Dearborn (IN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Dearborn (IN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Dearborn (IN)
13,730
Total Investors in Dearborn (IN)
882
Investor Owned SFR in Dearborn (IN)
767(5.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
737
SFR Owned
595
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
145
SFR Owned
177
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 767 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Dearborn County's Market, Securing 41% Discounts
In Dearborn County, investors own 767 SFR properties, representing 5.6% of the market. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (97.1%), not institutions (0.1%). In Q4, these investors purchased 6.9% of homes for sale, paying an average 41.3% less than traditional homeowners, while institutional players remained inactive.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 767 Dearborn County homes, with individuals holding a 77.6% majority.
Investor portfolios are heavily weighted towards cash purchases, with 648 properties owned outright versus just 119 financed. The portfolio is clearly rental-focused, with 95.2% of investor-owned properties (730 of 767) classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 41.3% less than homeowners in Q4, a discount of $133,941 per property.
The price gap has been volatile; landlords paid a 48.5% premium in Q2 before securing massive discounts in Q3 (48.5%) and Q4 (41.3%). Landlord purchase activity was concentrated in the latter half of the year, with no acquisitions recorded in Q1, Q2, or Q4 of 2024.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 6.9% of all homes sold in Q4, led by new market entrants.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 80.0% of all investor purchases, acquiring 8 of the 10 properties. Institutional investors made zero acquisitions, showing a complete absence from the Q4 market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control 97.1% of Dearborn County's investor SFRs.
Institutional investors have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.1% of the investor-held housing stock, equivalent to a single property. The market is defined by single-property landlords, who alone control 72.6% of all investor-owned homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners once a portfolio exceeds 5 properties.
Individuals dominate smaller tiers, owning 83.5% of single-property portfolios and 77.3% of 3-5 property portfolios. The clear crossover happens in the 6-10 property tier, where companies control 63.0% of the homes.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip code 47018, with a 10.7% ownership rate.
The largest number of investor-owned homes (326) is in zip code 47025, but this area has a lower penetration rate of 4.7%. Conversely, 47001 has both a high count (226 properties) and a high rate (8.6%).
Historical Transactions
Dearborn County landlords are consistent net buyers, acquiring 41 properties in 2025.
Landlords have maintained a net buyer position throughout the past year, with a buy-to-sell ratio of over 2-to-1 in 2025 (41 buys vs. 20 sells). In contrast, the single institutional investor was neutral, with 1 buy and 1 sell.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 5.5% of Q4 transactions, acquiring all properties from homeowners.
Mom-and-pop landlords dominated activity with 10 of the 12 investor transactions. Notably, 0% of investor purchases were from other landlords, indicating all acquisitions came from the traditional open market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 767 Dearborn County homes, with individuals holding a 77.6% majority.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Dearborn County totals 767 Single-Family Residential properties, accounting for 5.6% of the total 13,730 SFRs in the market.

The investor landscape is dominated by 737 individual landlords, who own 595 properties (77.6% of the investor portfolio). In contrast, 145 company landlords hold the remaining 177 properties (23.1%).

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for cash transactions. A substantial 84.5% of investor-owned properties (648 homes) are held free and clear, compared to only 119 that are financed, signaling a well-capitalized investor base.

The primary strategy for investors is clear, with 730 of the 767 properties (95.2%) being rented out, confirming that the vast majority of holdings are intended as rental income assets rather than short-term flips or secondary homes.

The data reveals a dense market of small players, with 882 distinct landlord entities for just 767 properties, indicating a high prevalence of co-ownership arrangements among local investors.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 41.3% less than homeowners in Q4, a discount of $133,941 per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power, acquiring properties for an average price of $190,041, which is a staggering 41.3% less than the $323,982 paid by traditional homeowners.

This price advantage translates to a direct cash discount of $133,941 per property, highlighting a distinct ability among investors to identify and secure undervalued assets in the Dearborn County market.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has shown extreme volatility. After paying a surprising 48.5% premium in Q2 2025 ($491,650 vs. $330,974), investors shifted to securing deep discounts in Q3 (48.5%) and Q4 (41.3%).

The average acquisition price for investors in 2025 ($338,996) was heavily skewed by the high-priced Q2 activity, but this figure is based on a very small number of total transactions throughout the year.

Recent price appreciation trends show a significant jump in landlord acquisition costs from the 2020-2023 average of $158,699, though Q4's average of $190,041 suggests a moderation from the Q2 peak.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 6.9% of all homes sold in Q4, led by new market entrants.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a small but active segment of the Dearborn County market in Q4 2025, purchasing 10 of the 145 total SFRs sold, which represents a 6.9% market share.

The market's growth is driven entirely by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 80.0% of all investor acquisitions, purchasing 8 properties.

New landlords are the primary force, with the single-property (Tier 01) category alone accounting for 70.0% of investor purchases (7 properties), brought in by 9 new entities.

In stark contrast, large institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made no purchases in Q4, highlighting their complete inactivity in the county's current real estate market.

The purchasing activity was highly concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum, with no buying activity from landlords owning between 11 and 50 properties, or those in the 101-1000 property tier.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control 97.1% of Dearborn County's investor SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Dearborn County is unequivocally dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control a combined 97.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, with 579 properties representing 72.6% of the total investor portfolio, underscoring the grassroots nature of local real estate investment.

In sharp contrast to national narratives, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a virtually non-existent presence, owning just a single property, which accounts for only 0.1% of the investor market share.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) also represent a very small fraction of the market, collectively owning just 22 properties, or 2.9% of the investor-owned total.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented market structure where ownership is spread across hundreds of small-scale investors rather than being concentrated in the hands of a few large corporations.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners once a portfolio exceeds 5 properties.
Detailed Findings

A distinct pattern of ownership structure emerges as portfolio sizes grow in Dearborn County. While individual investors form the vast majority of the market, companies take control at a specific inflection point.

In the smaller tiers, individual ownership is dominant. Individuals own 83.5% of single-property portfolios (487 properties) and 77.3% of 3-5 property portfolios (85 properties).

The strategic shift to a corporate structure occurs in the 6-10 property tier. Here, companies own a 63.0% majority (17 properties), while individuals own the remaining 37.0% (10 properties), marking the clear crossover point.

This trend suggests that as operational complexity and liability increase with portfolio size, investors in Dearborn County see a distinct advantage in incorporating.

Even in the two-property tier, individual ownership remains strong at 72.4%, indicating the decision to incorporate is typically delayed until a landlord manages a more substantial number of assets.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip code 47018, with a 10.7% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis of Dearborn County reveals that investor concentration and volume do not always align. The highest rate of investor ownership is in zip code 47018, where investors own 10.7% of all SFRs.

However, the largest raw number of investor-owned properties is found in zip code 47025, with 326 properties, despite this area having a much lower ownership rate of 4.7%.

Zip code 47001 represents a blend of both volume and concentration, containing the second-highest number of investor properties (226) and the second-highest ownership rate (8.6%).

This data indicates divergent investment strategies across the county. Some zip codes attract a high volume of investors in a large market, while others are smaller markets with a much denser saturation of rental properties.

The top five zip codes by investor property count are 47025 (326), 47001 (226), 47018 (63), 47060 (63), and 47032 (33), collectively representing the core of investment activity in the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Dearborn County landlords are consistent net buyers, acquiring 41 properties in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Dearborn County have been a force of steady accumulation, consistently acting as net buyers of residential property. In 2025, they purchased 41 properties while selling only 20, for a net gain of 21 homes.

This trend has been consistent on a quarterly basis, with landlords ending Q4, Q3, and Q2 of 2025 as net buyers, signaling sustained confidence in the local market.

The acquisition pace remained stable year-over-year, with 41 purchases in 2025 closely mirroring the 44 purchases made in 2024.

The behavior of institutional investors provides a stark contrast. The sole institutional-tier entity in the county was neutral in 2025, with one purchase and one sale, indicating a static or divestment strategy rather than expansion.

This dynamic reinforces that the growth in investor ownership across Dearborn County is being fueled exclusively by smaller, local landlords steadily adding to their portfolios.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 5.5% of Q4 transactions, acquiring all properties from homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords participated in 12 of the 220 total SFR transactions in Dearborn County, capturing a 5.5% share of market activity.

New, first-time landlords were the most active group, with the single-property tier accounting for 9 of the 12 investor transactions and paying an average price of $190,041.

A critical finding from the quarter is that 100% of investor acquisitions came from the open market, not from other investors. The data shows 0% of properties were bought from other landlords, meaning investors were buying directly from traditional homeowners.

Transaction volume was heavily skewed towards the smallest investors, as mom-and-pop tiers (01-04) conducted 10 transactions, while institutional investors (Tier 09) conducted zero.

This transactional data confirms that the investor market in Dearborn County is not a closed loop of investors trading assets, but rather a system where small landlords are actively acquiring properties from the general housing supply.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Dearborn County's housing market is defined by small landlords who control 97.1% of rentals and buy at a 41.3% discount.
Holdings
Investors own 767 SFR properties in Dearborn County, representing 5.6% of the total market. Individual investors are the dominant force, holding 595 of these homes (77.6%), while companies own the remaining 177 (23.1%).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 41.3% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average discount of $133,941 per property ($190,041 vs. $323,982).
Activity
Landlords purchased 10 properties in Q4, a 6.9% share of all sales, with activity driven by small investors. This included the formation of 9 new single-property landlords entering the market for the first time.
Market Share
The market is overwhelmingly controlled by small landlords (1-10 properties), who own 97.1% of all investor-held SFRs. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, which serves as the clear crossover point for incorporating.
Transactions
Landlords are consistent net buyers, acquiring 41 properties versus selling 20 in 2025. The county's single institutional investor, however, was neutral for the year with 1 purchase and 1 sale.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Dearborn County, Indiana, is fundamentally a story of local, small-scale enterprise. Investors own 767 Single-Family Residential properties, a 5.6% share of the total housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly in the hands of individuals, who own 77.6% of these homes. The market structure defies the institutional-investor narrative; mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 97.1% of investor-owned homes, while the institutional share is a mere 0.1%.

Investor behavior in Dearborn County is characterized by strategic acquisition and consistent growth. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 6.9% of all homes sold, with 9 new single-property landlords entering the market. Their primary advantage is financial discipline, evidenced by a remarkable 41.3% average discount compared to traditional homeowners in Q4. This purchasing is part of a steady accumulation trend, as landlords acted as net buyers throughout 2025, adding a net 21 properties to their portfolios while institutional players remained dormant or neutral.

The key takeaway for the Dearborn County housing market is its stability and grassroots foundation. The market is not driven by large, absentee corporations but by local individuals and small businesses steadily building small portfolios. These investors provide a significant portion of the area's rental housing, are well-capitalized with a high rate of cash ownership, and are expanding their holdings by acquiring properties from the traditional market. This dynamic suggests a mature, community-integrated investor base rather than a speculative, volatile one.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 08:41 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyDearborn (IN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct