Blackford (IN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Blackford (IN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Blackford (IN)
3,961
Total Investors in Blackford (IN)
729
Investor Owned SFR in Blackford (IN)
612(15.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
647
SFR Owned
517
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
82
SFR Owned
99
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 612 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Command 93% of Blackford County's Rental Market as Q4 Activity Halts
Investors own 15.5% of Single-Family Residential properties in Blackford County, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 93.4% share. While landlords secured massive discounts of nearly 50% earlier in the year, purchasing activity came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025. Throughout 2025, landlords remained net buyers, while the few larger investors were net sellers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 612 SFR properties in Blackford County, with individuals holding 84.5%.
The majority of investor-owned properties are held free and clear, with 522 paid in cash versus only 90 financed. A total of 589 properties are confirmed rentals. Individual landlords outnumber companies by nearly 8 to 1 (647 vs 82).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a massive 49.8% discount vs. homeowners in Q2 2025, paying $71,237 less.
No landlord purchase activity was recorded in Q3 or Q4 2025. The price gap was even wider in Q1 2025, when landlords paid 54.8% less than traditional homeowners. Landlord acquisition prices in 2025 ($62,480) have fallen below both 2024 ($74,857) and the 2020-2023 average ($72,651).
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchasing activity halted in Q4 2025, with landlords making zero acquisitions.
Of the 3 total SFR properties sold in Blackford County during Q4 2025, none were purchased by entities classified as landlords. Consequently, both mom-and-pop and institutional investors recorded zero purchases for the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 93.4% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 78.4% of all investor-held homes, making them the market's foundation. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence in Blackford County, holding 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority at the 11-20 property tier.
In the 11-20 property tier, companies own 66.7% of the homes. Even in the smallest tier (1 property), companies still own 45 homes (9.1%). In the largest local tier (101-1000 properties), individuals surprisingly re-emerge, holding 60% of the properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 47348 and 47359, holding a combined 558 properties.
Some smaller zip codes exhibit extremely high investor saturation, such as 47338, where investors own 80.0% of SFRs. Zip code 47336 also shows a high concentration with a 42.9% investor ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Blackford County were net buyers in 2025, acquiring 15 properties while selling 11.
This net buyer position (Net +4) continues a trend from 2024, which was even stronger with 36 buys versus 15 sells (Net +21). In contrast, the few larger-scale investors (1000+ tier) were net sellers in 2025, selling 2 properties while only buying 1.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investor transaction activity in Blackford County came to a complete stop in Q4 2025.
With zero landlord transactions recorded, there was no purchasing activity to analyze across any investor tier, from mom-and-pop to institutional. This reflects a total market pause for investors at the end of the year.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 612 SFR properties in Blackford County, with individuals holding 84.5%.
Detailed Findings

In Blackford County, investors own 612 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, accounting for 15.5% of the total 3,961 SFRs in the market. This indicates a significant, yet not dominant, investor presence in the local housing landscape.

Individual investors are the definitive backbone of the rental market, owning 517 properties, which constitutes a commanding 84.5% of the investor-owned portfolio. Company-owned properties lag significantly, with 99 homes representing the remaining 16.2%.

A strong preference for unleveraged ownership is evident, with 522 properties (85.3%) held as cash assets compared to only 90 (14.7%) that are financed. This suggests a fiscally conservative approach among local landlords, who prefer to own assets outright rather than leveraging debt.

The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards small-scale operators. There are 729 distinct landlord entities, of which 647 are individuals and only 82 are companies. This nearly 8-to-1 ratio of individual-to-company landlords reinforces the 'mom-and-pop' character of the market.

The primary purpose of these holdings is clear, with 589 of the 612 properties identified as rented. This high rental penetration confirms that the vast majority of the investor-owned portfolio is actively serving as housing for tenants in Blackford County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a massive 49.8% discount vs. homeowners in Q2 2025, paying $71,237 less.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Blackford County demonstrate a remarkable ability to acquire properties at a significant discount. In Q2 2025, they paid an average of $71,667, which was $71,237 (or 49.8%) less than the $142,904 average paid by traditional homeowners.

This deep discount was not an anomaly. The trend was even more pronounced in Q1 2025, when the price gap reached 54.8%. Landlords paid just $48,700 on average, a full $59,104 below the homeowner price of $107,804, signaling a consistent strategy of purchasing undervalued assets.

However, investor purchasing activity appears to have completely frozen in the second half of the year, with zero properties acquired by landlords in Q3 and Q4 2025. This halt in activity followed a period of declining acquisition prices.

A cooling trend in pricing is evident when comparing recent activity to previous years. The average landlord purchase price for 2025 stood at $62,480, a notable decrease from the 2024 average of $74,857 and the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $72,651.

The lack of recent purchase data suggests a 'wait-and-see' approach from investors in the current market, potentially waiting for prices to align with their investment criteria after a period of higher valuations in preceding years.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchasing activity halted in Q4 2025, with landlords making zero acquisitions.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 marked a complete cessation of purchasing activity by real estate investors in Blackford County. Landlords acquired zero of the 3 Single-Family Residential properties that were sold, resulting in a 0% market share for the quarter.

This market-wide pause affected investors of all sizes. 'Mom-and-pop' landlords, who typically dominate acquisition activity, made no purchases, accounting for 0.0% of the non-existent investor buying pool.

Similarly, institutional investors (1,000+ properties), who already have no significant holdings in the county, also made zero purchases in Q4, reflecting the total freeze in investment activity.

The data indicates no new landlords entered the market in Q4, as the single-property (Tier 01) category, a proxy for new investors, also recorded zero acquisitions.

This complete halt in investor buying stands in stark contrast to previous periods of activity and signals a significant shift in market sentiment or a lack of available inventory meeting investor criteria at the end of 2025.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 93.4% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Blackford County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale, 'mom-and-pop' landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively control 93.4% of all investor-owned SFR housing, underscoring the granular, community-level nature of the rental market.

First-time or single-holding investors are the most significant segment by a wide margin. Landlords with just one property own 489 homes, representing 78.4% of the entire investor portfolio. This highlights the market's reliance on individuals rather than large corporations.

The distribution of ownership thins out rapidly as portfolio sizes increase. Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) own a combined 5.8% of the market, while those with over 100 properties hold just 0.8%.

Contrary to narratives about corporate consolidation, institutional investors with portfolios exceeding 1,000 properties have absolutely no footprint in Blackford County, with a 0.0% market share. The local market is entirely driven by smaller operators.

The data reveals a highly decentralized ownership structure, where the vast majority of rental housing is provided by local individuals and small businesses, not by large, out-of-state investment firms.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority at the 11-20 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of the rental market in Blackford County, overwhelmingly dominating smaller portfolio tiers. For single-property landlords, individuals own 447 of the 492 properties (90.9%), a pattern that continues through the 6-10 property tier (66.7% individual-owned).

A clear crossover point occurs once portfolios grow beyond 10 properties. In the 11-20 property tier, ownership flips, with companies controlling 8 of the 12 properties (66.7%). This indicates that scaling operations often coincides with incorporation for liability or financial reasons.

Even in the smallest tier, a corporate presence exists. Companies own 45 single-property holdings, suggesting some investors start their first purchase under an LLC or other business entity.

An interesting anomaly appears at the top end of the local market. For landlords owning 101-1000 properties, individual ownership surprisingly resurfaces as the majority, with individuals holding 3 of the 5 properties (60.0%) in this tier.

This structure suggests a market primarily composed of individual investors, with a small segment of professionalized, company-run operations in the mid-size tiers, and a few high-net-worth individuals managing large portfolios personally.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 47348 and 47359, holding a combined 558 properties.
Detailed Findings

The bulk of investor-owned properties in Blackford County is concentrated in two primary zip codes. The 47348 area leads with 451 investor-owned homes (a 14.5% ownership rate), followed by 47359 with 107 properties (a 14.7% rate). Together, these two areas account for 91% of the county's entire investor portfolio.

While overall volume is low, certain micro-markets show an exceptionally high density of investor ownership. In the 47338 zip code, investors own 8 out of 10 SFR properties, an 80.0% saturation rate, suggesting this area is dominated by rental housing.

Another pocket of high concentration is zip code 47336, where 42 of the 98 SFRs are investor-owned, translating to a 42.9% ownership rate. This is nearly triple the county-wide average of 15.5%.

The data reveals a pattern where investor ownership is not evenly distributed. Instead, it is clustered in specific neighborhoods or towns, creating areas with a much higher percentage of rental properties than the county average suggests.

The top regions by sheer count (47348, 47359) have moderate investor penetration rates around 14.5%, whereas the top regions by percentage (47338, 47336) are much smaller but have a significantly higher proportion of rentals.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords in Blackford County were net buyers in 2025, acquiring 15 properties while selling 11.
Detailed Findings

Despite a halt in Q4, landlords remained net buyers for the full year of 2025, acquiring 15 SFR properties while only selling 11. This net gain of 4 properties signals continued, albeit modest, portfolio growth across the investor community as a whole.

The net buying activity in 2025 represents a continuation of a multi-year trend. In 2024, landlords were significantly more aggressive, purchasing 36 homes and selling only 15, for a net increase of 21 properties to their portfolios.

A stark divergence in strategy is visible between the overall market and its largest players. While the landlord community at large was accumulating properties, the institutional (1000+) tier was divesting. In 2025, these large investors sold 2 properties and acquired only 1, making them net sellers.

This pattern of institutional selling was also present in 2024, when they bought and sold an equal number of properties (2 each), indicating a neutral-to-negative stance on portfolio growth in the region.

The data paints a picture of a market where smaller, local landlords are steadily growing their holdings, while the very few large-scale investors are either reducing their exposure or have ceased expansion in Blackford County.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investor transaction activity in Blackford County came to a complete stop in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 was marked by a complete absence of transaction activity from real estate investors in Blackford County. Out of 3 total SFR transactions in the market, none involved a landlord as a buyer, resulting in a 0% landlord share of transactions.

This inactivity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who are typically the most active, recorded zero transactions during the quarter.

Likewise, institutional-tier investors (Tier 09), who have a minimal presence in the county, also recorded zero transactions, aligning with the overall market freeze.

Due to the lack of purchases, analysis of pricing strategies between tiers is not possible for Q4. The average purchase price for all tiers was effectively $0.

Furthermore, with no acquisitions, there were no instances of inter-landlord trading. The percentage of properties bought from other landlords was 0% across the board, indicating a pause in portfolio exchanges as well as market-wide acquisitions.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 93% of Blackford County's Investor Market as Activity Froze in Q4 2025
Holdings
Investors own 612 SFR properties in Blackford County, representing 15.5% of the market. Individual investors dominate, holding 517 properties (84.5%) compared to 99 (16.2%) owned by companies.
Pricing
While no Q4 data is available, landlords in early 2025 secured properties at a steep 49.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying just $71,667 versus $142,904 in Q2.
Activity
Investor purchasing activity in Blackford County came to a complete halt in Q4 2025, with landlords making zero acquisitions out of the 3 total SFR sales in the quarter.
Market Share
Small-scale 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 93.4% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional-grade investors have no presence (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the backbone of the rental market, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 11-20 properties, controlling 66.7% of homes in that tier.
Transactions
Despite a Q4 pause, landlords were net buyers in 2025 (15 buys vs. 11 sells). In contrast, the market's few larger-scale investors were net sellers, divesting more properties than they acquired.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Blackford County, Indiana is defined by its small-scale, local character. Investors own 612 properties, making up 15.5% of the total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who own a staggering 93.4% of all investor-held homes. Individual investors are the primary players, holding 84.5% of the properties, while institutional investors with 1,000+ homes have zero presence in the county, challenging any narrative of corporate dominance.

Investor behavior in 2025 revealed a tale of two distinct halves. In the first half, landlords were active and demonstrated a keen ability to find value, purchasing homes at discounts approaching 50% compared to traditional homeowners. However, this activity ceased entirely in the fourth quarter, with investors making zero acquisitions. Over the full year, the landlord community remained net buyers, adding more properties than they sold. This contrasts sharply with the county's few largest investors, who were net sellers, indicating a strategic divergence between small and large players.

The key takeaway for the Blackford County housing market is its stability and decentralization. The rental housing supply is firmly in the hands of local individuals, not large corporations. The recent halt in purchasing suggests investors are exercising caution, possibly waiting for more favorable pricing or market conditions. This pause, combined with the continued divestment by larger entities, indicates the market is likely to remain dominated by community-based landlords for the foreseeable future.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 08:36 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBlackford (IN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional