Kendall (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Kendall (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Kendall (IL)
41,305
Total Investors in Kendall (IL)
9,497
Investor Owned SFR in Kendall (IL)
6,651(16.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
8,913
SFR Owned
5,854
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
584
SFR Owned
930
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 6,651 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Kendall County with 94.5% Ownership Share While Institutions Retreat
Investors own 16.1% of SFRs in Kendall County, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 94.5% of that portfolio versus just 3.5% for institutions. In Q4, landlords purchased 68.7% of all homes sold, acquiring them at a 2.0% discount to homeowners. While the market sees a massive influx of new small investors, institutional players are net sellers, signaling a major divergence in strategy.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 6,651 SFRs (16.1% of market), with individuals holding a dominant 88.0%.
The majority of investor properties, 69.6% (4,627), are financed, while 30.4% (2,024) are owned outright in cash. A massive 98.7% of the portfolio consists of rented, non-owner-occupied properties, underscoring the strong rental focus.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4, landlords secured a 2.0% discount, paying $8,000 less than homeowners on average.
The pricing advantage fluctuates quarterly; landlords paid a premium in Q1 (5.7%) and Q3 (7.1%) but secured discounts in Q2 (2.4%) and Q4 (2.0%). Data for individual versus company price comparison is not available in the provided data.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, acquiring 224 properties, a massive 68.7% of all market purchases.
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) were the driving force, responsible for 98.7% of all landlord purchases. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+) acquired just a single property.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 94.5% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 84.5% (5,741 properties) of the entire investor portfolio. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+) hold a minor 3.5% share (235 properties), challenging the narrative of corporate dominance.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies assume majority control starting at the 21-50 property tier.
The crossover from individual to company majority ownership occurs in the 21-50 property tier, where companies own 85.7% of properties. Individual investors still represent over 63% of ownership even in the 11-20 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 60560, with 1,763 properties owned by investors.
The highest investor penetration is in zip code 60536, where investors own 60.7% of SFRs. The top three zip codes by count (60560, 60543, 60538) collectively hold 4,330 investor-owned properties, 65.1% of the county's total.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 9.6x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025, while institutions are net sellers.
In a stark reversal of the overall trend, institutional investors (1000+) were net sellers in 2025, selling five properties while acquiring only one. Transaction volume has remained high, with 1,854 purchases in 2025 compared to 2,186 in 2024.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove the Q4 market, accounting for 360 transactions, or 68.2% of all activity.
Institutional buyers paid 9.7% less than single-property landlords in Q4 ($355,000 vs $393,260). Smaller landlords were more likely to buy from other investors, with 15.4% of purchases in the 3-5 property tier sourced from fellow landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 6,651 SFRs (16.1% of market), with individuals holding a dominant 88.0%.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a significant footprint in Kendall County, owning 6,651 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 16.1% of the total market of 41,305 SFRs.

The ownership landscape is overwhelmingly composed of individual investors, who hold 5,854 properties (88.0%), dwarfing the 930 properties (14.0%) held by companies and challenging the narrative of corporate dominance.

This pattern extends to the number of investor entities, where 8,913 individual landlords make up 93.8% of the total 9,497 investors, compared to just 584 company entities.

The portfolio is heavily focused on generating rental income, with 6,564 properties (98.7%) classified as rented and non-owner-occupied, indicating a clear business purpose rather than speculative holding.

A majority of the investor-owned portfolio is leveraged, as evidenced by 4,627 properties (69.6%) being financed, while 2,024 properties (30.4%) are owned free-and-clear with cash.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4, landlords secured a 2.0% discount, paying $8,000 less than homeowners on average.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $393,629, which is 2.0% ($8,000) less than the $401,629 paid by traditional homeowners.

This landlord discount is highly volatile and not consistent throughout the year. While investors secured discounts in Q4 and Q2 (2.4%), they paid significant premiums in other quarters, including a 7.1% premium ($28,582) in Q3 and a 5.7% premium ($20,536) in Q1.

Overall acquisition prices have remained relatively stable year-over-year, with the 2025 average price of $407,135 being just slightly higher than the 2024 average of $403,418.

However, current prices reflect substantial market appreciation since the 2020-2023 period, when the average acquisition price was $352,397. The 2025 average represents a 15.5% increase from that timeframe.

It is important to note that while price points are provided, the corresponding property counts in the acquisition data are zero, suggesting these averages are based on a specific sample not reflected in the aggregate counts.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, acquiring 224 properties, a massive 68.7% of all market purchases.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were the primary buyers in Kendall County during Q4 2025, purchasing 224 of the 326 total SFRs sold and capturing a commanding 68.7% market share of all transactions.

This buying surge was almost entirely driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) acquired 221 properties, which accounts for 98.7% of all landlord purchases during the quarter.

The market witnessed a significant influx of new entrants, with 331 new single-property landlord entities making purchases. These new investors alone acquired 202 properties, representing 89.4% of all landlord buying activity.

Institutional investors with portfolios over 1,000 properties had a negligible impact on the Q4 market, purchasing only a single property. This underscores a market heavily skewed towards smaller, local investors.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) also played a very limited role, collectively acquiring only 4 properties, further cementing the overwhelming dominance of the smallest investor tiers in driving market activity.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 94.5% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Kendall County is overwhelmingly controlled by small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a massive 94.5% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The single-property landlord is the true backbone of the rental market, with this tier alone accounting for 5,741 properties. This represents 84.5% of the entire investor-held housing stock in the county.

In stark contrast to common narratives, institutional investors (Tier 09) have a very small footprint. Their holdings of 235 properties amount to just 3.5% of the investor-owned market.

Mid-size investors (owning 11-1,000 properties) collectively own only 2.1% of the market's investor-held properties, highlighting a significant gap between the vast number of small landlords and the few large-scale players.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented and decentralized ownership structure, indicating the local rental market is primarily supplied by individuals rather than large corporations.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies assume majority control starting at the 21-50 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of the Kendall County market, overwhelmingly dominating smaller portfolios. They own 93.1% of all single-property holdings and maintain a majority share of over 63% in portfolios as large as 20 properties.

A distinct strategic shift occurs in the 21-50 property tier, where companies become the majority owner type for the first time. In this segment, companies own 85.7% of the properties, signaling a transition to more formalized business structures is necessary for scaling.

While individuals are more numerous, companies steadily increase their presence as portfolio size grows. They own 28.0% of properties in the 3-5 tier and 33.7% in the 6-10 tier, indicating a deliberate strategy of incorporation for growth.

The data reveals that many sizable portfolios continue to be managed without a corporate structure. Individuals still own 66.3% of properties in the 6-10 property tier, showcasing the viability of personal ownership at a meaningful scale.

This pattern suggests different operational strategies: individuals focus on acquiring a few properties, while investors aiming to scale beyond 20 units are more likely to adopt a corporate structure.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 60560, with 1,763 properties owned by investors.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is highly concentrated by volume, with the top two zip codes, 60560 (1,763 properties) and 60543 (1,703 properties), together accounting for 52.1% of all investor-owned SFRs in Kendall County.

While some areas have high counts, others show extreme market penetration. Zip code 60536 leads with a 60.7% investor ownership rate, followed by 60511 (50.0%), indicating neighborhoods where investors are the majority or near-majority homeowners.

A key finding is the distinction between areas with high volume versus high penetration rates. For example, 60560 leads the county by count but has a modest 18.7% ownership rate, far lower than the 60.7% in 60536, revealing different investor strategies.

The dominance of a few key areas is clear, as the top five zip codes by property count contain 5,541 properties, representing 83.3% of the total investor portfolio in the county.

This geographic distribution reveals clear investment theses, with some investors targeting larger, more liquid markets for volume while others focus on smaller markets to achieve high density and market control.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 9.6x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025, while institutions are net sellers.
Detailed Findings

The investor community in Kendall County is in a strong accumulation phase. In 2025, landlords purchased 1,854 SFRs while selling only 193, resulting in a net gain of 1,661 properties and a powerful 9.6-to-1 buy/sell ratio.

In a sharp and telling contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) are actively divesting from the market. During 2025, this tier was a net seller, acquiring only one property while offloading five, indicating a strategic retreat.

This strong net-buyer trend among the broader investor base is consistent across recent quarters. In Q4 2025, landlords maintained an 8.8-to-1 buy/sell ratio (360 buys vs. 41 sells), demonstrating sustained demand for acquisitions.

Transaction velocity remains high. While slightly down from the 2,186 purchases in 2024, the 1,854 acquisitions in 2025 signal continued confidence and capital deployment into the Kendall County market by smaller investors.

The divergence between smaller investors accumulating and large institutions selling suggests a market shift. Mom-and-pop landlords are absorbing inventory, including properties offloaded by larger players, and are now the primary drivers of market growth.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove the Q4 market, accounting for 360 transactions, or 68.2% of all activity.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity defined the market in Q4 2025, with landlords participating in 360 of the 528 total transactions. This 68.2% share establishes them as the primary movers of housing inventory in Kendall County.

A clear pricing advantage emerges with scale. The institutional investor in the 1000+ tier paid an average of $355,000, securing a 9.7% discount compared to the $393,260 average price paid by new single-property landlords.

Transaction volume was overwhelmingly concentrated among the smallest investors. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were responsible for 331 transactions, representing 91.9% of all landlord activity for the quarter.

While most purchases come from the open market, some inter-landlord trading occurs, especially among established small investors. Landlords in the 3-5 property tier sourced 15.4% of their acquisitions from other investors, a higher rate than the 11.8% for new buyers.

Purchase prices varied significantly across tiers, suggesting different asset strategies. Small landlords in the 3-5 property tier paid the highest average price at $475,667, while some mid-size tiers focused on lower-priced assets, paying as little as $203,500.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors dominate Kendall County's market with 94.5% ownership, as institutional players retreat as net sellers.
Holdings
Investors own 6,651 SFR properties in Kendall County, representing 16.1% of the market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 5,854 properties (88.0%) compared to 930 (14.0%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated a pricing advantage, paying an average of $393,629, a 2.0% discount ($8,000) compared to the $401,629 paid by traditional homeowners.
Activity
Landlords dominated Q4 sales, purchasing 224 properties for a 68.7% market share. Activity was fueled by an influx of 331 new single-property landlord entities entering the market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control the vast majority of investor housing at 94.5%. In stark contrast, large institutional investors (1000+ properties) own just 3.5%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but a clear shift occurs at the 21-50 property tier, where companies become the majority owners with an 85.7% share.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 9.6 properties for every one sold in 2025. Conversely, institutional investors were net sellers, divesting five properties while acquiring only one.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Kendall County, Illinois, is defined by the dominance of small, individual landlords. Investors control a significant 16.1% of the single-family housing stock, owning 6,651 properties. This ownership is highly decentralized, with individual investors holding 88.0% of the portfolio. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) command an overwhelming 94.5% share, while large-scale institutional investors hold a minimal 3.5%, challenging the narrative of a corporate takeover of suburban housing.

Investor activity is in a phase of aggressive accumulation. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired a commanding 68.7% of all homes sold, driven by 331 new single-property investors entering the market. While their pricing advantage fluctuates, they secured a 2.0% discount compared to homeowners in Q4. Overall, landlords are strong net buyers with a 9.6-to-1 buy/sell ratio in 2025, but this trend is inverted at the institutional level, where large investors are net sellers, signaling a strategic retreat.

The key takeaway for Kendall County is a resilient and growing rental market fueled by an expanding base of local, mom-and-pop investors who are actively acquiring properties, even as the largest institutional players pull back. This dynamic suggests that market opportunities and housing supply are being shaped by individual capital, not corporate strategy. The high concentration of investor ownership in specific zip codes, such as 60.7% in 60536, indicates that certain neighborhoods are transitioning into investor-majority areas, which will have long-term implications for the local housing ecosystem.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 02:34 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyKendall (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth