Worth (GA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Worth (GA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Worth (GA)
5,900
Total Investors in Worth (GA)
1,663
Investor Owned SFR in Worth (GA)
1,633(27.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,468
SFR Owned
1,376
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
195
SFR Owned
266
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,633 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Worth County, Owning 27.7% of Homes and Paying 67% Less Than Homeowners
Investors own 1,633 single-family properties in Worth County, GA, representing 27.7% of the total market. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (94.9%), not institutions (0.1%). In Q4, investors captured 58.3% of all home sales by securing massive discounts, paying an average of 66.8% less than traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,633 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 84.3% share.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (1,439) versus financed (194), a ratio of more than 7-to-1. Of the total portfolio, 1,587 properties are explicitly rented, underscoring a strong focus on rental income generation across the county.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4, landlords paid an astonishing 66.8% less than homeowners, a discount of $249,199 per property.
This massive price gap is a persistent trend, with landlords securing discounts of 42.6% in Q3 and 79.3% in Q2. The average landlord purchase price in Q4 was just $124,000, compared to $373,199 for traditional homeowners, signaling a strategy of acquiring distressed or off-market properties.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, purchasing 7 of the 12 homes sold for a 58.3% market share.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 6 of the 7 investor purchases (85.7%). In contrast, institutional investors made zero acquisitions, showing their complete absence from the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 94.9% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 1,205 properties, comprising 72.5% of the entire investor portfolio. In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 2 homes, a negligible 0.1% market share.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 60.6% of holdings.
While individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, owning 89.4% of single-property holdings, a strategic shift to corporate structures occurs as portfolios grow. In the 6-10 property tier, individuals still hold a 62.3% majority, but the crossover happens in the next tier up.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 31791 zip code alone holding 818 investor-owned properties.
This single zip code accounts for 50.1% of all investor-owned SFRs in Worth County. The highest investor penetration rate is in zip code 31796, where 44.7% of all homes are investor-owned, signaling a heavily rental-focused submarket.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 21 properties in 2025 while only selling 2.
This results in a buy-to-sell ratio of 10.5-to-1 for the year, signaling a strong conviction to expand portfolios and hold assets. The trend was consistent throughout the year, with a 7-to-1 ratio in Q3 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 53.8% of all Q4 property transactions, with zero deals between investors.
All 7 landlord purchases were sourced from outside the investor community, meaning new rental stock was created. In these deals, smaller investors paid less, with single-property buyers averaging $102,500 versus $150,000 for mid-size buyers.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,633 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 84.3% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 27.7% of the 5,900 single-family residential properties in Worth County, GA, totaling 1,633 homes.

Individual investors are the backbone of the local rental market, owning 1,376 properties, which accounts for 84.3% of all investor-owned SFRs. In contrast, companies own just 266 properties (16.3%).

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, where 1,468 of the 1,663 total landlords (88.3%) are individuals, compared to 195 companies.

A defining feature of this market is the preference for cash purchases, with 1,439 properties owned outright versus only 194 that are financed. This indicates a well-capitalized investor base that is less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rentals, with 1,587 properties classified as rented, representing 97.2% of all investor holdings and confirming a clear non-owner-occupied strategy.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4, landlords paid an astonishing 66.8% less than homeowners, a discount of $249,199 per property.
Detailed Findings

A staggering price gap exists between what landlords and traditional homeowners pay in Worth County. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired properties for an average of $124,000, which is $249,199 (or 66.8%) less than the homeowner average of $373,199.

This trend of deep discounts is not isolated to the recent quarter. Landlords consistently paid significantly less throughout the year, with a 42.6% discount in Q3 ($151,143 vs. $263,455) and an even larger 79.3% discount in Q2 ($36,250 vs. $175,476).

The data suggests that investors are not competing for the same properties as traditional buyers. Instead, they appear to be operating in a separate sub-market, likely targeting distressed assets, off-market deals, or properties requiring significant renovation that are priced well below market rate.

Overall acquisition prices for landlords in 2025 ($133,382 avg) were lower than in 2024 ($240,300 avg), bucking typical appreciation trends and further highlighting their focus on discounted properties.

The consistent ability to acquire assets at such a low price point gives local investors a powerful competitive advantage in generating returns and expanding their portfolios.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, purchasing 7 of the 12 homes sold for a 58.3% market share.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 7 of the 12 total SFRs sold in Worth County, capturing a majority 58.3% of all transactions.

The market's growth is fueled by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 6 of the 7 investor purchases, representing 85.7% of landlord buying activity.

Three new landlords entered the market in Q4, each purchasing their first investment property. This, combined with activity from investors in the 3-5 property tier (3 properties), highlights the active role of emerging and small landlords.

Activity was concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum. Landlords with 1-5 properties accounted for 85.7% of all investor acquisitions this quarter.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were entirely absent from the market, making zero purchases and reinforcing that Worth County is a market shaped exclusively by local and regional players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 94.9% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Worth County is definitively controlled by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, hold a combined 94.9% of all investor-owned SFRs.

First-time and single-property investors are the most significant market segment, with 1,205 properties (72.5%) held in Tier 01. This demonstrates that the barrier to entry is low and the market is highly fragmented.

The scale of ownership drops off sharply after the first tier. Landlords with two properties hold 6.7% of the market, and those with 3-5 properties hold 11.6%.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) have a very limited presence, collectively owning just 5.0% of the investor-owned housing stock.

The narrative of large institutional investors is irrelevant in this geography. The 1,000+ property tier holds just 2 properties, accounting for only 0.1% of the market and posing no competitive threat to smaller landlords.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 60.6% of holdings.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges in ownership structure as portfolio sizes increase. While individual investors form the vast majority of the market, companies become the preferred entity for larger holdings.

Individuals dominate the smaller tiers, owning 89.4% of single-property portfolios and 83.8% of two-property portfolios. This highlights the accessible, non-corporate nature of market entry.

The transition toward corporate ownership begins in the 6-10 property tier, where company ownership rises to 37.7%.

The definitive crossover point occurs in the 11-20 property tier, where companies take a 60.6% majority stake, holding 43 properties compared to 28 held by individuals. This suggests that as operations scale, the legal and financial benefits of a corporate structure become critical.

This trend shows a lifecycle of investment in Worth County: individuals start small, and those who successfully scale beyond 10 properties are highly likely to formalize their operations under a company structure.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 31791 zip code alone holding 818 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic concentration is a defining characteristic of investor ownership in Worth County. The top five zip codes by property count hold 1,464 properties, representing 89.6% of the entire investor portfolio.

The 31791 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, containing 818 investor-owned homes. This is nearly half (50.1%) of the total investor inventory in the county.

While 31791 leads in raw numbers, the 31796 zip code exhibits the highest market saturation, with an investor ownership rate of 44.7%. This indicates an area where rental properties are a dominant feature of the housing market.

Several other zip codes also show high investor penetration, including 31705 (33.5%), 31795 (29.0%), and 31789 (29.0%), demonstrating that high rental density is not limited to a single area.

This clustering of investor assets suggests that landlords are targeting specific neighborhoods with favorable conditions for rental investments, such as lower acquisition costs, strong tenant demand, or specific property types.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 21 properties in 2025 while only selling 2.
Detailed Findings

The transaction history reveals a clear trend of accumulation among landlords in Worth County. For the full year of 2025, investors purchased 21 properties while only selling 2, establishing themselves as strong net buyers.

This buying behavior translates to a remarkable 10.5-to-1 buy/sell ratio for 2025, indicating a strategy focused on long-term holds and portfolio growth rather than short-term flipping.

This pattern was consistent in prior periods as well. In 2024, landlords bought 13 properties and sold only 1, showing sustained market conviction.

The most recent quarterly data from Q3 2025 confirms this trend, with 7 purchases against only 1 sale. This ongoing accumulation suggests landlords see continued opportunity and value in the local market.

Institutional transaction data is absent, which aligns with their negligible ownership and reinforces that all market momentum is driven by smaller, local investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 53.8% of all Q4 property transactions, with zero deals between investors.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a pivotal role in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 7 of the 13 total transactions for a 53.8% share of all activity.

A significant finding from the quarter is the lack of inter-landlord trading. One hundred percent of the 7 properties purchased by investors were acquired from non-landlords, indicating that investors are expanding the overall rental housing pool rather than just trading assets among themselves.

Pricing strategies in Q4 varied by investor size, with smaller landlords securing better prices. First-time landlords (Tier 01) paid the least at an average of $102,500 per property.

In contrast, the average purchase price increased with portfolio size. Landlords in the 3-5 property tier paid an average of $132,500, while the investor in the 11-20 property tier paid $150,000.

This pricing pattern suggests that smaller, perhaps more nimble, investors are more effective at sourcing the most deeply discounted properties in the county.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop investors dominate Worth County's rental market, controlling 95% of holdings and buying homes at a 67% discount.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,633 SFR properties, representing a significant 27.7% of the housing market in Worth County, GA. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 1,376 properties (84.3%), versus 266 (16.3%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q4, landlords demonstrated remarkable purchasing power by paying an average of 66.8% less than traditional homeowners, securing properties for $124,000 compared to the homeowner average of $373,199.
Activity
Investors were the primary buyers in Q4, acquiring 58.3% of all homes sold (7 of 12). This activity was driven by small players, including 3 brand-new landlords purchasing their first rental property.
Market Share
The market is the domain of small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 94.9% of all investor-owned housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint at just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the bedrock of the market, but a strategic shift occurs as portfolios grow, with companies becoming the majority owners (60.6%) in the 11-20 property tier.
Transactions
Investors are in a phase of aggressive accumulation, acting as strong net buyers with a 10.5-to-1 buy/sell ratio in 2025 (21 buys vs. 2 sells). Institutional investors were inactive, with zero recorded transactions.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Worth County, GA is characterized by a high concentration of investor ownership and the overwhelming dominance of small, individual operators. Investors control 1,633 homes, a significant 27.7% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This landscape is not shaped by Wall Street, but by main street; mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) command 94.9% of the investor-owned market, while institutional firms hold a mere 0.1%. Furthermore, 84.3% of these properties are owned by individuals, underscoring the fragmented and localized nature of the rental market.

Investor behavior is defined by aggressive acquisition and shrewd negotiation. In Q4 2025, landlords were the most active buyers, purchasing 58.3% of all homes sold. Their success hinges on a distinct strategy: targeting properties far below the typical consumer market rate. This resulted in an extraordinary 66.8% price discount compared to traditional homeowners in Q4. Transaction data further shows landlords are strong net buyers—with a 10.5-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in 2025—consistently adding to their portfolios by sourcing properties from outside the existing rental pool.

The key takeaway for Worth County is that a distinct, parallel housing market exists for investors. They are not competing for the same turn-key homes as traditional buyers but are instead capitalizing on opportunities in distressed, off-market, or value-add properties. This creates a market dynamic where small, well-capitalized local investors can thrive, continually expanding the supply of rental housing while operating in a price bracket that is largely inaccessible to or unseen by the average homebuyer. The market's future will be dictated by the ability of these small players to continue sourcing these discounted assets.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 10, 2026 at 11:53 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyWorth (GA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail