Bartholomew (IN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Bartholomew (IN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Bartholomew (IN)
24,711
Total Investors in Bartholomew (IN)
2,751
Investor Owned SFR in Bartholomew (IN)
2,956(12.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,388
SFR Owned
2,227
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
363
SFR Owned
764
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,956 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Bartholomew County's Real Estate Market, Owning 87.7% of Rental Homes with Cash
In Bartholomew County, investors own 2,956 single-family properties, representing 12.0% of the total market. The landscape is controlled by small 'mom-and-pop' landlords who own 87.7% of this portfolio, in stark contrast to institutional investors who hold just 1.9%. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 22.0% of all homes sold, securing them at a 25.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,956 SFR properties in Bartholomew County, with 100% of them purchased with cash.
Individual landlords own 75.3% (2,227 properties) of the investor portfolio, compared to 25.8% (764 properties) for companies. A striking 95.5% of all investor-owned homes (2,822 properties) are actively rented, indicating a strong focus on generating rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords acquired Q4 properties at a 25.4% discount, paying $74,000 versus the homeowner average of $99,255.
The price advantage for landlords has been highly volatile, peaking at a 54.1% discount in Q3 2025 ($47,500 vs $103,380) and narrowing to just 7.0% in Q2 2025. This fluctuation suggests landlords are capitalizing on opportunistic, below-market deals rather than a consistent market-wide discount.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 22.0% of all single-family homes sold in Bartholomew County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of investor purchases this quarter, with zero activity from institutional-scale investors. The market also welcomed 3 new single-property landlords, signaling continued entry by small-scale investors.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 87.7% of investor-owned SFRs in Bartholomew County.
This small-investor dominance leaves institutional investors with a minimal footprint of just 1.9% of the market (58 properties). Single-property landlords alone make up the largest segment, holding 57.8% of all investor-owned homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier.
In the foundational single-property tier, individuals own 88.2% of homes. The crossover happens decisively at the 11-20 property tier, where companies own 61.6% of the properties, a share that grows to 80.0% in the 101-1,000 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Bartholomew County is highly concentrated, with 70% of all properties located in the 47201 zip code.
While the 47201 zip code has the highest count of investor properties (2,070), smaller zip codes like 47273 and 47274 have the highest density, with investors owning 33.3% and 33.1% of the housing stock, respectively. The next largest concentration by count is 47203, with 500 investor-owned properties.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Bartholomew County are consistent net buyers, while institutional investors are net sellers.
In 2025, the overall landlord market acquired 48 properties while selling only 23, demonstrating strong accumulation. Conversely, institutional investors were net sellers in 2024, the most recent period with data, selling 4 properties while buying only 2.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 19.7% of all property transactions in Q4 2025, with 100% of activity from mom-and-pops.
There were zero recorded transactions by institutional investors this quarter. Notably, none of the 12 landlord purchases came from other landlords, indicating that investors are acquiring properties from the open market rather than trading amongst themselves.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,956 SFR properties in Bartholomew County, with 100% of them purchased with cash.
Detailed Findings

In Bartholomew County, investors hold a significant 12.0% of the single-family residential market, totaling 2,956 properties. This demonstrates a notable investor presence within the local housing ecosystem.

Individual investors are the primary force in the market, owning 2,227 properties, or 75.3% of the total investor portfolio. This is more than triple the 764 properties (25.8%) owned by companies, highlighting that the local market is driven by smaller-scale landlords rather than large corporations.

A remarkable finding is that 100% of the 2,956 investor-owned properties are classified as cash-owned, with zero properties financed. This indicates that investors in this market are exceptionally well-capitalized and not leveraged with debt, providing them significant stability and purchasing power.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rental income, with 2,822 properties (95.5%) listed as rented. This high concentration underscores a clear buy-and-hold rental strategy among Bartholomew County investors.

The entity count further reinforces the dominance of individual landlords, with 2,388 individuals compared to just 363 companies. This nearly 7-to-1 ratio of individual to company entities shows a fragmented market composed of many small players.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords acquired Q4 properties at a 25.4% discount, paying $74,000 versus the homeowner average of $99,255.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Bartholomew County demonstrated a strong purchasing advantage in Q4 2025, paying an average of just $74,000 per property. This represents a substantial 25.4% discount compared to the $99,255 average paid by traditional homeowners, a savings of $25,255 per home.

This price gap between landlords and homeowners has shown significant volatility throughout the year. The discount was an extraordinary 54.1% in Q3 ($47,500 vs. $103,380), but was much smaller in Q2 at only 7.0% ($283,170 vs. $304,361), indicating that landlord acquisitions are likely opportunistic rather than uniformly priced below market.

The Q1 2025 discount was also massive at 46.8%, with landlords paying $146,417 while homeowners paid $275,045. The sharp quarterly differences in average prices suggest that the type and condition of properties acquired by investors vary dramatically from one period to the next.

Overall price trends show a fluctuating market, with the average landlord acquisition price for all of 2025 standing at $185,835. This is slightly higher than the average of $182,706 during the 2020-2023 period, suggesting modest long-term price appreciation in the assets targeted by investors.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 22.0% of all single-family homes sold in Bartholomew County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a significant portion of the Bartholomew County market in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 9 of the 41 total SFRs sold, a market share of 22.0%.

The acquisition activity this quarter was exclusively driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) made 100% of all investor purchases, completely dominating the buying landscape.

In a clear sign of this small-investor dominance, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) made zero purchases in Q4, underscoring their lack of presence in the county's acquisition market.

New entrants continue to fuel the rental market, as 3 new single-property landlords made their first purchase in Q4. This represents one-third of all landlord purchases, highlighting a healthy influx of new participants.

Among active buyers, landlords in the 6-10 property tier were the most acquisitive, purchasing 4 properties (40% of the landlord total), while new single-property investors were next, acquiring 3 properties (30%).

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 87.7% of investor-owned SFRs in Bartholomew County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Bartholomew County is overwhelmingly characterized by small, independent landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (mom-and-pop, Tiers 01-04) collectively control 87.7% of all investor-owned single-family homes, shaping the vast majority of the rental market.

Defying the narrative of corporate dominance, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1,000+ properties) have a very small presence, owning just 58 properties, which accounts for only 1.9% of the investor-owned housing stock.

The most significant segment is the single-property landlord (Tier 01), who alone owns 1,779 properties. This constitutes a majority share of 57.8%, establishing first-time and small-scale investors as the backbone of the county's rental housing supply.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) represent a combined 10.2% of the market. This group bridges the gap between the small mom-and-pop majority and the nearly non-existent large-scale players.

The distribution clearly shows a highly fragmented market, with ownership spread across 2,751 distinct landlord entities, preventing any single large player from exerting outsized influence on rental prices or housing availability.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure in Bartholomew County shows a clear pattern based on portfolio size, with a distinct crossover point where corporate ownership overtakes individual ownership. For smaller portfolios, individuals are the undisputed majority.

In the entry-level tiers, individual ownership is overwhelming. Individuals own 88.2% of single-property portfolios and 73.8% of two-property portfolios, confirming that the path to real estate investment is typically started by private persons, not corporations.

The transition to corporate ownership begins as portfolios grow. The crossover point occurs at the 'Small-medium (11-20)' tier, where companies take a majority stake for the first time, owning 93 properties (61.6%) compared to the 58 owned by individuals.

This trend accelerates in larger tiers. In the 'Small-medium (21-50)' tier, companies own 58.3% of properties. By the 'Large (101-1000)' tier, company dominance is solidified at 80.0%, indicating that scaling operations typically involves formal incorporation for liability and management purposes.

Even so, individual ownership persists across nearly all tiers, including a 60.7% share of the 6-10 property tier, highlighting the sustained presence and success of independent landlords managing sizable portfolios.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Bartholomew County is highly concentrated, with 70% of all properties located in the 47201 zip code.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals extreme concentration of investor ownership within Bartholomew County. The 47201 zip code is the undisputed epicenter, containing 2,070 investor-owned properties, which accounts for 70% of the entire investor portfolio in the county.

While 47201 leads in sheer volume, it has a landlord ownership rate of 15.2%. In contrast, smaller, more rural zip codes exhibit the highest market penetration. The 47273 and 47274 zip codes top the list for ownership rate, with investors owning 33.3% and 33.1% of the housing stock, respectively, indicating a very high density of rental properties in these specific areas.

This highlights a key distinction between investor volume and investor density. The primary urban center (47201) attracts the most investors by count, while smaller surrounding communities have a higher proportion of their homes owned by landlords.

Following the primary hub of 47201, the 47203 zip code is a distant second in volume, with 500 investor-owned properties and a 6.2% ownership rate. This further emphasizes the singular focus on the 47201 area.

Other areas with notable investor presence include 47246, with 128 properties (9.8% rate), and 47226, with an 18.0% ownership rate, showcasing pockets of investor activity outside the main concentration zone.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Bartholomew County are consistent net buyers, while institutional investors are net sellers.
Detailed Findings

The overall transaction trend for landlords in Bartholomew County points toward consistent portfolio growth. Across 2025, landlords have been strong net buyers, acquiring 48 properties and selling only 23, resulting in a net gain of 25 properties.

This net buyer behavior was also present in 2024, although at a slower pace, with 62 buys and 54 sells for a net gain of 8 properties. The trend shows an acceleration of accumulation in the current year.

A critical divergence in strategy is evident when isolating institutional investors (1,000+ properties). In 2024, this tier was a net seller, divesting 4 properties while only acquiring 2. This signals a retreat from the market by large-scale players, contrasting sharply with the accumulation strategy of smaller landlords.

The data from Q2 2025 further confirms the net buying trend, with 14 properties purchased versus 13 sold. This continuous, albeit sometimes narrow, margin of buying over selling reinforces the long-term growth pattern of the local investor base.

The divergence between the broader market's accumulation and the institutional tier's divestment suggests that market dynamics are being shaped from the bottom up by local and regional investors, not top-down by national corporations.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 19.7% of all property transactions in Q4 2025, with 100% of activity from mom-and-pops.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords participated in 12 of the 61 total SFR transactions in Bartholomew County, capturing a 19.7% share of all market activity. This demonstrates sustained and active participation by investors in the local real estate market.

Transaction activity was entirely concentrated among small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for all 12 landlord transactions, while institutional investors recorded zero transactions, reinforcing their passive role in the county.

A key finding in Q4 is the source of investor acquisitions. Zero percent of properties bought by landlords were purchased from other landlords. This indicates that investors are sourcing their inventory from traditional homeowners and the open market, not from a closed loop of investor-to-investor sales.

Pricing data from the quarter shows that new single-property landlords, who were involved in 3 transactions, paid an average price of $74,000. This low price point suggests new entrants are targeting lower-cost, value-add properties to begin their portfolios.

Landlords in the 6-10 property tier were the most active, with 5 transactions, while new landlords and two-property owners each had 3 transactions. This distribution shows activity across the spectrum of small-scale investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Cash-rich mom-and-pop investors control 87.7% of Bartholomew County's rental market as institutions retreat as net sellers.
Holdings
In Bartholomew County, landlords own 2,956 single-family rental properties, which constitutes 12.0% of the total market. Individual investors hold a commanding 75.3% of this portfolio (2,227 properties), with companies owning the remaining 24.7%.
Pricing
Landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power in Q4 2025, paying an average of 25.4% less than traditional homeowners. This amounted to an average price of $74,000 for investors versus $99,255 for homeowners, a discount of $25,255 per property.
Activity
Investors purchased 22.0% of all homes sold in Q4 2025 (9 properties), with all acquisitions made by mom-and-pop landlords. The market saw 3 new single-property investors enter, signaling continued grassroots growth.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) dominate the market, controlling 87.7% of all investor-owned housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own just 1.9%, highlighting a market driven by local players.
Ownership Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly own smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 11-20 properties. This indicates a shift to corporate structures as landlords scale their operations beyond 10 homes.
Transactions
The overall landlord market remains in a strong accumulation phase, acting as net buyers with 48 purchases versus 23 sales in 2025. Conversely, institutional investors are net sellers, having sold more properties than they acquired in 2024.
Market Narrative

In Bartholomew County, the single-family rental market is fundamentally shaped by local, independent investors, not large corporations. Landlords own 2,956 properties, making up 12.0% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This landscape is dominated by 'mom-and-pop' investors (1-10 properties), who control a commanding 87.7% of the rental portfolio. Individual investors own over three-quarters (75.3%) of these homes, while institutional investors have a minimal footprint at just 1.9%, challenging any notion of a corporate takeover.

Investor behavior in Bartholomew County is characterized by strategic, cash-heavy acquisitions and steady growth. A remarkable 100% of the investor portfolio is owned outright with cash, providing significant market stability. In Q4 2025, investors purchased 22.0% of homes for sale and secured them at a 25.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners. While the overall market is in an accumulation phase, with landlords acting as consistent net buyers, institutional players are divesting, operating as net sellers. This divergence underscores a healthy, ground-up market expansion led by small investors.

The key takeaway for the Bartholomew County housing market is its resilience and decentralized nature. The dominance of cash-rich, small-scale landlords creates a fragmented and competitive rental environment, insulating it from the volatility of large, leveraged institutional strategies. The primary driver of the rental market is a large base of local individuals and small companies focused on long-term, buy-and-hold strategies, a trend that is likely to ensure a stable supply of rental housing for the foreseeable future.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 08:35 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBartholomew (IN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions