Pierce (GA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Pierce (GA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Pierce (GA)
6,345
Total Investors in Pierce (GA)
1,642
Investor Owned SFR in Pierce (GA)
1,546(24.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,520
SFR Owned
1,399
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
122
SFR Owned
154
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,546 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Pierce County with 97.5% Ownership, Aggressively Expanding Portfolios as Net Buyers
Investors own 24.4% of the SFR market in Pierce County, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a near-total 97.5% of that stock. In Q4, landlords acquired 20.0% of homes sold, and across 2025 maintained a strong net-buyer position with a 4.82x buy-to-sell ratio, while institutional investors remained completely absent from the market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,546 SFR properties in Pierce County, with individual landlords controlling a dominant 90.5%.
A staggering 89.1% of investor properties are owned outright in cash (1,378 properties), not financed. The portfolio is highly focused on generating rental income, with 97.4% of all landlord-owned properties being rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In a sharp Q4 reversal, landlords paid a shocking 86.1% premium, averaging $523,625 versus homeowners at $281,367.
This $242,258 premium per property breaks a strong trend of landlord discounts seen in previous quarters, which included a 57.9% discount in Q3 and a 47.6% discount in Q2. The Q4 spike is likely a low-volume anomaly.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 20.0% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, purchasing 7 of the 35 homes that changed hands.
Mom-and-pop landlords drove 100% of this activity. The quarter saw 5 new single-property landlords enter the market, while institutional investors made zero purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 97.5% of all investor-owned SFRs in Pierce County.
Single-property landlords alone make up the vast majority of the market, owning 1,145 properties (71.7% of the total). In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence in the county.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Price comparison data between individual and company buyers by tier is not available for this market.
Companies become the majority owners at the 21-50 property tier, holding 55.6% of properties in that segment. Below this threshold, individual investors dominate, owning over 78% of the stock in all smaller tiers.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in the 31516 zip code, which holds 1,164 investor-owned properties.
The highest investor ownership rate is found in the 31518 zip code at 31.0%. The 31557 zip code shows a strong balance, ranking second for property count (304) and third for ownership rate (28.3%).
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Pierce County are aggressive net buyers, purchasing 4.82 properties for every one they sold during 2025.
This net buyer stance was consistent, with a 2.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 and a 3.25x ratio in 2024. Acquisition volume more than doubled from 39 purchases in 2024 to 106 in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 19.0% of all Q4 market transactions, accounting for 8 of the 42 total property sales.
New, single-property buyers paid a high average of $523,625 for their homes. Notably, 0% of investor purchases came from other landlords, indicating they are sourcing deals from the traditional homeowner market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,546 SFR properties in Pierce County, with individual landlords controlling a dominant 90.5%.
Detailed Findings

Investor penetration in Pierce County is significant, with landlords owning 1,546 single-family residential properties, which accounts for 24.4% of the total market.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual "mom-and-pop" landlords, who own 1,399 properties, accounting for 90.5% of the investor portfolio. Companies hold the remaining 154 properties (10.0%).

Cash is the preferred acquisition method for investors in this market, with 89.1% of investor-owned homes (1,378 properties) owned outright, compared to just 168 properties that are financed.

The investor portfolio is highly focused on rentals, with 1,506 properties classified as rented, representing 97.4% of all landlord-owned homes, indicating a clear strategy of generating rental income.

The ownership base is highly fragmented, with 1,642 distinct landlords owning the 1,546 properties. This high ratio of landlords to properties underscores the prevalence of single-property owners and co-ownership arrangements.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In a sharp Q4 reversal, landlords paid a shocking 86.1% premium, averaging $523,625 versus homeowners at $281,367.
Detailed Findings

In a dramatic market reversal, landlords paid a staggering 86.1% premium for properties in Q4 2025, with an average acquisition price of $523,625 compared to $281,367 for traditional homeowners.

This premium of $242,258 per property marks a sharp departure from the established pattern of landlord discounts observed throughout the rest of the year.

Earlier in 2025, landlords consistently secured properties for less than homeowners, obtaining discounts of 57.9% in Q3, 47.6% in Q2, and 54.6% in Q1.

The sudden price spike in Q4 is likely influenced by a very low volume of transactions, where a few high-value acquisitions can heavily skew the average price, rather than a fundamental shift in broad market strategy.

This volatility highlights how low transaction volumes can create extreme outliers in pricing data, contrasting with the more stable, high-discount environment seen when activity was higher in previous quarters.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 20.0% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, purchasing 7 of the 35 homes that changed hands.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a notable force in the Pierce County market during Q4 2025, acquiring 7 of the 35 total SFR properties sold, which constitutes a 20.0% market share.

The entirety of investor purchasing activity this quarter came from small-scale "mom-and-pop" landlords (Tiers 01-04), who bought all 7 properties.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely absent from the buying market in Q4, making zero acquisitions and underscoring the market's reliance on smaller players.

The market saw an influx of new investors, with 5 new single-property landlords entering the market. These new entrants were responsible for acquiring 4 properties, representing 57.1% of all investor purchases.

Activity was concentrated at the smallest end of the spectrum, with single-property investors (4 properties) and small landlords with 3-5 properties (3 properties) accounting for all transactions.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 97.5% of all investor-owned SFRs in Pierce County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Pierce County is unequivocally controlled by small-scale operators, with "mom-and-pop" landlords (owning 1-10 properties) holding 97.5% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, owning 1,145 properties, which accounts for a remarkable 71.7% of the total investor portfolio.

Ownership concentration dissipates rapidly as portfolio size increases; landlords with two properties hold 9.8%, and those with 3-5 properties hold 11.9%.

Mid-size investors have a minimal footprint, with tiers from 11 to 1000 properties combined accounting for less than 3% of the total investor-owned housing stock.

There is a complete absence of large-scale institutional ownership (1000+ properties) in this market, reinforcing its character as being driven entirely by local and small-scale investment.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Price comparison data between individual and company buyers by tier is not available for this market.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across nearly all portfolio sizes, maintaining majority ownership in all tiers up to 20 properties.

The crossover point where corporate ownership becomes dominant occurs in the small-medium 21-50 property tier, where companies own 55.6% of the properties (5 homes).

In the foundational single-property tier, individual landlords own a commanding 93.3% of the 1,145 properties, highlighting their role in market entry.

As portfolios grow, company ownership steadily increases, rising from 6.7% in the single-property tier to 21.5% in the 6-10 property tier.

An interesting anomaly exists in the 11-20 property tier, where individual ownership share (89.3%) is higher than in the tier below it, suggesting this size is a sweet spot for sole proprietors before corporate structures become more common.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in the 31516 zip code, which holds 1,164 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

The vast majority of investor-owned properties in Pierce County are concentrated in a single zip code, 31516, which contains 1,164 properties, representing 75.3% of the entire county's investor portfolio.

While 31516 leads overwhelmingly in volume, the highest market penetration is in the 31518 zip code, where investors own 31.0% of the housing stock.

The 31557 zip code demonstrates a strong combination of both volume and penetration, with the second-highest count of investor properties (304) and the third-highest ownership rate (28.3%).

This data reveals a clear distinction between where investors own the most properties (volume) and where their presence is most saturated relative to the market size (rate).

After the top two zip codes, investor ownership drops off significantly, with the third-ranked zip code by count (31551) having only 33 properties, highlighting the hyper-concentration of activity.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Pierce County are aggressive net buyers, purchasing 4.82 properties for every one they sold during 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Pierce County are consistently in an accumulation phase, acting as strong net buyers across all recent timeframes.

In Q4 2025, investors bought twice as many properties as they sold (8 buys vs. 4 sells), demonstrating continued demand even at year's end.

The net buying activity was even more pronounced over the full year, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 4.82 for 2025 (106 buys vs. 22 sells) and 3.25 for 2024 (39 buys vs. 12 sells).

Investor acquisition velocity more than doubled year-over-year, jumping from 39 purchases in all of 2024 to 106 purchases in 2025, signaling a major ramp-up in investment.

Institutional transaction data is not available, but the overall market trend is one of aggressive and sustained purchasing by the existing landlord base.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 19.0% of all Q4 market transactions, accounting for 8 of the 42 total property sales.
Detailed Findings

Investors represented a significant portion of Q4 market activity, participating in 19.0% of all transactions, with 8 of the 42 total SFRs sold going to a landlord.

All 8 of these transactions were conducted by "mom-and-pop" investors, with no activity from institutional-scale players.

New entrants in the single-property tier drove Q4 pricing with an average purchase price of $523,625, an unusually high figure that skewed the overall landlord average.

Investors sourced 100% of their Q4 acquisitions from outside the existing landlord pool, as none of the 8 properties purchased were sold by another investor.

This suggests that landlords are not just trading properties among themselves but are actively acquiring inventory from traditional homeowners or other sources, adding to the overall rental stock.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Pierce County's investor market is controlled by mom-and-pop landlords, who own 97.5% of stock and remain aggressive net buyers.
Holdings
In Pierce County, investors own 1,546 SFR properties, representing 24.4% of the market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors (1,399 properties, 90.5%), with companies owning just 154 properties (10.0%).
Pricing
In a Q4 anomaly driven by low volume, landlords paid 86.1% more than homeowners, averaging $523,625 per property versus $281,367. This reversed a year-long trend of securing properties at significant discounts of up to 57.9%.
Activity
Landlords acquired 20.0% of homes sold in Q4 (7 properties), with 100% of that activity from small investors. The market welcomed 5 new single-property landlords, highlighting continued grassroots entry.
Market Share
Small "mom-and-pop" landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control, owning 97.5% of all investor housing. Institutional investors (1000+) have zero presence in the county.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 21-50 property tier. This crossover signifies where professionalization begins to scale.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 4.82x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 (106 buys vs. 22 sells), indicating aggressive accumulation. Institutional investors were completely inactive, with zero recorded transactions.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Pierce County, Georgia is defined by the dominance of small, independent operators. Investors control a significant 24.4% of the single-family housing stock, totaling 1,546 properties. This portfolio is almost entirely in the hands of "mom-and-pop" landlords (owning 1-10 properties), who control a staggering 97.5% of all investor-owned homes. Individual investors own 90.5% of these properties, leaving a minimal 10.0% share for companies and a complete absence of large-scale institutional players.

Investor behavior is characterized by aggressive accumulation and a preference for cash transactions. In 2025, landlords acted as strong net buyers with a 4.82-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio. In the final quarter, they acquired 20.0% of all homes sold. A low-volume Q4 produced a pricing anomaly where landlords paid a surprising 86.1% premium over homeowners, a stark reversal from the deep discounts seen earlier in the year, likely driven by a few high-value acquisitions from new market entrants.

The key takeaway for the Pierce County housing market is its insulation from national institutional trends. The market's health and the rental supply are dependent on the financial stability and continued investment of thousands of small-scale individuals, not corporate entities. This structure suggests a market with deep local roots but also potential fragmentation. The high concentration of ownership in the 31516 zip code further indicates that investor impact, both positive and negative, is not evenly distributed across the county.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 10, 2026 at 11:27 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyPierce (GA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional