LaGrange (IN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the LaGrange (IN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in LaGrange (IN)
8,740
Total Investors in LaGrange (IN)
2,193
Investor Owned SFR in LaGrange (IN)
1,643(18.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,005
SFR Owned
1,443
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
188
SFR Owned
227
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,643 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Local Investors Dominate LaGrange County's SFR Market, Acquiring Properties at a 64% Discount
Investors own 18.8% of Single-Family Residential properties in LaGrange County, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 98.2% of that portfolio. In Q4, investors purchased 25.2% of all homes sold, paying an average of 64.2% less than traditional homeowners, and are acting as strong net buyers, signaling continued local accumulation.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,643 properties in LaGrange County, with individuals holding a dominant 87.8%.
Cash is the preferred method of acquisition, with cash purchases (1,462) outnumbering financed ones (181) by more than 8-to-1. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, as 97.8% of investor-owned properties are non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors in Q4 paid 64.2% less than homeowners, securing a massive $243,435 average discount.
The landlord pricing advantage is extremely volatile, swinging from a 32.3% premium in Q3 2025 to a 64.2% discount in Q4 2025. This suggests investors are making opportunistic or distressed purchases rather than receiving a consistent market-wide discount.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 25.2% of all homes sold in LaGrange County in Q4, purchasing 33 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove 93.9% of investor buying activity, acquiring 31 properties. In stark contrast, institutional investors made zero purchases, highlighting the market's complete reliance on small-scale players.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 98.2% of all investor-owned homes in LaGrange County.
The market is almost exclusively comprised of the smallest investors, with single-property landlords alone accounting for 80.9% of all holdings. Institutional investors have a statistically insignificant presence, owning just 2 properties, or 0.1% of the total investor portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals are the primary owners in small portfolios, while companies assume majority control at the 11-20 property tier.
The ownership crossover from individual to corporate control occurs at the 11-20 property tier, where companies own 76.2% of homes. Below this level, individuals are the vast majority, holding 90.1% of single-property portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in the 46795 zip code, which contains 726 investor-owned homes.
While 46795 has the highest volume of investor properties, the 46789 zip code has the highest penetration rate, where investors own 40.0% of all SFRs. Other high-concentration areas include 46771 (32.0%) and 46747 (29.5%).
Historical Transactions
Investors are aggressive net buyers in LaGrange County, acquiring 8.4 properties for every one sold in 2025.
The pace of acquisitions has accelerated significantly, with 168 properties purchased by investors in 2025 compared to 105 in all of 2024. Institutional investors are almost entirely inactive, buying just 3 properties and selling 2 during 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 22.0% of all Q4 property transactions, totaling 45 acquisitions.
Mom-and-pop investors drove 93.3% of all landlord transactions (42 of 45). Single-property landlords were the most active, paying an average of $135,587, while institutions completed zero transactions. Notably, 13.9% of these new landlord purchases were acquired from other investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,643 properties in LaGrange County, with individuals holding a dominant 87.8%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 18.8% share of the Single-Family Residential market in LaGrange County, with a total portfolio of 1,643 properties.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual 'mom-and-pop' style investors, who own 1,443 properties (87.8%), compared to just 227 properties (13.8%) held by companies.

This individual dominance extends to the number of entities, with 2,005 individual landlords making up 91.4% of all investors in the county, reinforcing the local, small-scale nature of the rental market.

Cash is overwhelmingly the method of choice for property ownership among investors. Of the 1,643 properties, 1,462 are owned outright in cash, while only 181 are financed, indicating a well-capitalized investor base.

The investor portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals, with 1,607 of the 1,643 properties classified as non-owner-occupied, demonstrating a clear focus on generating rental income rather than speculation.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors in Q4 paid 64.2% less than homeowners, securing a massive $243,435 average discount.
Detailed Findings

In a striking Q4 comparison, landlords acquired properties for an average price of just $135,587, a 64.2% discount compared to the $379,022 average paid by traditional homeowners. This equates to a raw discount of $243,435 per property.

Investor purchasing power shows extreme volatility, rather than a consistent trend. For instance, landlords paid a 32.3% premium ($462,525) over homeowners in Q3 2025, but secured a 9.5% discount ($312,796) in Q2 2025, indicating that purchase prices are highly dependent on specific, opportunistic deals.

The significant fluctuations quarter-to-quarter suggest that investors in LaGrange County are not participating in the mainstream market but are likely targeting off-market deals, fixer-uppers, or other properties that fall outside the typical buyer's interest.

The number of properties purchased by landlords in any given quarter is very low, with zero recorded for most of 2024 and early 2025, further supporting the idea of sporadic, deal-driven acquisitions over a steady purchasing strategy.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 25.2% of all homes sold in LaGrange County in Q4, purchasing 33 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investors represented a significant force in the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 33 of the 131 total SFRs sold, which accounts for 25.2% of all sales activity.

The market's growth is fueled by new and small investors. Single-property landlords were the most active group, buying 26 properties, which is 76.5% of all investor purchases for the quarter.

Mom-and-pop investors (portfolios of 1-10 properties) completely dominated Q4 acquisitions, accounting for 31 of the 33 properties bought by landlords, a 93.9% share of activity.

In a clear sign of the market's character, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had zero purchasing activity in Q4, underscoring their absence from LaGrange County.

A fresh wave of 36 new landlord entities entered the market in Q4, each purchasing their first investment property, signaling a healthy and growing base of small-scale real estate investment.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 98.2% of all investor-owned homes in LaGrange County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in LaGrange County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) control a combined 98.2% of all investor-owned SFRs, refuting any notion of corporate control.

Ownership is highly concentrated at the smallest tier, with single-property landlords alone holding 1,370 properties, which represents 80.9% of the entire investor portfolio.

Mid-size investors (11-100 properties) are exceptionally rare, collectively owning just 28 properties, or 1.6% of the investor-owned housing stock.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a near-zero footprint in the county, holding only 2 properties. This 0.1% market share indicates they are not a factor in this local market.

The distribution of ownership clearly shows a market composed of thousands of individuals and small businesses, rather than a handful of large-scale operators.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals are the primary owners in small portfolios, while companies assume majority control at the 11-20 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the bedrock of the LaGrange County rental market, owning 90.1% of properties in the single-property tier and 87.0% in the two-property tier.

A clear shift toward professionalization occurs as portfolios grow. Companies become the majority owners for the first time in the 11-20 property tier, holding 16 properties for a 76.2% share.

Even as portfolios expand into the 6-10 property range, individual ownership remains dominant, though the gap narrows, with individuals holding a 53.8% majority.

This pattern indicates that while individuals start and scale their rental businesses, a strategic shift to a corporate structure happens when a portfolio reaches a size that necessitates more formal management, typically beyond 10 properties.

The data shows a natural progression: individuals build small portfolios, and those who continue to scale tend to incorporate their holdings for liability and operational efficiency.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in the 46795 zip code, which contains 726 investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The 46795 zip code is the epicenter of investor ownership in LaGrange County, containing 726 properties, which is 44.2% of the entire investor-owned portfolio in the county.

A key distinction exists between total count and ownership rate. The 46789 zip code has the highest investor saturation, with 40.0% of its SFR housing owned by investors, despite having a smaller absolute number of properties.

Following 46789, other zip codes with high investor penetration include 46771 (32.0%) and 46747 (29.5%), indicating specific neighborhoods are investor hotspots.

The top five zip codes by property count (46795, 46761, 46565, 46746) collectively house a significant majority of the county's rental stock, demonstrating clear geographic targeting by investors.

The data for the 46528 zip code shows no investor-owned properties, suggesting either minimal rental activity or a potential gap in data for that specific area.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Investors are aggressive net buyers in LaGrange County, acquiring 8.4 properties for every one sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in LaGrange County are in a strong portfolio growth phase, consistently acting as net buyers. In 2025, they purchased 168 SFRs while selling only 20, a buy-to-sell ratio of 8.4 to 1.

This net-buyer trend was consistent throughout the year, with Q4 showing 45 buys versus only 7 sells, demonstrating sustained confidence in the local market.

Acquisition velocity has increased year-over-year. The 168 properties purchased in 2025 represent a 60% increase over the 105 properties purchased in 2024.

Institutional investor activity is negligible and does not influence the overall market trend. In 2025, they were marginal net buyers, acquiring 3 properties and selling 2, with some quarters showing neutral activity.

The data paints a clear picture of a market where small, local investors are actively and increasingly accumulating rental properties.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 22.0% of all Q4 property transactions, totaling 45 acquisitions.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a major role in the Q4 2025 market, with their 45 purchases accounting for 22.0% of the 205 total SFR transactions in LaGrange County.

Transaction activity is heavily concentrated among the smallest investors. Landlords purchasing their first property (Tier 01) were responsible for 36 of the 45 investor transactions, representing 80% of the activity.

Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) collectively made 42 transactions, or 93.3% of the landlord total, while institutional investors made none.

There is evidence of a liquid secondary market among investors. Of the 36 properties bought by new landlords, 5 (13.9%) were purchased from existing landlords, indicating a healthy churn of rental assets.

The average purchase price for the most active segment, single-property landlords, was $135,587 in Q4, aligning with the deep discounts observed when compared to traditional homeowners.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small individual landlords dominate LaGrange County, owning 98% of rentals and driving acquisitions with deep cash discounts.
Holdings
Investors own 1,643 SFR properties, representing 18.8% of the market in LaGrange County. Individual landlords hold a commanding 87.8% of these properties (1,443 homes), with companies owning the remaining 13.8% (227 homes).
Pricing
In Q4, landlords secured an extraordinary 64.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $135,587 versus the homeowner price of $379,022—a savings of $243,435 per property.
Activity
Landlords were highly active in Q4, purchasing 25.2% of all homes sold (33 properties). This activity was driven by new entrants, with 36 entities buying their first investment property.
Market Share
The investor market is overwhelmingly controlled by small-scale players, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 98.2% of all investor-held SFRs. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+) have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.1% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the backbone of the market, owning 90.1% of single-property portfolios. A shift to corporate ownership occurs only in larger portfolios, with companies becoming the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier.
Transactions
Investors in LaGrange County are in a strong accumulation phase, acting as net buyers with a buy-to-sell ratio of 6.4 in Q4 (45 buys vs. 7 sells). Institutional investors showed minimal activity, with just 3 buys and 2 sells in all of 2025.
Market Narrative

The Single-Family Residential market in LaGrange County is significantly shaped by local investors, who own 1,643 properties, or 18.8% of the total housing stock. The landscape is defined by small-scale ownership, with individual investors holding 87.8% of the rental portfolio. This structure is further emphasized by the fact that mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 98.2% of all investor-owned homes, while institutional firms (1,000+ properties) have a nearly non-existent presence at just 0.1%.

Investor behavior is characterized by opportunistic acquisitions and steady portfolio growth. In Q4, landlords purchased 25.2% of all homes sold, often at a steep discount, paying 64.2% less than traditional homeowners in the period. This activity is driven by an influx of new market participants, with 36 entities buying their first rental property in the quarter. Furthermore, investors are in a clear accumulation mode, buying 8.4 properties for every one they sold throughout 2025, signaling strong confidence in the local market.

The key takeaway for the LaGrange County housing market is that it is not driven by large, corporate interests but by a robust and growing base of local, individual investors. These investors are well-capitalized, preferring cash deals and are actively expanding their holdings. Their focus on specific geographic areas, such as the 46795 and 46789 zip codes, indicates targeted investment strategies that are shaping the rental landscape at a neighborhood level. This dynamic points to a resilient, locally-controlled rental market poised for continued growth from the ground up.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 08:58 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyLaGrange (IN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions