Nez Perce (ID) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Nez Perce (ID) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Nez Perce (ID)
12,754
Total Investors in Nez Perce (ID)
2,135
Investor Owned SFR in Nez Perce (ID)
2,083(16.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,623
SFR Owned
1,378
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
512
SFR Owned
742
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,083 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Nez Perce County, Paying 9.3% Premium Over Homeowners
Investors own 2,083 SFR properties in Nez Perce County, representing 16.3% of the market. This landscape is controlled by small, 'mom-and-pop' landlords who own 96.2% of all investor-held homes. In a notable market reversal, these investors paid 9.3% more than traditional homeowners in Q4 2025 and have remained strong net buyers, acquiring 1.8 properties for every one they sold.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,083 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a 66.2% majority.
The majority of investor properties, 1,610, were acquired with cash, compared to just 473 that are financed. Of the 2,135 total landlords, 1,623 are individuals, outnumbering companies by more than three to one.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors paid a $38,878 premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $457,295 per property.
This trend of paying more is not new; landlords paid a massive 35.3% premium in Q3 and a 50.1% premium in Q1. The only recent quarter where landlords secured a discount was Q2 2025, at 5.2%.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 11.4% of all SFR homes sold in Q4 2025, acquiring 17 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove virtually all this activity, accounting for 17 properties, or 94.4% of investor purchases. In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made zero acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 96.2% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 1,252 properties, representing 56.4% of the entire investor portfolio. Institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have a negligible footprint, owning just 2 properties, or 0.1% of the total.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors own 73.4% of single-property portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier.
Companies own 53.3% of properties in the 6-10 property tier and 60.8% in the 11-20 property tier. This crossover signifies a shift to more formalized business structures as portfolios grow.
Geographic Distribution
The 83501 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, containing 1,725 investor-owned properties.
While 83501 has the highest count, other zip codes have far higher saturation. The 83555 zip code leads with a 62.9% investor ownership rate, followed by 83540 at 36.6%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Nez Perce County are strong net buyers, acquiring 22 properties while selling only 12 in Q4 2025.
This net buyer trend has been consistent, with landlords acquiring 92 properties and selling just 28 throughout 2025. The full-year buy-to-sell ratio stands at a robust 3.28-to-1.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 9.2% of all SFR transactions in Q4, with 22 landlord-involved purchases.
New, single-property landlords paid the highest prices, averaging $508,571 per home. A notable 21.4% of these first-time investor purchases were acquired from other existing landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,083 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a 66.2% majority.
Detailed Findings

In Nez Perce County, investors hold a significant 16.3% of the single-family residential market, totaling 2,083 properties. This highlights a substantial rental and investment presence within the total market of 12,754 SFR homes.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 1,378 properties, constituting 66.2% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies own the remaining 742 properties (35.6%).

A clear preference for all-cash acquisitions is evident among Nez Perce County landlords. Cash-owned properties (1,610) outnumber financed ones (473) by a ratio of more than 3-to-1, signaling a well-capitalized investor base that is less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The market structure is built on a foundation of small-scale participants. There are 1,623 individual landlords compared to just 512 company landlords, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' character of real estate investment in the area.

Virtually the entire investor portfolio is dedicated to rentals, with 1,972 properties classified as rented. This near-total alignment of investor ownership with rental supply underscores the critical role these landlords play in the local housing ecosystem.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors paid a $38,878 premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $457,295 per property.
Detailed Findings

In a striking reversal of typical market dynamics, landlords in Nez Perce County paid significantly more than traditional homeowners in Q4 2025. The average landlord acquisition price was $457,295, a 9.3% premium over the homeowner average of $418,417, costing investors an extra $38,878 per home.

The fourth quarter premium is part of a larger, highly unusual trend throughout 2025. Landlords paid a staggering 35.3% premium ($156,366) in Q3 and an even larger 50.1% premium ($214,329) in Q1. This suggests investors are targeting specific, high-value properties or are willing to pay more to secure assets in a competitive market.

The only period of relief for investors came in Q2 2025, when they managed to acquire properties at a 5.2% discount, paying $406,093 compared to the homeowner's $428,425. This brief reversal highlights the volatility and atypical pricing pressures within the county's investment scene.

This pattern challenges the common assumption that investors' primary strategy is to find discounted properties. In Nez Perce County, the data indicates a willingness to outbid traditional buyers, possibly for properties with higher rental potential or other desirable investment characteristics.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 11.4% of all SFR homes sold in Q4 2025, acquiring 17 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 11.4% of the Nez Perce County housing market in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 17 of the 149 total SFR properties sold. This demonstrates a steady and significant demand from the investment sector.

The market's new entrants and small players were the primary drivers of acquisition activity. New single-property landlords purchased 10 homes, representing 55.6% of all investor buys for the quarter, signaling a healthy influx of first-time investors.

Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for 94.4% of all investor purchases. This concentration of activity in the smaller tiers underscores the grassroots nature of the local investment market.

In stark contrast to the active small investors, large-scale institutional buyers (1,000+ properties) were completely absent from the market, acquiring zero properties in Q4. This highlights a market dominated by local and regional players, not national corporations.

Activity was concentrated at the smallest end of the spectrum, with investors in the 1- and 2-property tiers collectively purchasing 15 of the 17 properties acquired by landlords, making up 83.4% of the quarter's investor activity.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 96.2% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Nez Perce County is overwhelmingly characterized by small-scale ownership. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, control a massive 96.2% of all investor-held SFRs.

First-time and single-property investors form the bedrock of the market. The '1 property' tier alone accounts for 1,252 properties, which is 56.4% of the entire investor portfolio. This demonstrates that the path to real estate investment in the county is highly accessible and popular.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) have a very limited presence, collectively owning just 7.7% of the investor-owned housing stock. The market clearly favors smaller, more localized investment strategies.

Institutional ownership is practically nonexistent. Investors in the '1,000+' tier hold only 2 properties, making up a mere 0.1% of the landlord portfolio. This data decisively refutes any narrative of large corporations dominating the local single-family rental market.

The ownership distribution is heavily skewed toward the smallest tiers. Landlords with 1-5 properties control a combined 89.4% of the market (1,984 properties), illustrating a highly fragmented and decentralized ownership landscape.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors own 73.4% of single-property portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of the Nez Perce County market, owning 932 of the 1,252 single-property landlord portfolios, a dominant 73.4% share. This highlights that the typical entry point into real estate investment is through personal, not corporate, ownership.

A distinct crossover point occurs as portfolios scale. While individuals are the majority in smaller tiers, companies become the dominant owner type in the '6-10 property' tier, holding a 53.3% majority (81 of 152 properties).

The trend of corporate ownership solidifies in larger portfolios. In the '11-20 property' tier, company ownership expands to a 60.8% share, indicating that investors professionalize and incorporate their holdings as their property count increases.

Even in the '3-5 property' tier, which is still dominated by individuals (66.1%), companies maintain a significant presence with 160 properties (33.9%). This shows that forming a company is a viable strategy even for relatively small-scale landlords.

This tiered ownership structure reveals a clear lifecycle for real estate investors in the county: starting as individuals and transitioning to corporate entities for liability, financing, or operational efficiency as they achieve greater scale.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 83501 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, containing 1,725 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Nez Perce County is highly concentrated, with the 83501 zip code serving as the clear hub. This single area contains 1,725 investor-owned properties, representing the vast majority of investment activity in the county.

While 83501 dominates by sheer volume, it has a relatively moderate investor ownership rate of 14.9%. This suggests it is a large, diverse market rather than one completely saturated by investors.

Several smaller, more rural zip codes exhibit the highest rates of investor penetration. The 83555 zip code stands out with an exceptionally high 62.9% investor ownership rate, indicating a market where rentals are the predominant form of housing.

The distinction between high-count and high-percentage areas is crucial. The top region by count (83501) does not appear in the top five by percentage, while the top region by percentage (83555) has a much smaller absolute number of properties. This highlights different investment strategies targeting urban density versus rural rental markets.

Other areas with high investor saturation include 83540 (36.6%), 83832 (30.9%), and 83545 (30.3%), all of which have investor ownership rates more than double that of the county's main hub.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Nez Perce County are strong net buyers, acquiring 22 properties while selling only 12 in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Nez Perce County are actively expanding their portfolios, demonstrating strong confidence in the local market. In Q4 2025, they were definitive net buyers, with 22 acquisitions compared to only 12 dispositions, a buy-to-sell ratio of 1.83x.

This accumulation strategy is a long-term trend, not a quarterly anomaly. Across the full year of 2025, landlords purchased 92 SFR properties and sold only 28, resulting in a net gain of 64 properties for the investor community.

The buying momentum has been consistent throughout the year. In Q3, the buy/sell ratio was an even more aggressive 5.25 (21 buys vs. 4 sells), and in Q2 it was 3.33 (30 buys vs. 9 sells), indicating sustained and powerful demand.

Comparing 2025 to 2024, the pace of acquisitions has slightly moderated, down from 105 buys in 2024 to 92 in 2025. However, the net buyer position remains firmly entrenched, signaling a stable and growing rental housing stock managed by investors.

No transaction data was available for institutional investors, but their minimal ownership footprint suggests their activity would not significantly impact these overall market trends, which are driven by smaller players.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 9.2% of all SFR transactions in Q4, with 22 landlord-involved purchases.
Detailed Findings

Landlords represented 9.2% of all transaction activity in Q4 2025, purchasing 22 of the 239 total SFRs that changed hands. This reflects a consistent and material investor presence in the market's liquidity.

Emerging investors are paying a premium to enter the market. The single-property (Tier 01) landlords recorded the highest average purchase price of any tier at $508,571, significantly higher than the average prices paid by more established small landlords.

The market shows signs of internal liquidity, with investors frequently buying from one another. In Q4, 21.4% of all properties bought by new (Tier 01) landlords were sourced from the existing landlord pool, indicating a healthy churn of investment properties.

Transaction volume was heavily concentrated among mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who accounted for 21 of the 22 landlord transactions. Institutional investors (Tier 09) registered zero transactions, reinforcing their passive role in the county.

The data suggests a dynamic where new investors are aggressively competing for assets, even paying top-of-market prices, and are comfortable acquiring properties that are already part of the rental stock from established landlords.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Dominated by Individuals, Nez Perce County's Small Landlords Are Net Buyers Paying Premiums Over Homeowners
Holdings
Investors own 2,083 single-family residential properties in Nez Perce County, representing 16.3% of the total market. The portfolio is primarily controlled by individual investors, who hold 1,378 properties (66.2%), compared to 742 (35.6%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In a notable market inversion, landlords paid an average of $457,295 in Q4 2025, a 9.3% premium over the $418,417 paid by traditional homeowners. This trend of paying more than homeowners was present in three of the last four quarters.
Activity
Landlords acquired 11.4% of all homes sold in Q4 (17 properties), with activity almost entirely driven by small investors. The market saw an influx of 14 new single-property landlord entities during the quarter.
Market Share
The Nez Perce County investor market is the domain of small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 96.2% of all investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a near-zero presence, owning just 0.1% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners once a portfolio grows to the 6-10 property tier (53.3% company-owned). This indicates a shift to formal business structures as investment scales.
Transactions
Landlords remain aggressive accumulators of property, acting as strong net buyers in Q4 with a 1.83x buy-to-sell ratio (22 buys vs. 12 sells). Institutional investors recorded no transactions, underscoring their lack of activity in the market.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Nez Perce County is fundamentally shaped by small, individual investors. Landlords own a significant 2,083 properties, or 16.3% of the county's SFR housing stock. This landscape is not defined by large corporations, but by local players; individual investors own a 66.2% majority of these homes. The market structure is highly fragmented, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (owning 1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 96.2% of investor-held properties, while institutional firms own a mere 0.1%.

Investor behavior in Nez Perce County defies national trends. Instead of seeking discounts, landlords have consistently paid premiums over traditional homeowners, including a 9.3% premium in Q4 2025. This suggests intense competition for desirable rental assets. Despite higher prices, investors remain confident, acting as strong net buyers with a 1.83-to-1 buy/sell ratio in the last quarter. This activity is driven by new and small-scale landlords, who accounted for 94.4% of all investor purchases in Q4, signaling a continuous influx of new capital from local investors.

The key takeaway for the Nez Perce County housing market is its stability and reliance on a broad base of local landlords. The market is insulated from the strategic shifts of large institutional investors and is instead fueled by individuals and small companies willing to pay market-rate or higher to expand their portfolios. This dynamic ensures a steady supply of rental housing but also adds a highly competitive, well-capitalized buyer segment that directly competes with traditional homebuyers, often at the higher end of the market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 02:01 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyNez Perce (ID)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions