Caribou (ID) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Caribou (ID) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Caribou (ID)
2,406
Total Investors in Caribou (ID)
1,204
Investor Owned SFR in Caribou (ID)
885(36.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,138
SFR Owned
815
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
66
SFR Owned
106
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 885 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop investors dominate Caribou County, owning 96.1% of rentals and driving 100% of Q4 landlord purchases.
Investors own a significant 36.8% of the SFR market in Caribou County, ID, with individual landlords controlling 92.1% of those properties. In Q4, landlords purchased 37.5% of homes sold, paying 27.6% below homeowner prices. The market is defined by small, local investors, as institutional players were completely inactive.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 885 properties, 36.8% of the market, with individuals holding 92.1%.
Landlord portfolios are predominantly cash-owned, with 639 properties held in cash versus 246 financed. A full 98.5% of the investor-owned portfolio (872 of 885 properties) is designated as rented, non-owner-occupied housing.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 27.6% less than homeowners in Q4, a striking discount of $78,646.
The landlord purchasing advantage is highly volatile, swinging from a 38.6% premium paid in Q2 to a 50.3% discount in Q3 and a 27.6% discount in Q4. This indicates a market with low transaction volumes where individual deals can heavily skew quarterly averages.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 37.5% of all SFR properties sold in Caribou County during Q4.
Mom-and-pop investors were the only active buyers, accounting for 100% of landlord purchases. All 9 acquisitions were made by 13 new single-property landlords, while institutional investors made zero purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 96.1% of investor-owned homes in Caribou County.
Institutional investors have a negligible presence, owning just 2 properties, which constitutes only 0.2% of the investor market. The market is overwhelmingly dominated by single-property landlords, who alone own 78.8% of all investor-held SFRs.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual landlords dominate every small portfolio tier, owning 93.3% of single-property holdings.
Unlike larger urban markets, there is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners in Caribou County. Individuals maintain roughly 90% ownership even in the two-property and 3-5 property tiers.
Geographic Distribution
The 83276 and 83241 zip codes contain the most investor properties in Caribou County.
Investor ownership rates are highly concentrated in smaller zip codes, reaching 100.0% in 83283 and 72.1% in 83285. The 83217 zip code is a key investor hotspot, ranking in the top five for both total property count (183) and ownership percentage (59.6%).
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 15 properties and selling only 1 in Q4.
The pace of acquisitions has accelerated significantly, with 86 properties purchased in 2025 compared to 55 in 2024, a 56% increase in buying activity. The buy-to-sell ratio for 2025 stands at an overwhelming 21.5-to-1.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord activity accounted for 35.7% of all Q4 market transactions.
All 15 landlord transactions were made by new, single-property investors, who paid an average of $206,815. Notably, 0% of these purchases came from other landlords, indicating all properties were acquired from the traditional homeowner market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 885 properties, 36.8% of the market, with individuals holding 92.1%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a substantial 36.8% of the Single-Family Residential market in Caribou County, totaling 885 properties.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly composed of individuals, who own 815 properties (92.1% of the investor portfolio), while companies own just 106 properties (12.0%).

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, with 1,138 individual landlords compared to only 66 company landlords, a ratio of more than 17 to 1.

Cash is the preferred method for holding property, with cash-owned homes (639) outnumbering financed ones (246) by more than 2.5 to 1, indicating significant equity in the market.

The portfolio is heavily focused on generating rental income, as 872 of the 885 investor-owned properties (98.5%) are classified as rented.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 27.6% less than homeowners in Q4, a striking discount of $78,646.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords acquired properties at a significant 27.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $206,815 while homeowners paid $285,461.

This price advantage translates to an average savings of $78,646 per property, showcasing a strong ability to find undervalued assets.

The pricing gap has been extremely volatile throughout the year, highlighting the unique nature of a low-volume market. Landlords paid a $140,737 premium in Q2 before securing a massive $155,795 discount in Q3.

The substantial discounts in the second half of the year suggest landlords are targeting properties that may require renovations or are otherwise less appealing to the average homebuyer.

Despite the lack of purchases in most recent timeframes, the Q4 data indicates a clear pattern of investors buying at a deep discount relative to the broader market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 37.5% of all SFR properties sold in Caribou County during Q4.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a primary driver of market activity in Q4, acquiring 9 of the 24 total SFRs sold, a market share of 37.5%.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from the smallest investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of acquisitions.

Digging deeper, every single purchase was made by a new landlord entering the market, with 13 new entities each acquiring their first investment property.

There was a complete absence of activity from mid-size (11-1000 properties) and institutional (1000+) investors, who made zero purchases in Q4.

This trend signifies a grassroots expansion of the rental market, driven entirely by new, small-scale investors rather than the consolidation of portfolios by larger players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 96.1% of investor-owned homes in Caribou County.
Detailed Findings

The investor ownership structure in Caribou County is heavily concentrated at the smallest scale, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning a commanding 96.1% of the market.

Single-property landlords are the bedrock of the local rental market, holding 727 properties, or 78.8% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have a minimal footprint, controlling only 2 properties, which is just 0.2% of the total.

The next two largest tiers, two-property and 3-5 property landlords, hold 10.6% and 6.5% of the market respectively, reinforcing the dominance of small-scale ownership.

This distribution definitively shows that the local rental market is fueled by small, local investors, challenging any narrative of a corporate or institutional takeover.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual landlords dominate every small portfolio tier, owning 93.3% of single-property holdings.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the definitive owners across all major portfolio tiers, holding 93.3% of single-property portfolios (700 properties).

This pattern of individual dominance continues as portfolios grow, with individuals owning 89.4% of two-property portfolios and 88.9% of portfolios with 3-5 properties.

Companies represent a small fraction of ownership, holding just 50 single-property units and 11 two-property units, underscoring their limited role in the market.

The data shows no evidence of a 'crossover point' where corporate ownership begins to outpace individual ownership, a common trend in more institutionalized markets.

The ownership structure by type confirms that Caribou County's investor market is fundamentally comprised of private citizens rather than corporate entities.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 83276 and 83241 zip codes contain the most investor properties in Caribou County.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity is geographically concentrated, with the 83276 zip code holding the highest number of investor-owned properties at 409, representing 29.3% of that area's housing.

The zip code 83241 follows with 245 investor properties and a higher penetration rate of 38.5%.

Certain smaller zip codes exhibit extremely high investor concentration. The 83283 zip code is 100.0% investor-owned, and 83285 has a 72.1% investor ownership rate.

A notable hotspot for investors is the 83217 zip code, which ranks fourth for total count with 183 properties and third for ownership rate at a high 59.6%.

This data reveals a pattern where investors have a significant presence across the county but have achieved particularly high density in specific, smaller communities.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 15 properties and selling only 1 in Q4.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Caribou County are firmly in an accumulation phase, demonstrated by a 15-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 2025.

This net-buying behavior has been a consistent and accelerating trend. For the full year of 2025, landlords bought 86 properties while selling only 4, a ratio of 21.5 to 1.

This represents a significant increase in purchasing velocity compared to 2024, when 55 properties were bought and 9 were sold (a 6.1-to-1 ratio).

The data confirms that landlords are not only retaining their existing portfolios but are actively and rapidly expanding them.

Institutional investors recorded no transactions, meaning all accumulation activity is being driven by the smaller mom-and-pop segment of the market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord activity accounted for 35.7% of all Q4 market transactions.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a major force in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 15 of the 42 total SFR transactions, a share of 35.7%.

All 15 of these transactions were purchases made by landlords entering the market with their first property, at an average price of $206,815.

A critical finding is that none of these properties were bought from other landlords. This 0% inter-landlord trade rate means every investor acquisition directly reduced the housing stock available for traditional homeowners.

No transactions were recorded for any tier other than single-property landlords, highlighting a complete lack of activity from larger investors.

The transactional data confirms that the growth in Caribou County's rental market is fueled exclusively by new, small investors acquiring homes from the owner-occupied sector.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors dominate Caribou County, owning 96.1% of rentals and driving 100% of Q4 landlord purchases.
Holdings
Landlords own 885 SFR properties, representing a significant 36.8% of Caribou County's market. Individual investors are the overwhelming majority, holding 815 properties (92.1%) compared to just 106 (12.0%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q4, landlords acquired properties for 27.6% less than traditional homeowners, representing an average discount of $78,646 per property ($206,815 vs $285,461).
Activity
Landlords purchased 37.5% of all homes sold in Q4 (9 properties), with 100% of this activity driven by new, single-property landlords as 13 new entities entered the market.
Market Share
The investor market is controlled by small landlords (1-10 properties), who own 96.1% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+) have a minimal footprint with just 0.2% ownership.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate every portfolio tier, owning 93.3% of single-property portfolios. Unlike other markets, there is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners in Caribou County.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 15-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q4 (15 buys vs 1 sell). Institutional investors were completely inactive, with zero transactions recorded.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Caribou County, ID is defined by its high concentration of local, individual investors. Landlords own a substantial 885 SFR properties, accounting for 36.8% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This landscape is overwhelmingly shaped by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control 96.1% of the investor-owned market, while institutional firms have a negligible presence at just 0.2%. Ownership is deeply personal, with individual investors holding 92.1% of these rental homes, reinforcing a community-based rather than corporate-driven rental environment.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 points to a market fueled by new entrants. Landlords were highly active, purchasing 37.5% of all homes sold, and did so with a significant pricing advantage, paying 27.6% less than traditional homebuyers. Critically, 100% of this buying activity came from new landlords acquiring their first rental property. These investors are aggressive accumulators, posting a 15-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in the last quarter, and all of their purchases came from the homeowner market, directly converting for-sale homes into rental units.

The key takeaway for the Caribou County housing market is that its rental sector is a grassroots phenomenon. It is not being consolidated by large corporations but is expanding through the consistent entry of new, small-scale landlords. This trend suggests a steady, organic shift of housing stock from owner-occupancy to rental, driven by local individuals capitalizing on market opportunities. The absence of institutional players and the dominance of mom-and-pop owners indicate a stable, decentralized rental market poised for continued local growth.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 01:49 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCaribou (ID)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices