Benewah (ID) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Benewah (ID) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Benewah (ID)
3,514
Total Investors in Benewah (ID)
2,099
Investor Owned SFR in Benewah (ID)
1,447(41.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,951
SFR Owned
1,345
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
148
SFR Owned
158
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,447 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate 41.2% of Benewah County's Market, Securing 43.5% Discounts
Investors own 1,447 single-family homes in Benewah County, representing 41.2% of the total market, with individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling a staggering 99.8% of that portfolio. In Q4 2025, these investors were highly active, purchasing 44.8% of all homes sold while securing a massive 43.5% price discount compared to traditional homeowners. While small landlords are aggressively accumulating properties, the negligible institutional presence has shifted to net selling, signaling a complete divergence in strategy.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 41.2% of Benewah's SFR market; individual landlords hold 93.0%.
Cash is the preferred funding method, with cash-funded properties (1,116) outnumbering financed ones (331) by more than 3-to-1. The portfolio is almost entirely investment-focused, as 1,437 of the 1,447 investor-owned properties (99.3%) are non-owner-occupied rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords achieved a staggering 43.5% discount versus homeowners in Q4 2025.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners widened dramatically in Q4, jumping to 43.5% from 23.4% in Q3. This represents a $245,791 average discount per property in the final quarter of the year. The data does not provide a pricing breakdown between individual and company investors.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 44.8% of all single-family home purchases in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords were the only active investors, accounting for 100% of the 13 landlord purchases. In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made zero acquisitions during the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a near-total 99.8% of investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors have zero presence in the county, holding 0.0% of the market share. Price data by tier for Q4 shows single-property landlords paid an average of $319,718, but a direct comparison to non-existent institutional buyers is not possible.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every single landlord tier.
There is no tier where companies become the majority owners; even in the largest active tier (6-10 properties), ownership is split 50/50 between individuals and companies. Institutional-level companies own zero properties in the county.
Geographic Distribution
The 83861 zip code is Benewah County's investor hub with 712 properties.
The highest investor concentration is found in the 83866 zip code, where landlords own a staggering 88.4% of all SFRs. This contrasts with 83861, which has the highest volume but a more moderate 30.8% ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Small landlords are aggressive net buyers, while institutional investors are net sellers.
Landlords have maintained strong momentum, increasing their annual purchases from 91 in 2024 to 102 in 2025. In 2025, their buy-to-sell ratio was a dominant 17-to-1 (102 buys vs. 6 sells). Data on landlord-to-landlord sales percentage was not provided.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were a major market driver in Q4, participating in 36.5% of transactions.
Mom-and-pop (Tier 01) investors paid an average of $319,718 for properties. Notably, 0% of landlord acquisitions came from other landlords, indicating they are sourcing inventory from the traditional homeowner market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 41.2% of Benewah's SFR market; individual landlords hold 93.0%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Benewah County is exceptionally high, with landlords holding 1,447 properties, which constitutes a significant 41.2% of the total 3,514 single-family residential properties in the market.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals, who own 1,345 properties (93.0% of the investor portfolio), compared to just 158 properties (10.9%) owned by companies. This composition underscores a market driven by local, small-scale participants rather than large corporations.

Cash transactions heavily outweigh financing, with 1,116 properties owned outright versus 331 that are financed. This 3.37-to-1 ratio of cash-to-financed properties indicates that most local investors are well-capitalized and operate with low leverage.

The portfolio's purpose is clear: 99.3% of all investor-owned properties (1,437 of 1,447) are utilized as rentals. This near-total focus on non-owner-occupied units highlights a purely investment-driven strategy across the county.

The market structure consists of 2,099 distinct landlord entities, with 1,951 being individuals and 148 being companies. This large number of entities relative to the number of properties further confirms that the market is composed of many small landlords, not a few large ones.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords achieved a staggering 43.5% discount versus homeowners in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords acquired properties at an average price of $319,718, a massive 43.5% less than the $565,509 paid by traditional homeowners. This equates to a raw discount of $245,791 per property, showcasing a significant purchasing advantage for investors.

The pricing advantage for landlords intensified dramatically throughout the year. The discount swelled from a consistent range of 23-27% in the first three quarters to an unprecedented 43.5% in Q4, indicating a sharp divergence in the types of properties being targeted by investors versus homeowners at year-end.

Comparing year-over-year trends, the average landlord acquisition price actually decreased from $374,854 in 2024 to $332,706 in 2025. This suggests investors are successfully targeting lower-priced inventory or finding more distressed assets despite general market conditions.

The trend of widening discounts highlights an increasing strategic efficiency among landlords in Benewah County, who are becoming more adept at identifying and securing undervalued properties compared to the general market.

The Q4 discount of $245,791 is substantially larger than in previous quarters, such as Q3's $100,958 discount, signaling a key shift in market dynamics or acquisition strategy as the year concluded.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 44.8% of all single-family home purchases in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity was a powerful force in the Q4 2025 market, with landlords acquiring 13 of the 29 total SFRs sold, a market share of 44.8%. This demonstrates that nearly half of all sales activity was driven by investors.

The entirety of investor purchasing activity was driven by 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who bought all 13 properties. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) were completely absent from the market, making zero purchases.

A wave of new participants entered the market, with 17 new landlord entities purchasing single properties in Q4. This influx of first-time investors was the primary driver of market activity, signaling strong local interest in real estate investment.

The single-property tier was the most active, accounting for 11 of the 13 properties (84.6%) purchased by investors. This further emphasizes that market growth is originating from new, small-scale landlords rather than portfolio expansion by existing players.

The data reveals a market defined by grassroots-level investment, where the barrier to entry appears low and opportunities are being seized by new individual investors, in stark contrast to markets dominated by large-scale entities.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a near-total 99.8% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Benewah County is the epitome of a 'mom-and-pop' market, with landlords owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) controlling 99.8% of all investor-held single-family homes.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, alone accounting for 1,277 properties, or 85.4% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. This highlights the decentralized nature of rental ownership in the county.

In a direct refutation of the 'Wall Street landlord' narrative, institutional investors (Tier 09) have no footprint in Benewah County, with a 0.0% market share and zero properties owned.

Mid-size investors are also exceedingly rare. Landlords with portfolios of 11-50 properties collectively own just 3 properties, representing less than 0.2% of the market and reinforcing the dominance of very small-scale owners.

This extreme ownership concentration in the smallest tiers indicates a stable, locally-driven rental market where large-scale consolidation has not occurred and is not an active trend.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority owners in every single landlord tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain majority ownership across nearly all portfolio sizes, challenging the assumption that larger portfolios are typically corporatized. In Benewah County, individuals own 90.7% of single-property portfolios and 85.6% of two-property portfolios.

A crossover point where companies become the dominant owner type does not exist in this market. The closest to parity is the 6-10 property tier, where ownership is evenly split, with individuals and companies each holding 3 properties (50.0%).

The data shows a clear preference for individual ownership even as portfolios grow. This suggests that local investors prefer to hold assets under their own names rather than establishing formal corporate structures for their real estate holdings.

The overwhelming dominance of individuals in the most populous tier (single-property) is stark, with 1,199 properties held by individuals versus only 123 by companies, a ratio of nearly 10-to-1.

This pattern of individual ownership across tiers reinforces the character of Benewah County's market as being fundamentally driven by personal investment rather than corporate strategy.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 83861 zip code is Benewah County's investor hub with 712 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity is heavily concentrated in a few key areas, with the 83861 zip code hosting the largest number of investor-owned properties at 712. This single zip code accounts for nearly half of all investor properties in the county.

While 83861 leads in volume, other zip codes exhibit far higher market saturation. The 83866 zip code has the highest investor ownership rate at an astonishing 88.4%, indicating it is almost entirely a rental market.

A clear distinction exists between geographic strategies: some areas attract high volumes of investment (count), while others are defined by deep market penetration (percentage). For instance, 83830 has 240 investor properties but a 71.4% ownership rate, making it another saturation hotspot.

Three of the top five zip codes by investor ownership have rates exceeding 50% (83866 at 88.4%, 83830 at 71.4%, and 83851 at 54.5%). In these communities, investors are the majority owners of single-family homes.

This geographic analysis reveals that while investment is widespread, it is strategically targeted, creating micro-markets within the county that are fundamentally characterized by landlord ownership.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Small landlords are aggressive net buyers, while institutional investors are net sellers.
Detailed Findings

The overall investor market in Benewah County is in a strong accumulation phase. In 2025, landlords were aggressive net buyers, purchasing 102 properties while only selling 6, demonstrating high market confidence.

A significant strategic split has emerged between small and large investors. While the broader market is buying heavily, the small institutional segment (1000+ tier) acted as net sellers in 2025, with 1 purchase versus 2 sales.

The buying pressure from landlords has been consistent and growing, with acquisition counts rising from 91 in 2024 to 102 in 2025. This indicates sustained and increasing demand from the dominant mom-and-pop segment.

The buy/sell ratio highlights the scale of this accumulation. In Q3 2025, landlords bought 28 properties and sold only 1, a ratio of 28-to-1, signaling an aggressive push to expand portfolios.

The divergence between the net-buying mom-and-pop investors and net-selling institutional players, though the latter's volume is small, points to completely different outlooks on the future of the Benewah County market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were a major market driver in Q4, participating in 36.5% of transactions.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a critical role in market liquidity during Q4 2025, being a party in 19 of the 52 total transactions, for a 36.5% share of all market activity.

All 19 investor transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop landlords in the smallest tiers, with zero activity from institutional investors. This confirms that small investors were the sole source of landlord-driven transactions in the quarter.

A key finding is that investors sourced 0% of their new properties from other landlords. This lack of inter-landlord trading shows that investors are acquiring their inventory from the broader market, likely competing directly with traditional homebuyers.

New, single-property investors drove the bulk of the activity, accounting for 17 of the 19 transactions. Their average purchase price was $319,718, aligning with the discounted rates seen across the entire landlord segment.

The transaction data solidifies the market narrative: a dynamic and competitive environment where a steady stream of new, small-scale landlords actively acquire properties from the open market at a significant discount.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate 41.2% of Benewah County's Market, Securing 43.5% Discounts
Holdings
Landlords own 1,447 SFR properties, representing a substantial 41.2% of Benewah County's market. Ownership is overwhelmingly concentrated with individual investors, who hold 1,345 of these properties (93.0%), while companies own the remaining 10.9%.
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 43.5% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average discount of $245,791 per property by paying $319,718 compared to the homeowner average of $565,509.
Activity
Landlords were a dominant force in Q4 2025, purchasing 13 properties, which accounted for 44.8% of all market sales. This activity was driven by new entrants, with 17 new single-property landlord entities entering the market during the quarter.
Market Share
The market is almost exclusively controlled by small landlords (1-10 properties), who own 99.8% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence with a 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant force across all portfolio sizes, holding 93.0% of all investor properties. A crossover point where companies become the majority owner does not exist; even at the 6-10 property tier, ownership is split 50/50.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 17x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (102 buys vs 6 sells), signaling aggressive portfolio growth. The minimal institutional presence moved in the opposite direction, acting as net sellers (1 buy vs 2 sells).
Market Narrative

Benewah County's housing market is uniquely characterized by the deep penetration and overwhelming dominance of small-scale investors. Landlords own 1,447 single-family homes, a staggering 41.2% of the entire market. This landscape is defined not by corporations, but by individuals, who own 93.0% of the investor portfolio. The structure is hyper-localized, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a near-total 99.8% of investor-owned homes, while institutional firms with 1,000+ properties have absolutely no presence.

Investor behavior in Benewah County is both aggressive and strategic. In the last quarter, landlords acquired 44.8% of all homes sold, demonstrating their significant influence on market activity. Their primary strategy appears to be value-based acquisition, as evidenced by the massive 43.5% price discount they achieved compared to traditional homeowners in Q4. This trend is fueled by a constant influx of new entrants, with 17 new single-property investors joining the market in Q4 alone. The broader trend is one of accumulation, with landlords acting as strong net buyers throughout the year.

The key takeaway for the Benewah County housing market is that it operates as a model of decentralized, 'mom-and-pop' capitalism, directly countering the national narrative of corporate consolidation. The market is driven by local individuals who are adept at finding value and are continuously increasing their holdings. With investors sourcing new properties directly from the open market rather than trading amongst themselves, the primary dynamic is direct competition with homebuyers. This sustained, small-investor-led demand is the defining force shaping the local real estate ecosystem.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 01:43 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBenewah (ID)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price