Massac (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Massac (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Massac (IL)
4,738
Total Investors in Massac (IL)
1,721
Investor Owned SFR in Massac (IL)
1,281(27.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,676
SFR Owned
1,234
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
45
SFR Owned
55
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,281 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Massac County, Buying 66% of Homes in Q4 2025
Investors own 27.0% of Single-Family Residences in Massac County, IL, with individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling 98.0% of that portfolio. In Q4, landlords were hyperactive, purchasing 65.9% of all homes sold while securing a significant 31.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners. The market is defined by small, individual investors who are aggressively accumulating properties.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,281 SFRs in Massac County, with individuals holding 96.3% of them.
Three-quarters of investor-owned properties (969 of 1,281) are held in cash, without financing. The portfolio is highly focused on rentals, with 1,260 of the 1,281 properties classified as rented. Individual landlords (1,676) vastly outnumber company landlords (45).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 31.8% less than homeowners in Q4, a $40,963 average discount per property.
This Q4 discount marks a sharp reversal from the previous three quarters, where landlords paid premiums of 19.6% (Q1), 3.8% (Q2), and 31.3% (Q3). This volatility suggests a significant shift in market dynamics at the end of the year. The average landlord purchase price in Q4 was $87,704, compared to $128,667 for homeowners.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, purchasing 27 of 41 homes sold for a 65.9% market share.
Small 'mom-and-pop' investors (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 100% of these landlord purchases. The market saw an influx of 25 new, single-property landlords, who alone acquired 17 properties (60.7% of the landlord total). No institutional investors (Tier 09) made any purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 98.0% of all investor-owned SFRs in Massac County.
Single-property landlords alone account for 84.9% of the investor-owned housing stock, with 1,115 properties. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just 2 properties, or 0.2% of the total.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate all small tiers; companies only become the majority in the 101-1000 property tier.
In the foundational single-property tier, individuals own 97.5% of the properties (1,094 homes). The crossover point where companies take majority control (83.3%) does not occur until the 'Large' 101-1000 property tier, demonstrating a market overwhelmingly controlled by private individuals.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Massac County is highly concentrated, with zip code 62960 holding 956 properties.
While 62960 has the highest volume, zip code 62953 has the highest investor penetration rate at 48.6%. This is followed by 62910, where investors own 32.4% of the housing stock. The data shows distinct pockets of high investor concentration within the county.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Massac County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 36 properties and selling only 2 in Q4.
This accumulation trend is consistent throughout the year, with landlords purchasing 166 properties while selling only 23 in 2025. This results in a powerful buy-to-sell ratio of 7.2 to 1 for the year. No institutional transactions were recorded, meaning all activity came from smaller investors.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 60.0% of all Q4 property transactions in Massac County.
Mom-and-pop investors drove 100% of this activity. First-time landlords (Tier 01) paid the highest average price at $97,674, while small landlords (Tier 03) paid the least at $20,000. Only 8.0% of properties purchased by new landlords came from other investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,281 SFRs in Massac County, with individuals holding 96.3% of them.
Detailed Findings

In Massac County, IL, investors own a substantial 27.0% of the single-family residential market, totaling 1,281 properties.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who control 1,234 properties, representing 96.3% of the investor-owned market. In contrast, company-owned properties number just 55, or 4.3% of the total.

A significant majority of investor properties, 75.6% (969 properties), are owned outright with cash, compared to just 24.4% (312 properties) that are financed. This indicates a market with high equity and low leverage among landlords.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rental purposes, with 1,260 of the 1,281 properties being rented, demonstrating a clear focus on generating rental income.

The landlord landscape itself reflects this individual dominance, with 1,676 individual landlords compared to only 45 company entities, a ratio of more than 37 to 1.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 31.8% less than homeowners in Q4, a $40,963 average discount per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, investors in Massac County achieved a remarkable pricing advantage, purchasing properties for an average of $87,704, which is 31.8% less than the $128,667 paid by traditional homeowners. This translates to a cash discount of $40,963 per property.

This significant discount represents a dramatic market reversal. In the three preceding quarters of 2025, landlords consistently paid a premium over homeowners: 19.6% in Q1, 3.8% in Q2, and a substantial 31.3% in Q3.

The shift from paying a $25,590 premium in Q3 to securing a $40,963 discount in Q4 indicates a major change in negotiating power or acquisition strategy for investors toward the end of the year.

Despite the Q4 price drop, the average acquisition price for landlords throughout 2025 ($99,330) was significantly higher than prices seen during the 2020-2023 period ($68,733), reflecting long-term market appreciation.

The data does not show any acquisition activity in Massac County for 2024 or 2025 to date, making the sudden shift in Q4 2025 pricing even more pronounced.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, purchasing 27 of 41 homes sold for a 65.9% market share.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 27 of the 41 total SFRs sold in Massac County, capturing a commanding 65.9% of all market purchases.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by 'mom-and-pop' landlords owning between 1 and 10 properties, who collectively bought all 28 properties attributed to tiered investors.

New entrants were a primary driver of Q4 activity. The single-property tier saw 25 new entities enter the market, acquiring 17 properties and accounting for 60.7% of all landlord purchases.

Mid-size and institutional investors were completely absent from the purchasing landscape this quarter, with 0 properties acquired by landlords in Tiers 05 through 09.

The two-property tier also showed notable activity, with 5 entities purchasing 8 properties, representing 28.6% of investor acquisitions for the quarter.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 98.0% of all investor-owned SFRs in Massac County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Massac County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who collectively own 98.0% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, holding 1,115 properties, which constitutes 84.9% of the entire investor portfolio. This highlights the highly fragmented and individualized nature of rental ownership in the county.

The scale of ownership drops off sharply, with two-property landlords holding 5.8% of the portfolio, and the 3-5 property tier holding 5.6%.

Mid-size investors (11-1000 properties) have a very limited footprint, collectively owning just 24 properties, or 1.9% of the investor-owned market.

Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have a near-zero presence, controlling only 2 properties, which represents just 0.2% of the investor total. This counters any narrative of large corporate dominance in the local market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate all small tiers; companies only become the majority in the 101-1000 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the backbone of the rental market across nearly all portfolio sizes in Massac County. They own 97.5% of single-property holdings and 100% of properties in the 6-10 unit tier.

The transition to corporate ownership occurs only at a significant scale. Companies do not achieve a majority stake until the 'Large' landlord tier (101-1000 properties), where they control 5 of the 6 properties (83.3%).

Even in mid-size tiers, individual ownership remains strong. For example, in the 51-100 property tier, individuals still own a majority with 57.1% of the properties.

Company ownership is most visible in the smallest and largest tiers. While they only own 2.5% of single-property holdings, this represents their largest portfolio by property count at 28 properties.

The data clearly illustrates a market where individuals build small-to-medium portfolios, while corporate ownership is concentrated at the highest, albeit very small, end of the market.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Massac County is highly concentrated, with zip code 62960 holding 956 properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis within Massac County reveals significant concentration of investor-owned properties in specific zip codes. The 62960 zip code is the epicenter of investor ownership by volume, containing 956 investor-held SFRs.

However, the highest rate of investor penetration is found in the 62953 zip code, where landlords own 48.6% of the SFR properties, indicating a market where nearly half the homes are investor-owned.

The 62910 zip code also shows a strong investor presence, with 243 properties owned by landlords, translating to a 32.4% ownership rate.

In contrast, the 62956 zip code has a much lower concentration, with only 11 investor properties and a 15.9% ownership rate, highlighting the variability of investor focus across the county.

The zip code 62938 shows no available data for investor ownership, indicating it may be an area with very low transaction volume or a statistical anomaly.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Massac County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 36 properties and selling only 2 in Q4.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Massac County demonstrated a strong pattern of portfolio growth throughout 2025, consistently acting as net buyers. In Q4, they purchased 36 SFRs while only selling 2, a buy-to-sell ratio of 18 to 1.

This aggressive acquisition behavior was sustained across all quarters of 2025. In Q3, investors bought 43 and sold 4, and in Q2 they bought 51 and sold 10.

Cumulatively for the year 2025, landlords acquired 166 properties and divested only 23, resulting in a net gain of 143 properties and a robust 7.2-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio.

The acquisition trend in 2025 mirrors that of 2024, when investors purchased 169 properties and sold only 19, indicating a multi-year period of sustained portfolio expansion.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) were entirely inactive, with zero buy or sell transactions recorded, underscoring that the market's accumulation is driven exclusively by smaller landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 60.0% of all Q4 property transactions in Massac County.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a dominant force in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 36 of the 60 total SFR transactions, a share of 60.0%.

All 36 of these investor transactions were conducted by 'mom-and-pop' landlords in Tiers 01-04, with zero activity from mid-size or institutional investors.

A clear pricing disparity exists between tiers. New single-property investors paid the highest average price at $97,674 for 25 properties. In contrast, landlords in the 3-5 property tier acquired 3 properties at a significantly lower average price of just $20,000.

The data suggests that new investors are primarily buying from homeowners, not other landlords. Of the 25 transactions by single-property landlords, only 2 (8.0%) were purchased from another investor.

Investors in the two-property and small landlord (3-5) tiers recorded zero purchases from other landlords, indicating they sourced all of their acquisitions from the traditional homeowner market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Fuel Massac County Market, Buying 66% of Homes and Holding 98% of Rentals
Holdings
Investors own 1,281 single-family homes in Massac County, IL, representing 27.0% of the market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individuals, who own 1,234 properties (96.3%), while companies own just 55 (4.3%).
Pricing
In a sharp market reversal, landlords secured a 31.8% discount compared to homeowners in Q4 2025, paying an average of $87,704 versus the homeowner price of $128,667.
Activity
Landlords dominated Q4 sales, purchasing 27 properties for a 65.9% market share. This activity was driven by new entrants, with 25 new single-property landlords joining the market.
Market Share
The market is the domain of small investors, as 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control 98.0% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors own a negligible 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors control portfolios at nearly every scale, with companies only achieving majority ownership (83.3%) in the sparsely populated 'Large' landlord tier of 101-1000 properties.
Transactions
Investors are aggressive net buyers in Massac County, purchasing 36 properties while selling only 2 in Q4 2025. Institutional investors recorded zero transactions, showing no activity in the market.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Massac County, IL is fundamentally shaped and controlled by small, individual investors. Landlords own a significant 27.0% of all SFR properties, a total of 1,281 homes. This ownership is not concentrated in corporate hands; instead, individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) command an overwhelming 98.0% of the investor-owned housing stock. In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios exceeding 1,000 properties have a nearly invisible footprint, owning just 0.2% of the total.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was characterized by aggressive acquisition. Landlords purchased 65.9% of all homes sold in the county, a charge led by 25 new single-property investors entering the market. This activity was paired with a sharp pricing advantage; after paying premiums for three consecutive quarters, landlords secured a 31.8% discount relative to traditional homeowners in Q4. This buying spree confirms a broader trend of accumulation, as landlords across the county acted as strong net buyers, purchasing 18 homes for every one they sold during the quarter.

The key takeaway for the Massac County housing market is that it is driven by a highly active and fragmented base of local, individual investors, not large corporations. This dynamic creates a competitive environment for traditional homebuyers, who must contend with landlords that command a majority of transactions and demonstrate an ability to secure properties at a significant discount. The sustained net buying from these small investors signals continued upward pressure on rental supply and potentially on home prices in the region.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 02:44 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyMassac (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell