Edwards (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Edwards (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Edwards (IL)
2,134
Total Investors in Edwards (IL)
157
Investor Owned SFR in Edwards (IL)
121(5.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
145
SFR Owned
112
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
12
SFR Owned
14
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 121 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Edwards County, Acquiring Properties at a 45.5% Discount
Investors own 121 SFR properties in Edwards County, representing 5.7% of the market. This landscape is controlled by individuals (92.6% of holdings), with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) comprising 98.4% of all investor-owned homes. In Q4 2025, these investors were net buyers, acquiring 28.0% of all properties sold at a staggering 45.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individuals own 92.6% of the 121 investor-held SFRs in Edwards County.
Of these holdings, 95 properties (78.5%) are owned outright with cash, compared to just 26 that are financed. The portfolio is highly focused on rentals, with 115 of 121 properties (95.0%) being non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords in Edwards County paid 45.5% less than homeowners in Q4 2025.
This substantial discount is a consistent trend, with investors paying 58.0% less in Q3 and 56.2% less in Q2. Landlord acquisition prices have trended downward from an average of $72,095 in 2020-2023 to $54,000 in 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 28.0% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for 100.0% of these acquisitions, with zero activity from institutional buyers. All 7 properties purchased by investors were acquired by 9 new, single-property landlords entering the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 98.4% of investor properties in Edwards County.
Single-property landlords alone account for 89.3% of all investor-owned SFRs. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence, holding 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals own property in every active investor tier in Edwards County.
Companies own a minority share in just two tiers, holding 7.3% of single-property portfolios and 33.3% of small (3-5 property) portfolios. At no point do companies become the majority owners.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip codes 62806, 62476, and 62815.
While zip code 62806 has the highest volume with 43 investor-owned properties, zip code 62815 exhibits the highest market penetration, with an investor ownership rate of 10.8%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Edwards County are strong net buyers, acquiring properties at a 6.75-to-1 ratio in 2025.
This accumulation trend is consistent, following a 7.5-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in 2024 (15 buys vs. 2 sells). Institutional investors recorded zero transactions, showing no activity in the market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord activity represented 21.4% of all SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
All 9 of these landlord transactions were purchases made by new, single-property investors. These new entrants paid an average price of $71,300, and 0.0% of their purchases were from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individuals own 92.6% of the 121 investor-held SFRs in Edwards County.
Detailed Findings

In Edwards County, investors own 121 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, making up 5.7% of the total 2,134 SFRs in the market.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by 145 individual landlords, who control 112 properties (92.6% of the investor portfolio). In contrast, 12 company entities own the remaining 14 properties (11.6%).

A significant majority of investor-owned properties are held free and clear, with 95 homes (78.5%) being cash-owned, while only 26 (21.5%) are financed. This indicates a low reliance on leverage among local investors.

The portfolio is almost exclusively dedicated to generating rental income, as 115 of the 121 properties (95.0%) are classified as rented or non-owner-occupied.

The ratio of individual landlords to companies (145 to 12) is far greater than the property ratio (112 to 14), signaling that the market is characterized by many small-scale individual investors rather than a few large corporate owners.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords in Edwards County paid 45.5% less than homeowners in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Edwards County secured properties at a massive discount in Q4 2025, paying an average of $71,300 while traditional homeowners paid $130,909. This represents a 45.5% price advantage, or a $59,609 savings per property.

This significant price gap is not an anomaly but a persistent market feature throughout the year. In Q3 2025, the investor discount was 58.0% ($65,754), and in Q2 it was 56.2% ($80,850), indicating a consistent ability for investors to acquire properties far below typical market rates.

Overall acquisition prices for landlords have been declining. The average price in 2025 ($54,000) is lower than in 2024 ($62,287) and significantly below the pandemic-era average from 2020-2023 ($72,095).

The deep and consistent discount suggests that investors in this market may be targeting distressed properties, off-market deals, or a segment of housing stock not typically sought by traditional homebuyers.

No properties were purchased in Q4, so the average price of $71,300 is a market-wide average rather than a reflection of specific transactions within the quarter.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 28.0% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a significant portion of the Edwards County market in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 7 of the 25 total SFRs sold, a market share of 28.0%.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by the smallest investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) made 100.0% of the quarter's investor purchases, while institutional investors (Tier 09) had no acquisitions.

Market growth was fueled exclusively by new entrants. All 7 properties purchased by landlords went to single-property investors (Tier 01), indicating an influx of new capital from first-time landlords rather than portfolio expansion by existing ones.

A total of 9 new landlord entities entered the market in Q4, each acquiring a single property, which further underscores the fragmented and small-scale nature of investor activity in the county.

The lack of purchasing from mid-size or institutional tiers highlights a market environment that is either unattractive to or inaccessible for larger-scale investment operations.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 98.4% of investor properties in Edwards County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Edwards County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), control 98.4% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The market is highly fragmented, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone constituting the largest segment, holding 109 properties, or 89.3% of the total investor portfolio.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1,000+ properties) have no footprint in Edwards County, owning 0.0% of the investor-held housing stock.

Mid-size investors are also exceedingly rare. Only two properties in the entire county are held by investors with portfolios larger than 10 units, representing just 1.6% of the investor market.

This ownership distribution reveals a market defined by local, small-scale investment, challenging the narrative of large corporate landlords dominating the rental space.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals own property in every active investor tier in Edwards County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the backbone of ownership across every active portfolio size in Edwards County. They own 100.0% of properties in the two-property and 6-10 property tiers.

Corporate ownership is minimal and concentrated at the smaller end of the spectrum. Companies hold only 8 of the 109 single-property portfolios (7.3%) and 4 of the 8 properties in the 3-5 unit tier (33.3%).

There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners. The data clearly shows that as portfolio sizes grow, individual ownership remains dominant, contrary to trends seen in larger metropolitan markets.

This pattern indicates that the investment environment in Edwards County is primarily accessible to or favored by individual capital, with limited scale or incentive for corporate entity formation.

The complete absence of company ownership in several tiers reinforces the characterization of the market as one driven by personal investment rather than structured corporate strategy.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip codes 62806, 62476, and 62815.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership in Edwards County is concentrated in a few key areas. The zip code 62806 leads in sheer volume, with 43 investor-owned properties.

Following closely in count is zip code 62476, with 36 investor properties, and 62815, with 13 properties.

However, the highest concentration or market penetration is found in zip code 62815, where investors own 10.8% of the SFR housing stock, significantly higher than the county average of 5.7%.

The second-highest ownership rate is in 62476 at 7.5%, indicating a dense cluster of rental properties in that area.

This distinction between high-volume areas (like 62806) and high-penetration areas (like 62815) suggests different market dynamics, potentially separating larger, more populous areas from smaller communities with a higher proportion of rental housing.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Edwards County are strong net buyers, acquiring properties at a 6.75-to-1 ratio in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals a clear trend of portfolio growth among landlords in Edwards County. Throughout 2025, investors have been strong net buyers, purchasing 27 SFR properties while only selling 4, a buy-to-sell ratio of 6.75x.

This aggressive acquisition posture is not new. In 2024, the trend was similar, with landlords buying 15 properties and selling just 2, for an even higher ratio of 7.5x.

Activity peaked in Q3 2025, with 11 properties purchased versus only 2 sold, demonstrating continued momentum in portfolio expansion during the year.

Institutional investors (1,000+ property tier) were completely absent from the transaction market, reporting zero buys and zero sells across all observed timeframes.

This sustained net buying from local landlords, coupled with zero institutional activity, signals strong local confidence in the rental market and a lack of interest from large-scale capital.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord activity represented 21.4% of all SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were involved in 9 of the 42 total SFR transactions in Edwards County, capturing a 21.4% share of market activity.

The entirety of this activity was driven by market entry. All 9 transactions were acquisitions by single-property landlords (Tier 01), highlighting that Q4 growth came exclusively from new investors.

These new landlords acquired properties at an average price of $71,300, reinforcing the significant discount investors achieve compared to traditional homebuyers in the area.

There was no inter-landlord trading during the quarter, with 0.0% of purchases sourced from other investors. This indicates that new entrants are buying from the general market (e.g., homeowners) rather than from a pool of existing rental properties.

The absence of transactions from any tier other than the smallest one demonstrates a market where portfolio building happens one property at a time, driven by new capital rather than strategic trades by established players.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Edwards County, Acquiring Properties at a 45.5% Discount
Holdings
In Edwards County, IL, landlords own 121 single-family properties, representing 5.7% of the total market. The landscape is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors, who hold 112 of these homes (92.6%), compared to just 14 (11.6%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Landlords in Q4 2025 purchased properties for 45.5% less than traditional homeowners, paying an average of $71,300 compared to the homeowner price of $130,909—a stark discount of $59,609 per property.
Activity
Investors were highly active in Q4 2025, purchasing 28.0% of all SFRs sold. This activity was driven entirely by new entrants, with 9 new single-property landlords joining the market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the investor market, owning 98.4% of all investor-held SFRs. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence with a 0.0% market share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate portfolios of all sizes in Edwards County. Companies maintain a small minority stake in the smallest tiers but never become the majority owners, highlighting a market devoid of large-scale corporate consolidation.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 27 properties versus selling only 4 in 2025 (a 6.75x buy/sell ratio). Institutional investors remained completely inactive, reporting zero transactions and showing no signs of entering or exiting the market.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Edwards County, IL, is fundamentally shaped by small, individual investors. Landlords own 121 properties, which constitutes 5.7% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly in the hands of individuals, who own 112 properties (92.6%), dwarfing the 14 properties (11.6%) held by companies. The market structure is highly fragmented, with mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) controlling 98.4% of investor-owned homes, while institutional capital is entirely absent.

Investor behavior in Edwards County is characterized by strategic, discounted acquisitions and consistent portfolio growth. In Q4 2025, landlords captured 28.0% of all home purchases, securing them at a remarkable 45.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners—paying just $71,300 on average. This activity is fueled by new entrants, as all 9 investor transactions in the quarter were by first-time landlords. Overall, investors are strong net buyers, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 6.75-to-1 in 2025, signaling strong local confidence and a clear trend of accumulation.

The key takeaway from this data is that the Edwards County rental market operates on a hyperlocal, small-scale model, distinct from national narratives of corporate dominance. The market's health and growth depend on the continuous entry of new individual landlords who are adept at finding undervalued properties. The substantial and persistent pricing advantage for investors suggests they are tapping into a segment of the market—potentially distressed or off-market sales—that is largely separate from the traditional homebuying process. This dynamic indicates a stable, ground-level rental market rather than one influenced by large-scale financial players.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 02:20 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyEdwards (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail