Jo Daviess (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Jo Daviess (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Jo Daviess (IL)
7,889
Total Investors in Jo Daviess (IL)
3,038
Investor Owned SFR in Jo Daviess (IL)
2,287(29.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,728
SFR Owned
2,070
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
310
SFR Owned
275
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,287 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Dominated Market Sees Investor Activity Grind to a Halt in Q4
Investors own 29.0% of SFRs in Jo Daviess County, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 99.9% of that portfolio. After a period of aggressive net buying, all investor purchasing activity ceased in Q4 2025, signaling a major market shift.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,287 SFR properties in Jo Daviess County, with individuals holding a dominant 90.5% share.
Cash purchases are prevalent, with 1,667 properties owned outright compared to 620 financed. A substantial 2,254 properties are designated as rentals, highlighting a strong investment focus.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlord pricing in Jo Daviess County shows extreme volatility, swinging from a 50.7% premium to a 15.0% discount in 2025.
The landlord price advantage is inconsistent, showing a $41,868 discount in Q3 but a staggering $94,250 premium in Q1. No landlord purchases were recorded in the most recent quarters, indicating a sharp drop in acquisition activity.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchasing activity in Jo Daviess County came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with zero properties acquired.
With zero landlord purchases, both mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely inactive in the market this quarter. All 4 SFR sales went to non-investor buyers.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors control virtually the entire market in Jo Daviess County, owning 99.9% of all investor-held SFRs.
Single-property landlords are the overwhelming majority, holding 1,980 properties (84.5% of the total). Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence in this market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate every ownership tier in Jo Daviess County, with no crossover point to company majority.
In the two-property tier, individuals own 96.7% of homes, and even in the 6-10 property tier, they hold a 96.4% share. Companies only have a notable presence (12.3%) in the single-property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership in Jo Daviess County is heavily concentrated, with the 61036 zip code alone holding 1,258 properties.
The 61036 zip code has a high investor ownership rate of 36.3%, but other areas are even more saturated. The 61074 zip code is 100.0% investor-owned, and 61059 has a 61.4% rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Jo Daviess County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 111 properties while selling only 10 in 2025.
The buy-to-sell ratio was a staggering 11.1-to-1 in 2025, and even higher at 13.1-to-1 in 2024. This demonstrates a strong and consistent strategy of portfolio expansion over the past two years.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investor transaction activity in Jo Daviess County disappeared in Q4 2025, with landlords involved in zero of the 5 market transactions.
The transaction freeze was total, with both mom-and-pop and institutional tiers recording zero activity. There was no inter-landlord trading during the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,287 SFR properties in Jo Daviess County, with individuals holding a dominant 90.5% share.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the backbone of the Jo Daviess County rental market, owning 2,070 properties, which constitutes a commanding 90.5% of the total investor portfolio. Companies, in contrast, hold a much smaller stake with 275 properties (12.0%).

Landlord-owned properties represent a significant footprint in the local housing market, accounting for 29.0% of the total 7,889 single-family residential homes.

A strong indicator of investor financial health is the preference for cash ownership. A total of 1,667 properties are owned outright, a figure nearly three times higher than the 620 properties that are financed.

The investor base is broad and fragmented, comprising 3,038 distinct entities. The vast majority are individuals (2,728) compared to just 310 company entities, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' nature of the market.

The primary focus of these holdings is clear, with 2,254 properties identified as rentals, demonstrating that the overwhelming majority of the investor portfolio is actively used for rental income.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlord pricing in Jo Daviess County shows extreme volatility, swinging from a 50.7% premium to a 15.0% discount in 2025.
Detailed Findings

The price gap between landlords and traditional homeowners in Jo Daviess County has been highly unpredictable. In Q1 2025, landlords paid a significant 50.7% premium ($280,079 vs. $185,829), but by Q3 this flipped to a 15.0% discount ($237,152 vs. $279,020).

The common assumption of a consistent landlord discount does not hold true here. In two of the three recorded quarters of 2025, landlords paid substantial premiums over homeowners, including a $67,170 premium in Q2 (27.9%).

A critical trend is the complete halt in recorded landlord purchasing activity. From Q4 2024 through the end of 2025, investors acquired zero properties, suggesting a major pullback from the market.

This recent inactivity contrasts with the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average price of $244,538, a benchmark that the volatile 2025 prices frequently surpassed before activity ceased.

The lack of any acquisitions in recent quarters signals a market where investors have fully paused, likely waiting for more favorable economic conditions or entry points.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchasing activity in Jo Daviess County came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with zero properties acquired.
Detailed Findings

In a stark reversal of previous trends, landlords made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, capturing 0% of the 4 total market sales and indicating a complete freeze in investor acquisitions.

The purchasing halt was universal across all investor sizes. Both mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) and the non-existent institutional investors recorded zero acquisitions for the quarter.

The lack of any purchases in the single-property tier signifies that no new landlords entered the Jo Daviess County market during Q4 2025, halting the flow of new small-scale investment.

With investors entirely on the sidelines, the local housing market was driven exclusively by other buyer types, presumably traditional homeowners, who accounted for 100% of Q4 purchases.

This Q4 inactivity stands in sharp contrast to the substantial existing landlord portfolio of 2,287 properties, highlighting a dramatic shift from a strategy of accumulation to a holding pattern.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors control virtually the entire market in Jo Daviess County, owning 99.9% of all investor-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Jo Daviess County is defined by small landlords, with 'mom-and-pop' investors (owning 1-10 properties) controlling a near-total 99.9% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords are the dominant force, with their 1,980 properties accounting for a massive 84.5% of the entire investor portfolio. This underscores the hyper-fragmented nature of local ownership.

Institutional capital is completely absent from this market. There is zero ownership from investors in the 1,000+ property tier, challenging any narrative of large corporations controlling local housing.

Ownership is heavily concentrated at the smallest scale. The first two tiers combined (1 and 2 properties) own 2,133 properties, representing 91.0% of all investor-held homes.

The market lacks a significant mid-size investor segment. Landlords owning 11-50 properties control a negligible 3 properties in total (0.1%), indicating a steep decline in ownership beyond the 10-property threshold.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate every ownership tier in Jo Daviess County, with no crossover point to company majority.
Detailed Findings

Unlike in larger metropolitan markets, there is no portfolio size in Jo Daviess County where companies become the majority owners. Individual investors maintain overwhelming control across every single tier.

Individual dominance persists even as portfolios grow. Individuals own 87.7% of single-property portfolios, 96.7% of two-property portfolios, and 100.0% of properties in the 11-20 tier.

Company ownership is minimal and does not scale with portfolio size. The largest corporate presence is 12.3% in the single-property tier, and this share diminishes in larger tiers, falling to just 3.6% for portfolios of 6-10 properties.

This ownership structure points to a market driven by local residents and small-scale private investment rather than professionalized, corporate real estate firms.

The data clearly shows that individuals are not just entry-level landlords; they represent the entirety of the largest investor portfolios recorded in the county.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership in Jo Daviess County is heavily concentrated, with the 61036 zip code alone holding 1,258 properties.
Detailed Findings

The 61036 zip code is the clear epicenter of investor activity in Jo Daviess County, containing 1,258 investor-owned properties. This single area represents more than half of the county's entire investor portfolio.

Several smaller zip codes show extreme levels of investor saturation. The 61074 zip code is reported as 100.0% investor-owned, while the 61059 zip code has a 61.4% rate, indicating these are essentially rental-exclusive communities.

A distinction exists between areas with the highest count versus the highest percentage of investor ownership. While 61036 leads in volume, smaller zip codes like 61074 and 61059 demonstrate a more intense market penetration.

The top five zip codes by investor count all feature high ownership rates, ranging from 13.2% in 61085 to a very high 44.1% in 61001, showing deep investor presence in key areas.

This geographic clustering suggests investors are strategically targeting specific communities, likely influenced by factors such as tourism appeal, local employment, or desirable housing stock.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Jo Daviess County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 111 properties while selling only 10 in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Historical data reveals a strong accumulation phase among landlords, who have consistently operated as aggressive net buyers. In 2025, they acquired 111 properties while selling only 10, a net gain of 101 properties.

The buy-to-sell ratio highlights this acquisitive stance, reaching 11.1x in 2025. This followed an even more aggressive year in 2024, which had a 13.1x ratio based on 131 buys versus 10 sells.

While landlords remained strong net buyers in 2025, acquisition momentum did slow slightly compared to the previous year, with 20 fewer purchases.

Selling activity has been consistently low and stable. Investors sold exactly 10 properties in both 2024 and 2025, indicating that dispositions are rare and likely represent isolated portfolio adjustments rather than a market-wide trend.

This pattern of net buying held true on a quarterly basis throughout early 2025, with Q2 showing 57 buys versus only 6 sells, before activity halted later in the year.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investor transaction activity in Jo Daviess County disappeared in Q4 2025, with landlords involved in zero of the 5 market transactions.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were completely absent from the transaction market in Q4 2025, accounting for 0% of the 5 total SFR transactions in Jo Daviess County.

The market freeze extended to inter-landlord trading, with zero properties bought from other landlords. This indicates a pause in both external acquisitions and internal portfolio reshuffling.

This halt in transaction volume was universal, impacting every investor tier from single-property landlords upwards. No segment of the investor community was active during the quarter.

The Q4 data marks a dramatic reversal from the strong net-buying activity seen in previous quarters and years, signaling a significant shift in market sentiment or conditions.

With investors on the sidelines, the 5 transactions that did occur were exclusively between non-investor parties, making Q4 a market driven entirely by traditional homeowners.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors own 99.9% of the Jo Daviess County rental market, but all investor buying activity abruptly halted in Q4.
Holdings
Investors own 2,287 single-family residential properties in Jo Daviess County, representing a significant 29.0% of the market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors (90.5%) compared to companies (12.0%).
Pricing
Landlord acquisition pricing proved highly volatile in 2025, swinging from a 50.7% premium ($94,250) over homeowners in Q1 to a 15.0% discount ($41,868) by Q3.
Activity
After consistent buying, investor activity came to a complete stop in Q4 2025, with landlords accounting for 0% of the 4 SFR purchases. No new landlords entered the market during this period.
Market Share
The local market is defined by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.9% of all investor housing. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate ownership across every portfolio size, maintaining a majority of at least 87.7% in all tiers. There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners.
Transactions
Prior to Q4, landlords were aggressive net buyers with an 11.1x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 (111 buys vs 10 sells). However, all transaction activity, including from non-existent institutional players, ceased in Q4 2025.
Market Narrative

Landlords have a substantial presence in Jo Daviess County, owning 2,287 properties which amounts to 29.0% of the total single-family residential market. This market is fundamentally driven by small, individual investors who own 90.5% of the investor-held portfolio. The ownership structure is hyper-fragmented, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 99.9% of investor homes, while institutional capital is completely absent.

Historically, these local investors have been in a strong accumulation phase, acting as aggressive net buyers with an 11.1-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in 2025. Their pricing behavior has been volatile, swinging from large premiums to discounts compared to homeowners throughout the year. However, this momentum came to an abrupt halt in Q4 2025, when landlords made zero purchases and were involved in zero transactions, completely withdrawing from the market.

The key takeaway is that the Jo Daviess County investor market is a closed ecosystem of local, small-scale landlords who have built a significant market share. The sudden freeze in all investor activity in late 2025 is the most critical finding, signaling a dramatic shift in sentiment. This suggests the market may have reached a saturation point or that local economic factors have made further investment unattractive, leaving the market entirely to traditional homebuyers for the time being.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 02:32 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyJo Daviess (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords