Fremont (ID) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Fremont (ID) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Fremont (ID)
7,668
Total Investors in Fremont (ID)
4,296
Investor Owned SFR in Fremont (ID)
3,267(42.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,355
SFR Owned
2,326
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
941
SFR Owned
1,038
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,267 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Fremont County, Owning 98% of Investor Properties and Driving 57% of Q4 Sales
Investors own 3,267 SFR properties in Fremont County (42.6% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 98.1% versus a 0.0% share for institutional investors. In Q4, landlords were aggressive net buyers, purchasing 57.1% of all homes sold while paying a 26.9% premium over traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 3,267 properties in Fremont County, with individuals holding a dominant 71.2% share.
Cash is the preferred method of acquisition, with 2,386 properties owned outright compared to just 881 that are financed. The portfolio is overwhelmingly rental-focused, with 3,231 of the 3,267 investor-owned properties being non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors paid a significant 26.9% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $509,017 per property.
This investor premium of $107,912 more than homeowners defies national trends. While still substantial, this premium has narrowed considerably from a peak of 128.1% in Q1 2025, signaling a potential market cooldown.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, purchasing 44 properties and capturing 57.1% of all SFR sales.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of these acquisitions. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) made zero purchases, highlighting a market driven entirely by small-scale players.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords have near-total market control, owning 98.1% of all investor-held SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 75.9% of the investor-owned housing stock (2,582 properties). Institutional presence is effectively zero, with only one property held in a 1000+ portfolio, representing 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners in portfolios starting at the 6-10 property tier.
The shift from individual to corporate ownership is pronounced as portfolios scale; companies control 53.5% of the 6-10 property tier and a dominant 88.9% of the 11-20 property tier. Individuals remain the majority in all tiers with 5 or fewer properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated, with the 83429 zip code alone holding 2,247 properties.
The highest investor ownership rate is in the 83433 zip code at 74.4%. The 83429 zip code combines high volume with a high rate (61.9%), making it the clear epicenter of investment in Fremont County.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 13 properties for every one they sold in Q4.
This strong accumulation trend is consistent, with 66 properties bought versus only 5 sold in Q4. For the full year 2025, landlords maintained a similar pace, with 212 acquisitions and just 17 sales.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove over half the market in Q4, participating in 53.7% of all transactions.
Pricing strategies diverged sharply by experience; new single-property landlords paid an average of $539,130, while small landlords (3-5 properties) paid just $260,680. These more experienced landlords were also the only group to buy from other investors, sourcing 50% of their deals that way.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 3,267 properties in Fremont County, with individuals holding a dominant 71.2% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a significant footprint in Fremont County, owning 3,267 single-family properties, which constitutes a remarkable 42.6% of the total SFR market.

The investor landscape is dominated by 3,355 individual landlords who own 2,326 properties (71.2%), far outnumbering the 941 company landlords who own 1,038 properties (31.8%).

A strong indicator of market health and investor liquidity is the high prevalence of cash ownership, with 73.0% of the investor portfolio (2,386 properties) held free of financing.

The primary strategy for these investors is clear, as 3,231 of the 3,267 properties are classified as rented, confirming that the vast majority of the portfolio is actively generating rental income.

The data reveals a market comprised of many small players, as the ratio of individual landlords to the properties they own (1.4 properties per landlord) is much smaller than for companies (1.1 properties per company), which is an unusual finding that may suggest many single-property LLCs.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors paid a significant 26.9% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $509,017 per property.
Detailed Findings

In a striking departure from typical market behavior, landlords in Fremont County paid an average price of $509,017 in Q4 2025, a 26.9% premium over the traditional homeowner price of $401,105.

This premium translates to investors paying $107,912 more per property, suggesting intense competition for rental-grade assets or a focus on a different segment of the market than typical homebuyers.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners, while still high, has moderated throughout 2025, shrinking from an extraordinary 128.1% premium in Q1 to its current 26.9% level.

The Q4 average acquisition price for landlords ($509,017) is below the levels seen earlier in 2025 and the 2024 average ($607,295), indicating a potential slowdown in price escalation for investor purchases.

The significant premiums paid by landlords in every quarter of 2025 suggest a market where investors are aggressively competing and willing to outbid other buyer types to secure properties.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, purchasing 44 properties and capturing 57.1% of all SFR sales.
Detailed Findings

Investor demand was the primary driver of the Fremont County market in Q4, with landlords acquiring 44 of the 77 total SFRs sold, a commanding 57.1% market share.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who bought 100% of the properties acquired by investors, with zero participation from institutional buyers.

New market entrants made a major impact, as 42 new single-property landlord entities acquired 27 properties, accounting for 61.4% of all investor purchases in the quarter.

The acquisition activity was highly concentrated at the smallest scale, with single-property and two-property landlords together purchasing 34 properties, or 77.3% of the investor total.

The complete absence of institutional buying underscores that the market's current growth and momentum are fueled exclusively by small, local, or individual investors.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords have near-total market control, owning 98.1% of all investor-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor ownership structure in Fremont County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale landlords, with those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) controlling a massive 98.1% of the investor-owned SFR housing supply.

The market's foundation is built on single-property landlords, who alone own 2,582 properties, representing 75.9% of the entire investor portfolio.

In stark contrast to national narratives, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint in this market, with only a single property attributed to this tier, a 0.0% market share.

Mid-size investors (11-1,000 properties) also play a very minor role, collectively owning just 63 properties, which is only 1.9% of the total investor-owned stock.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented market with a low barrier to entry, defined by the activities of thousands of individual and small-scale investors rather than a few large corporations.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners in portfolios starting at the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, holding a majority share of over 71% in each of the tiers from one to five properties.

A distinct strategic crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where companies take over as the majority owner, holding 53.5% of the properties.

This trend toward corporate ownership accelerates significantly as portfolios grow, with companies owning a commanding 88.9% of properties in the 11-20 unit tier, suggesting corporate structures are preferred for scaling.

Even among single-property landlords, corporate entities have a meaningful presence, with companies owning 757 properties (28.5%) in this entry-level tier.

This pattern indicates that while individuals are the backbone of the market, scaling an investment portfolio beyond five properties in Fremont County is a strategy predominantly pursued through a corporate structure.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated, with the 83429 zip code alone holding 2,247 properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic concentration is a defining feature of the investor market in Fremont County, with the 83429 zip code containing 2,247 properties, which is 68.8% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county.

The 83433 zip code exhibits the highest investor penetration rate, where landlords own 74.4% of the entire SFR housing stock, indicating an extremely high level of rental activity in that specific area.

The top three zip codes by investor-owned property count (83429, 83420, and 83445) collectively hold 3,096 properties, representing 94.8% of the county's total investor portfolio.

This reveals that investor strategy is not evenly distributed but is instead highly targeted toward specific submarkets, with 83429 standing out as the primary hub for both volume and concentration.

The data shows a clear distinction between the leaders in raw count versus ownership percentage, but 83429 excels in both metrics, solidifying its status as the core investment zone.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 13 properties for every one they sold in Q4.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Fremont County are firmly in an accumulation phase, operating as decisive net buyers throughout 2024 and 2025.

The fourth quarter of 2025 saw a particularly strong buying surge, with 66 acquisitions against only 5 sales, resulting in a net portfolio expansion of 61 properties for investors.

This trend held for the entirety of 2025, during which landlords purchased 212 properties while selling only 17, demonstrating sustained confidence and a long-term hold strategy in the local market.

The buy-to-sell ratio of 13.2-to-1 in Q4 underscores the aggressive growth posture of the local investor community.

The consistency of this net buying behavior, which was also evident in 2024 (216 buys vs 41 sells), signals a stable and ongoing strategy of portfolio expansion among Fremont County's landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove over half the market in Q4, participating in 53.7% of all transactions.
Detailed Findings

Investors were the most active participants in the Q4 market, engaging in 66 of the 123 total SFR transactions for a majority share of 53.7%.

A significant price disparity exists between new and experienced investors. Landlords in the 3-5 property tier paid an average of $260,680, less than half the $539,130 average paid by new single-property investors.

Inter-landlord transactions were a key strategy for established small investors, with 50% of purchases by those in the 3-5 property tier coming from other landlords.

In contrast, 100% of properties acquired by new and two-property landlords came from the general market (non-landlords), suggesting they are primarily competing with traditional homebuyers.

All 66 landlord transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors, with zero activity from institutions, confirming that market liquidity and deal flow are entirely managed by small-scale players.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate Fremont County, Owning 98% of Investor Properties and Driving 57% of Q4 Sales.
Holdings
Landlords own 3,267 single-family residential properties, representing a significant 42.6% of the total market in Fremont County. Individual investors hold the vast majority with 2,326 properties (71.2%), compared to 1,038 (31.8%) for companies.
Pricing
Defying national trends, landlords paid a 26.9% premium over traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, an average of $107,912 more per property ($509,017 vs $401,105).
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 44 properties, accounting for 57.1% of all market sales. This activity was led by the entry of 42 new single-property landlords, with small "mom-and-pop" investors making up 100% of all landlord purchases.
Market Share
The investor market is overwhelmingly controlled by small landlords (1-10 properties), who own 98.1% of all investor-held housing. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible presence, holding just 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owner in portfolios of 6-10 properties and control 88.9% of portfolios in the 11-20 property range.
Transactions
Landlords are in a strong accumulation phase, acting as aggressive net buyers in Q4 with a 13.2-to-1 buy/sell ratio (66 buys vs 5 sells). Institutional investors were completely inactive, recording zero transactions.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Fremont County, ID is characterized by an exceptionally high concentration of small, individual investors. Landlords own a substantial 3,267 properties, representing 42.6% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. This landscape is dominated by "mom-and-pop" investors (1-10 properties), who control a staggering 98.1% of the rental portfolio, while institutional ownership is virtually non-existent at just 0.0%. Individual investors are the primary drivers, holding 71.2% of the properties compared to 31.8% for companies.

Investor behavior in Fremont County is defined by aggressive acquisition and a willingness to pay a premium for assets. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 57.1% of all homes sold and were strong net buyers with 66 acquisitions to only 5 sales. In a stark departure from national norms, these investors paid 26.9% more than traditional homeowners, suggesting intense competition for desirable rental properties. The market's growth is fueled by new entrants, with 42 new single-property landlords joining the market in the last quarter alone.

The key takeaway for the Fremont County housing market is its insulation from large-scale corporate investment and its reliance on local, small-scale capital. The high investor ownership rate, combined with a persistent premium paid by landlords, indicates a robust and competitive rental market. This dynamic suggests that housing affordability for traditional homebuyers may face pressure not from Wall Street, but from a large and active community of local investors deeply embedded in specific submarkets like the 83429 zip code, where investor penetration exceeds 61%.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 01:55 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyFremont (ID)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions