Jasper (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Jasper (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Jasper (IL)
2,356
Total Investors in Jasper (IL)
382
Investor Owned SFR in Jasper (IL)
339(14.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
357
SFR Owned
310
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
25
SFR Owned
35
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 339 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Hyper-Local Landlords Dominate Jasper County with 98% Share, Securing 72% Discounts
Investors own 339 SFR properties in Jasper County, IL (14.4% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 98.3% versus 0.0% for institutional investors. In Q4, landlords purchased 11.1% of all homes sold, paying an average of 72.0% less than traditional homeowners. The market is characterized by consistent net buying from local investors and a complete absence of large-scale corporate activity.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 339 SFR properties in Jasper County, with individual investors holding 91.4%.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (333) versus financed (6), a ratio of over 55 to 1. Investor properties are overwhelmingly rental-focused, with 323 of 339 properties classified as rented. Individual landlords (357) vastly outnumber company landlords (25) by more than 14 to 1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords in Q4 paid an average of $40,500, a massive 72.0% less than traditional homeowners.
This Q4 discount of $104,250 per property continues a trend of deep discounts, following an 85.3% discount in Q3 and a 59.0% discount in Q2. Landlord acquisition prices have remained relatively low, with the 2025 yearly average at $59,731. The price gap between landlords and homeowners has consistently exceeded $98,000 in each quarter of 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords accounted for 11.1% of all SFR purchases in Q4, acquiring 3 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of all investor purchases this quarter. No institutional investors (1000+ properties) made any purchases. One new single-property landlord entered the market, representing a third of new investor activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 98.3% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone make up the largest segment, owning 236 properties, which is 68.0% of the entire investor portfolio. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have absolutely no presence, holding 0.0% of the market. The portfolio concentration thins rapidly, with only two landlords owning more than 10 properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies establish majority ownership only in the 6-10 property tier, controlling 85.7% of it.
Despite this one pocket of company control, individuals overwhelmingly dominate the market, owning 91.7% of all single-property landlord portfolios (222 properties). The crossover point where companies take a majority stake occurs at the 6-10 property tier. There is no institutional company ownership in the county.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 62448, with 212 properties, while 62432 has the highest rate at 27.9%.
The highest volume of investor-owned homes is in the 62448 zip code, which has an investor ownership rate of 13.2%. However, the highest penetration is in the 62432 zip code, where investors own 27.9% of the SFR housing stock (39 properties). Several zip codes in the county show no recorded investor-owned properties.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Jasper County are strong net buyers, acquiring properties at an 8.3x ratio to sales in 2025.
This trend of accumulation was consistent throughout the year, with 25 properties bought versus only 3 sold in 2025. The net buying activity continued a pattern from 2024, when landlords bought 36 properties and sold 5. Institutional investors had no transaction activity, neither buying nor selling.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 7.3% of all Q4 property transactions, exclusively within the smallest tiers.
All 3 landlord transactions were by mom-and-pop investors, with zero activity from institutional tiers. The single-property tier investor paid $40,500 for their acquisition. Half of the purchases by two-property landlords (1 of 2 transactions) were acquired from other landlords, indicating some churn within the existing investor community.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 339 SFR properties in Jasper County, with individual investors holding 91.4%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Jasper County, IL comprises 339 single-family properties, representing 14.4% of the total 2,356 SFRs in the market.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual 'mom-and-pop' style investors, who own 310 properties (91.4%), compared to just 35 properties (10.3%) owned by companies. This signifies a highly fragmented market with minimal corporate presence.

A striking 98.2% of investor-owned properties are held in cash (333 properties), with only 6 properties being financed. This indicates that investors in this market operate with high liquidity and are not reliant on traditional financing, which may contribute to their ability to secure favorable pricing.

The investor portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals, with 323 of the 339 properties (95.3%) being rented out. This highlights a clear strategy focused on generating rental income rather than short-term speculation.

The number of individual landlord entities (357) dwarfs the number of company entities (25), reinforcing the grassroots nature of real estate investment in the county. This nearly 14-to-1 ratio of individual-to-company landlords underscores the absence of large-scale investment operations.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords in Q4 paid an average of $40,500, a massive 72.0% less than traditional homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords acquired properties at a staggering 72.0% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $40,500 while homeowners paid $144,750. This represents a cash difference of $104,250 per property, suggesting investors are targeting distressed assets or non-market transactions.

This significant pricing advantage is not a one-time event but a consistent market pattern. In Q3 2025, the discount was even more pronounced at 85.3% ($26,000 vs. $176,988), and in Q2 it was 59.0% ($68,667 vs. $167,522), indicating a sustained ability for investors to purchase well below the typical market rate.

The average acquisition price for landlords has fluctuated but remained low throughout 2025, with a yearly average of $59,731. This is notably lower than the average price during the 2020-2023 period ($64,111), bucking broader market appreciation trends seen elsewhere.

The persistence of a six-figure price gap between landlords and homeowners ($104,250 in Q4, $150,988 in Q3) points to two distinct markets operating in parallel: a retail market for traditional homeowners and a deeply discounted wholesale or distressed market for investors.

Despite the attractive pricing, landlord purchase volume has been sporadic, with zero properties acquired in many recent quarters according to the available data, indicating that these deeply discounted opportunities may be infrequent.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 11.1% of all SFR purchases in Q4, acquiring 3 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Q4 2025 was modest, with landlords purchasing 3 of the 27 total SFR properties sold in Jasper County, capturing an 11.1% market share of acquisitions.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from the smallest investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) made 100% of the quarter's investor acquisitions, highlighting the complete dominance of local, small-scale players.

Demonstrating the grassroots nature of the market, one new landlord entered the scene by purchasing their first investment property. The remaining activity came from an existing landlord who added two properties to their portfolio.

In stark contrast to national trends, there was zero purchasing activity from institutional investors (Tier 09). This absence underscores that Jasper County's investment landscape is driven exclusively by small, local capital.

The low volume of just 3 properties purchased by investors, split between only two entities, signals a market with limited but consistent opportunities for small-scale landlords rather than a target for high-volume acquisition strategies.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 98.3% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Jasper County is the epitome of a 'mom-and-pop' market, with investors holding 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) controlling a near-total 98.3% of all landlord-owned SFRs.

First-time or single-holding investors are the bedrock of the market. The 'Single-property' tier alone accounts for 236 properties, representing 68.0% of the entire investor-owned housing stock.

The narrative of large-scale investors is non-existent here, as institutional landlords (Tier 09) own zero properties. This 0.0% share starkly contrasts with diversified national markets and highlights a complete lack of corporate consolidation.

Ownership is highly concentrated at the smallest scale. After single-property landlords, the next largest group is the '3-5 properties' tier, holding 65 properties (18.7%). Portfolios larger than 10 properties are exceptionally rare.

The data reveals a market comprised of a large base of small landlords rather than a few dominant players. This fragmented structure suggests a high degree of local ownership and management, shaping the local rental landscape.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies establish majority ownership only in the 6-10 property tier, controlling 85.7% of it.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of nearly every portfolio tier in Jasper County. They own 91.7% of single-property portfolios and 93.9% of two-property portfolios, underscoring their dominance at the entry level of the market.

A clear crossover point emerges in the '6-10 properties' tier, where companies become the majority owners for the first and only time. In this small segment, companies own 6 of the 7 properties, an 85.7% share, suggesting that landlords who professionalize and grow to this size are more likely to incorporate.

Even with growth, individual ownership remains resilient. In the '3-5 properties' tier, individuals still own 95.4% of the properties, indicating that incorporation is not the default path for most small-to-midsize landlords in this area.

The data shows a clear divide in strategy: the vast majority of landlords operate as individuals, while a very small number of slightly larger, yet still local, operators choose a corporate structure. There is no evidence of large corporate ownership at any tier.

In the smallest mid-size tier ('11-20 properties'), ownership reverts entirely back to individuals (100.0%), reinforcing that the company dominance in the 6-10 tier is a specific anomaly rather than a continuing trend as portfolios grow.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 62448, with 212 properties, while 62432 has the highest rate at 27.9%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Jasper County is not evenly distributed, showing significant concentration in specific zip codes. The 62448 zip code is the hub of investor activity by volume, containing 212 of the 339 investor-owned properties in the county.

While 62448 leads in raw numbers, the 62432 zip code has the highest market penetration rate. In this area, landlords own 27.9% of all single-family residential properties, a rate more than double that of 62448 (13.2%).

This divergence between volume and rate highlights two different market dynamics. The 62448 area represents the largest pool of rental properties, while 62432 indicates a smaller market where investors have a much more significant ownership footprint relative to the total housing stock.

The geographic data reveals hyper-local investment strategies, with landlords focusing their capital within very specific community boundaries rather than spreading it across the county.

Several zip codes, including 62424, 62425, and 62428, have no discernible investor ownership based on the available data, indicating these areas are almost exclusively composed of owner-occupied housing or have yet to attract rental investment.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Jasper County are strong net buyers, acquiring properties at an 8.3x ratio to sales in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Jasper County are consistently expanding their portfolios, acting as strong net buyers. In 2025, they purchased 25 SFR properties while only selling 3, a buy-to-sell ratio of 8.33 to 1, signaling a clear strategy of accumulation.

This aggressive buying posture is a multi-year trend. In 2024, landlords demonstrated similar behavior, acquiring 36 properties and selling only 5, for a net gain of 31 properties and a ratio of 7.2 to 1.

Quarterly data reinforces this pattern, with Q4 2025 showing 3 buys and 1 sell, and Q3 2025 showing 7 buys and 1 sell. This steady, quarter-over-quarter net positive acquisition demonstrates sustained confidence in the local rental market.

The institutional investor tier (1000+ properties) is entirely absent from the transaction logs. Their lack of buying or selling activity confirms that the market's transactional dynamics are driven solely by smaller, local landlords.

The consistent net buying behavior from mom-and-pop investors is steadily increasing the concentration of rental properties in the county, directly shaping the availability and nature of housing for renters.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 7.3% of all Q4 property transactions, exclusively within the smallest tiers.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were involved in 7.3% of the 41 total SFR transactions in Jasper County, with all 3 of their acquisitions made by mom-and-pop investors.

The transaction activity was confined to the smallest investor tiers. A new landlord purchased their first property for $40,500, a price point suggesting an entry-level or distressed asset acquisition. An existing two-property landlord acquired two additional homes.

Evidence of inter-landlord trading emerged, with 50.0% of the transactions in the 'Two-property' tier (1 of 2 properties) being purchased from another landlord. This suggests that some portfolio adjustment is happening between existing local investors.

There were no transactions whatsoever from institutional investors, reaffirming their 0.0% market share in both ownership and activity. The transactional market is entirely a mom-and-pop affair.

The price paid by the new Tier 01 investor ($40,500) aligns with the deep discounts observed across the market, showcasing how new entrants can access properties at significantly lower costs than typical homebuyers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop investors define Jasper County's market, owning 98.3% of rentals and buying at 72% discounts.
Holdings
Landlords own 339 SFR properties, representing 14.4% of Jasper County's market, with individual investors overwhelmingly holding 310 of those properties (91.4%) compared to just 35 (10.3%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 72.0% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average property for $40,500 compared to the homeowner price of $144,750—a remarkable discount of $104,250.
Activity
Investor purchasing was limited in Q4, with landlords acquiring 3 properties for an 11.1% share of all sales, and all activity driven by mom-and-pop investors, including one new single-property landlord.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the investment market with a 98.3% ownership share, while institutional investors (1000+) have zero presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies surprisingly take majority control (85.7%) in the small '6-10 properties' tier, which serves as the market's only corporate crossover point.
Transactions
Landlords are decisive net buyers, with 3 buys versus 1 sell in Q4 2025, continuing a strong accumulation trend, while institutional investors remain completely inactive on both sides of the ledger.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Jasper County, IL is definitively shaped by small, local operators. Investors own 339 single-family properties, making up 14.4% of the county's total SFR market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals, who own 91.4% of these homes, dwarfing the 10.3% held by companies. The market structure is highly fragmented, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 98.3% of all investor-owned housing, while large-scale institutional investors have absolutely no footprint.

Investor behavior is characterized by strategic, low-volume acquisitions at exceptionally deep discounts. In Q4 2025, landlords captured an 11.1% share of all purchases, paying an average of just $40,500—a 72.0% discount compared to the $144,750 paid by traditional homeowners. This pattern of securing properties far below market rate is consistent. Furthermore, landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring properties at a much higher rate than they sell, signaling long-term confidence and a clear strategy of portfolio growth and rental income generation.

The key takeaway for Jasper County is that its housing market operates largely insulated from the national narrative of corporate landlord expansion. It is a quintessential mom-and-pop market where investment activity is driven by local individuals with high liquidity, who leverage their market knowledge to acquire properties at significant discounts. The lack of institutional presence and the dominance of cash purchases suggest a stable, albeit small-scale, rental market governed by grassroots economics rather than large-scale financial trends.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 02:32 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyJasper (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords