Quitman (GA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Quitman (GA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Quitman (GA)
820
Total Investors in Quitman (GA)
429
Investor Owned SFR in Quitman (GA)
347(42.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
390
SFR Owned
310
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
39
SFR Owned
39
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 347 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 98.3% of Quitman County's High-Penetration Investor Market
Investors own a significant 42.3% of the SFR market in Quitman County, with small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a near-total 98.3% of those holdings. In Q4, landlords purchased 50.0% of all available homes, paying an average of 72.7% less than traditional homeowners, while acting as aggressive net buyers throughout the year.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 347 properties, 42.3% of Quitman County's market, with individuals holding a dominant 89.3% share.
The vast majority of investor properties are held in cash (318 properties) compared to just 29 that are financed. Nearly all properties (345 of 347) are non-owner-occupied, confirming a strong rental focus.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Q4 landlord acquisitions came at a massive 72.7% discount, with an average price of $41,600 vs. $152,400 for homeowners.
The price gap is extremely volatile, swinging from a 62.1% landlord premium in Q3 to the 72.7% discount in Q4, likely due to low transaction volumes. Pricing data by owner type (individual vs. company) is not available for this county.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured half of the market in Q4, purchasing 3 of the 6 total SFRs sold (50.0% share).
Mom-and-pop landlords drove 100.0% of investor purchase activity. All 3 acquisitions were made by new, single-property landlords, while institutional investors made zero purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exert near-total control, owning 98.3% of all investor-held SFRs in Quitman County.
Single-property landlords alone account for a staggering 85.7% of the investor-owned housing stock. Institutional investors have zero ownership presence in this market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio tier, with no crossover point to company dominance.
Individuals own 91.2% of all single-property landlord portfolios and still represent at least 50% of ownership in every subsequent tier. There is no institutional company ownership in the county.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Quitman County is heavily focused in the 39854 zip code, home to 329 properties and a 42.9% ownership rate.
The 39854 zip code is the top sub-region by both property count and investor ownership percentage. The county's other zip code, 39867, has a much smaller count of 18 properties but still a high 34.0% rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Quitman County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 12.5 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
Throughout 2025, landlords purchased 25 properties while selling only 2. No institutional transaction data is available, and there is no information on landlord-to-landlord sales.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 30.0% of all Q4 market activity, conducting 3 of the 10 total transactions.
All 3 landlord transactions were by new mom-and-pop investors at an average price of $41,600. None of these properties were purchased from other landlords, indicating sourcing from the traditional homeowner market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 347 properties, 42.3% of Quitman County's market, with individuals holding a dominant 89.3% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a remarkably high penetration in Quitman County, owning 347 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 42.3% of the total market.

The market is overwhelmingly characterized by small, individual ownership, with 310 properties (89.3%) held by individuals compared to just 39 (11.2%) by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the landlord entity count, where 390 of the 429 total landlords are individuals.

A defining feature of this market is the preference for cash acquisitions, as 318 investor-owned properties are held free and clear, while only 29 are financed. This indicates low leverage and high equity among local investors.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals, with 345 of 347 properties classified as non-owner-occupied, underscoring the business focus of these holdings.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Q4 landlord acquisitions came at a massive 72.7% discount, with an average price of $41,600 vs. $152,400 for homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords acquired properties at an exceptionally low average price of $41,600, representing a $110,800 discount (72.7%) compared to the traditional homeowner price of $152,400. This suggests a focus on distressed or off-market assets.

Pricing behavior in this low-volume market is highly erratic. The significant Q4 discount follows a Q3 where landlords paid a $124,500 premium (62.1%) over homeowners, indicating opportunistic buying rather than consistent market-rate acquisitions.

Prior to Q3, landlords also secured deep discounts, including 93.3% in Q2 and 43.1% in Q1, reinforcing a pattern of purchasing properties far below the typical consumer market price.

The acquisition data shows minimal activity in recent years, with zero properties recorded as purchased in the full-year summaries for 2025 and 2024, highlighting that investor activity is sporadic and concentrated in specific quarters.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured half of the market in Q4, purchasing 3 of the 6 total SFRs sold (50.0% share).
Detailed Findings

Landlords represented a major force in the Q4 2025 market, acquiring 50.0% of all single-family homes sold, totaling 3 properties out of a market total of 6.

The entirety of this investor activity came from the smallest players, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounting for 100.0% of purchases.

Growth in the investor market is coming from new entrants, as all 3 landlord purchases were made by new, single-property (Tier 01) investors.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) had no presence in the acquisition market, purchasing zero properties during the quarter.

This activity profile underscores a hyper-local market dynamic where growth is driven by new, small-scale individuals rather than the expansion of large, existing portfolios.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exert near-total control, owning 98.3% of all investor-held SFRs in Quitman County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Quitman County is completely dominated by small landlords, with Tiers 01-04 (1-10 properties) collectively owning 98.3% of the entire investor portfolio.

Market ownership is exceptionally concentrated at the very bottom, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone holding 306 properties, or 85.7% of the total investor-owned supply.

The next largest tier, two-property landlords, holds a distant 9.2% of properties, showing a rapid drop-off in portfolio size.

Mid-size and large investors are virtually non-existent, with all tiers above 10 properties combined accounting for less than 2% of the market.

Confirming the market's local character, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a 0.0% market share, indicating they have no footprint in the county.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio tier, with no crossover point to company dominance.
Detailed Findings

Unlike in larger markets, individual investors maintain majority ownership across every single portfolio tier in Quitman County, signaling a lack of corporate consolidation.

In the foundational single-property tier, individuals own 280 of the 306 properties (91.2%).

This trend continues into larger portfolios, with individuals owning 88.2% of two-property portfolios and 70.0% of portfolios in the 3-5 property range.

Even in the largest local tier (51-100 properties), the single property recorded is owned by an individual.

The closest companies come to parity is in the 6-10 property tier, where ownership is split 50.0% / 50.0%, but this is based on a total of only two properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Quitman County is heavily focused in the 39854 zip code, home to 329 properties and a 42.9% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

The vast majority of investor-owned properties in Quitman County are located within a single zip code, 39854, which contains 329 of the 347 total investor-owned SFRs.

This area also boasts the highest investor penetration rate in the county at 42.9%, making it the clear epicenter of rental housing activity.

The county's other primary zip code, 39867, has a significantly smaller investor presence with 18 properties.

Despite the lower count, the 39867 zip code also shows a very high investor concentration with a 34.0% ownership rate.

This pattern indicates that while investor ownership is high across the county, the scale of that investment is heavily weighted toward one specific geographic area.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Quitman County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 12.5 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors are in a strong accumulation phase, demonstrated by a 2025 transaction record of 25 purchases versus only 2 sales, making them definitive net buyers.

This results in a buy-to-sell ratio of 12.5-to-1 for the year, signaling strong confidence in the local market and a prevalent buy-and-hold strategy.

This net buyer behavior was consistent during active periods, such as in Q2 2025 when investors bought 12 properties and sold just 2.

The lack of any transaction data for institutional investors aligns with their 0.0% ownership share, confirming that all market dynamics are driven by smaller, local players.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 30.0% of all Q4 market activity, conducting 3 of the 10 total transactions.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a significant driver of Q4 sales activity, with landlord purchases accounting for 30.0% of all SFR transactions in Quitman County.

All investor transaction volume was concentrated in the single-property (Tier 01) category, indicating market growth came exclusively from new entrants.

The average purchase price for these new investors was $41,600, a figure substantially below typical market rates that suggests a focus on value-add or distressed properties.

The data shows 0% of these acquisitions were sourced from other landlords, meaning new investors are buying from traditional homeowners rather than from a secondary investor market.

Institutional investors were completely inactive, recording zero transactions in Q4.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Quitman County's investor market is defined by small landlords, who own 42.3% of all SFRs with 98.3% control of investor holdings.
Holdings
Landlords own 347 single-family properties in Quitman County, representing a high market penetration of 42.3%. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who hold 310 properties (89.3%), compared to 39 (11.2%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q4, landlords acquired properties for 72.7% less than traditional homeowners, an average discount of $110,800 per property ($41,600 vs. $152,400).
Activity
Landlords purchased 50.0% of all homes sold in Q4 (3 properties), with 100% of this activity coming from 3 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-monopoly share of 98.3% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have zero presence (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors constitute the majority of owners across all portfolio sizes in Quitman County, with no crossover point where companies become the dominant entity type.
Transactions
Investors are aggressive net buyers with a 12.5x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 (25 buys vs. 2 sells). There was no transaction activity from institutional investors.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Quitman County, Georgia, is a portrait of hyper-local, small-scale ownership with an exceptionally high market footprint. Investors own 347 properties, a remarkable 42.3% of the county's single-family housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly controlled by 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who command 98.3% of all investor-held assets. Ownership is skewed heavily toward individuals (89.3%) over companies, and institutional firms with over 1,000 properties have absolutely no presence.

Investor behavior is characterized by opportunistic acquisition and long-term holding. In Q4, landlords were responsible for 50.0% of all home purchases, with all activity coming from new, single-property investors buying at a steep 72.7% discount compared to homeowners. This suggests a strategy focused on distressed or value-add properties. Throughout 2025, landlords have been aggressive net buyers, acquiring 12.5 properties for every one they sold, signaling strong confidence in the local market.

Ultimately, Quitman County represents a market completely detached from national institutional trends. Its rental housing supply is provided by local individuals operating on a small scale. The high ownership rate combined with low acquisition prices points to a market with unique economic conditions, likely offering affordable rental options but also indicating a potential lack of traditional financing or new development. The health and direction of this market are tied directly to the financial capacity and strategies of its resident investors, not outside corporate capital.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 10, 2026 at 11:28 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyQuitman (GA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail