landlords entering the Morgan County rental market.

The most active purchasing tier was the single-property group, which accounted for 71.4% of all landlord acquisitions (10 properties), further cementing the importance of small investors in driving market activity.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 85.9% of all investor-owned housing in Morgan County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Morgan County is overwhelmingly dominated by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, collectively hold 85.9% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Defying the narrative of a market controlled by Wall Street, institutional investors (Tier 09) own 120 properties, which constitutes a 6.0% share. While smaller than the mom-and-pop share, this is a significant concentration for a single tier.

First-time and single-property landlords are the single largest force in the market. This group (Tier 01) owns 1,141 properties, accounting for 57.0% of the entire investor-owned portfolio, demonstrating the deeply fragmented nature of ownership.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) represent a smaller but vital segment, controlling a combined 5.5% of the investor-owned housing supply in the county.

The data reveals a clear power law distribution, with a vast number of landlords owning a few properties each, while a very small number of larger entities control more substantial, though not dominant, portfolios.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners over individuals in portfolios sized at 11-20 properties, marking a clear strategic crossover.
Detailed Findings

A distinct crossover point in ownership structure occurs as portfolios grow in Morgan County. While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, companies become the majority owners in the 11-20 property tier, holding a 52.9% share.

Individual investors are the primary owners in the smallest tiers, accounting for 86.5% of single-property (Tier 01) holdings and 75.1% of portfolios with 3-5 properties.

The transition to corporate ownership is stark in mid-size portfolios. In the 21-50 property tier, companies own 52 of the 53 properties, a near-total dominance of 98.1%, indicating that scaling beyond 20 properties is almost exclusively done through a corporate structure.

The 6-10 property tier represents a near-perfect balance between ownership types, with individuals holding 50.5% and companies holding 49.5%, acting as the pivot point before corporate ownership takes over.

This pattern suggests that individual investors are key to the entry-level and small-scale rental market, while corporate entities are the primary vehicle for building larger, more professionalized real estate portfolios in the county.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 46151 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity in Morgan County, holding 873 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals a high concentration of investor ownership in specific areas of Morgan County. The 46151 zip code is the clear leader by volume, with 873 landlord-owned properties, representing an 8.8% ownership rate.

Following 46151, the 46158 zip code has the second-highest count with 512 investor-owned properties (7.1% rate), and 46113 has 236 properties (9.5% rate), showing that activity is clustered in a few key areas.

Some smaller zip codes exhibit exceptionally high investor ownership rates. For instance, 46125 shows a 100.0% investor ownership rate, suggesting it may be a small area with specialized housing. Similarly, 46111 has a 19.0% rate, significantly above the county average.

This data illustrates the difference between concentration by sheer volume and concentration by market share. While areas like 46151 have the most investor properties, smaller markets like 46111 have a higher density of landlord ownership relative to their size.

The top five zip codes by investor-owned count collectively demonstrate the geographic focus of real estate investment within Morgan County, providing a roadmap to the most active submarkets.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
In 2024, landlords were net sellers (-3 properties), but institutional investors moved against the trend as strong net buyers (+8 properties).
Detailed Findings

Transaction data from 2024 reveals divergent strategies between institutional investors and the broader landlord market in Morgan County. While all landlords combined were slight net sellers, with 49 sales outpacing 46 buys, institutional players were aggressively accumulating assets.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) demonstrated a clear bullish stance, purchasing 9 properties while divesting only 1, making them net buyers by a total of 8 properties.

This contrast suggests that while smaller landlords may have been taking profits or reducing exposure in 2024, the largest and most capitalized investors saw a buying opportunity and actively expanded their local footprint.

The overall market activity, with nearly balanced buy and sell volumes, points to a period of churn and reallocation of assets among different types of owners rather than a one-sided market expansion or contraction.

This split behavior is a critical market signal, indicating that institutional capital had a different long-term outlook on the Morgan County market compared to the collective sentiment of smaller, local investors during 2024.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 14.0% of all Q4 2025 property transactions, with small investors driving 100% of this activity.
Detailed Findings

In the final quarter of 2025, landlords participated in 17 of the 121 total SFR transactions in Morgan County, accounting for a 14.0% share of market activity.

The activity was exclusively confined to smaller investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for all 17 of these transactions, with no participation from institutional or large-scale investors.

A key finding from the quarter is the source of acquisitions. None of the landlord purchases (0.0%) were from other landlords, indicating that investors were sourcing their inventory from the traditional homeowner market rather than trading assets among themselves.

The single-property tier was the most active, with 13 transactions, reinforcing that new and small-scale landlords were the primary drivers of investor demand during the quarter.

Due to the limited and sporadic nature of purchasing, average price data by tier was unavailable, further highlighting the low-volume environment for investors in Q4 2025.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 86% of Morgan County's Rental Market as Institutional Buying Paused in Q4
Holdings
In Morgan County, IN, landlords own 1,925 single-family properties, which is 8.4% of the total market. Individual investors hold the vast majority with 1,355 properties (70.4%), compared to 578 properties (30.0%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Landlord purchasing activity halted in Q4 2025, with zero acquisitions recorded. This prevented a direct price comparison, though traditional homeowners remained active, purchasing homes at an average price of $183,725.
Activity
Landlords acquired 17.3% of homes sold in Q4 2025, a total of 14 properties. This activity was driven entirely by small investors, including 13 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the local rental market, owning 85.9% of all investor-held housing, while institutional investors (1000+) hold a 6.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 52.9% of properties and scaling up to 98.1% in the 21-50 tier.
Transactions
While the overall landlord market was a net seller in 2024 (46 buys vs. 49 sells), institutional investors were strong net buyers, acquiring 9 properties and selling only 1, showing a clear divergence in strategy.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Morgan County, IN is fundamentally driven by small, individual investors. Landlords own 1,925 properties, representing 8.4% of the county's housing stock. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who control a commanding 85.9% of investor-owned homes. Individual investors own 70.4% of the total rental inventory, reinforcing a market structure built on local ownership rather than large corporations, although institutional investors do maintain a notable 6.0% share.

Investor behavior in Morgan County reveals a market of contrasts and shifting dynamics. In Q4 2025, landlord purchasing activity paused completely, with zero acquisitions, while traditional homeowners continued to transact. This halt followed a period in 2024 where landlords overall were net sellers (46 buys vs. 49 sells). However, a key divergence emerged: institutional investors moved against this trend, acting as decisive net buyers (9 buys vs. 1 sell), signaling a long-term strategic accumulation of assets that differs from the broader market sentiment.

The key takeaway for the Morgan County housing market is its resilience and foundation in small-scale investment, even as larger players operate with different strategies. The entry of 13 new single-property landlords in the last quarter indicates sustained grassroots interest in real estate investment. The market's future will be shaped by the interplay between these dominant small investors and the strategic, albeit currently paused, capital from larger institutional entities, creating a unique and evolving landscape.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 09:03 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyMorgan (IN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell