McDuffie (GA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the McDuffie (GA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in McDuffie (GA)
6,732
Total Investors in McDuffie (GA)
1,616
Investor Owned SFR in McDuffie (GA)
1,814(26.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,464
SFR Owned
1,540
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
152
SFR Owned
276
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,814 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate McDuffie County with 91.9% Ownership Amidst a Stalled Q4 Market
Investors own 1,814 SFR properties, representing a significant 26.9% of the market in McDuffie County, GA. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (91.9%), while investor purchasing activity ground to a halt in Q4 2025. For the year, landlords were strong net buyers, but Q4 saw an equal number of buys and sells, signaling a major market cooldown.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,814 SFR properties, with individual landlords controlling a dominant 84.9% share.
The portfolio is overwhelmingly cash-based, with 1,653 properties owned outright versus just 161 financed. Nearly the entire portfolio is rental-focused, with 1,757 properties (96.9%) designated as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlord acquisition pricing is highly volatile, swinging from a 49.3% premium over homeowners in Q3 to a 20.7% discount in Q2.
No landlord purchases were recorded in Q4 2025, halting any price comparison for the quarter. In Q3, landlords paid a surprising $72,000 premium, while in Q2 and Q1 they secured substantial discounts of $65,544 and $23,275 respectively.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investors captured 20.0% of the quiet Q4 market with a single property purchase.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) and institutional investors (1000+) made zero purchases. The quarter's entire investor activity came from just two mid-size entities in the 51-100 property tier acquiring one property.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate ownership, controlling 91.9% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, owning 1,195 properties, which accounts for 64.8% of the total investor portfolio. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+) have a negligible presence, owning just 9 properties or 0.5% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate small portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier.
Individuals own 93.4% of single-property portfolios, showing they are the primary entry point for new landlords. The strategic shift to corporate ownership happens decisively at the 11-20 property tier, where companies control 60.9% of the properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated in zip code 30824, which holds 1,452 properties, 80.0% of the county's total.
While zip code 30806 has a 100.0% investor ownership rate, it only contains 3 properties. The most significant markets for both volume and penetration are 30824 (1,452 properties, 26.7% rate) and 30808 (338 properties, 28.7% rate).
Historical Transactions
Landlords were strong net buyers in 2025, but activity stalled in Q4 with an equal number of buys and sells.
For the full year 2025, landlords were aggressive net buyers with an 8-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio, acquiring 16 properties while selling only 2. This momentum evaporated in Q4, where they bought and sold just 2 properties each, signaling a market pause.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 28.6% of Q4 transactions, with all activity consisting of inter-landlord trades.
The 2 landlord transactions were both purchases from other landlords, indicating 100% of investor buying came from existing rental stock. Mom-and-pop and institutional tiers recorded zero transactions, with all activity isolated to the 51-100 property tier.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,814 SFR properties, with individual landlords controlling a dominant 84.9% share.
Detailed Findings

Real estate investors hold a significant footprint in McDuffie County, GA, owning 1,814 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, which constitutes 26.9% of the total SFR market.

The market is dominated by small, individual investors rather than corporations, with individuals owning 1,540 properties (84.9%) compared to 276 (15.2%) owned by companies.

This individual dominance is further reflected in the entity count, where 1,464 of the 1,616 total landlords are individuals, a staggering 90.6%.

Investor portfolios are heavily weighted towards outright ownership, with 1,653 properties held in cash, representing a more than 10-to-1 ratio over the 161 properties that are financed.

The strategic focus of these investors is clear, as 1,757 of their 1,814 properties are rented, indicating that 96.9% of the investor-owned portfolio is actively used as rental housing.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlord acquisition pricing is highly volatile, swinging from a 49.3% premium over homeowners in Q3 to a 20.7% discount in Q2.
Detailed Findings

Landlord purchasing activity came to a complete stop in Q4 2025, with zero properties acquired, making a direct price comparison to homeowners impossible for the quarter.

Pricing behavior in the preceding quarters reveals extreme volatility rather than a consistent trend. In Q3 2025, landlords paid a notable premium of 49.3%, with an average price of $217,900 compared to the homeowner average of $145,900.

This contrasts sharply with Q2 2025, where landlords secured a 20.7% discount, paying $250,789 while homeowners paid an average of $316,333.

The first quarter of 2025 showed a more modest landlord discount of 11.9% ($171,725 vs. $195,000), highlighting the lack of a predictable pricing advantage in this market.

Overall price appreciation for investor-acquired properties is significant, with the 2025 average price of $225,850 far exceeding both the 2024 average ($81,250) and the 2020-2023 average ($122,821).

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Investors captured 20.0% of the quiet Q4 market with a single property purchase.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity slowed dramatically in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring just 1 of the 5 total SFRs sold, capturing a 20.0% market share.

The most active segments of the investor market, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) and institutional buyers (1000+), were completely inactive, recording zero purchases.

This indicates a freeze in new market entrants, as the single-property tier, which typically represents new landlords, had no activity.

The entirety of Q4 investor buying was driven by a single transaction from a medium-large investor (51-100 property portfolio), an anomaly in a market where this tier owns only 0.2% of all investor properties.

This lack of broad participation suggests a significant market pause or a potential shift in investor sentiment heading into the new year.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate ownership, controlling 91.9% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in McDuffie County is defined by the dominance of small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (owning 1-10 properties) control a massive 91.9% of all investor-held SFRs.

First-time and single-property landlords are the primary market force, with 1,195 properties held in this tier alone, representing 64.8% of the entire investor portfolio.

The market structure is highly fragmented, with mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) holding a combined 7.6% of properties.

Contrary to narratives of corporate consolidation, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a minimal impact, owning just 9 properties, which translates to a mere 0.5% market share.

This distribution underscores a market driven by local, small-scale capital rather than large, centralized investment firms.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate small portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier.
Detailed Findings

A clear ownership pattern emerges across portfolio sizes: individuals are the gateway to real estate investing, while companies are the vehicle for scaling.

Individuals overwhelmingly control the entry-level tiers, owning 93.4% of single-property portfolios and 85.2% of two-property portfolios.

The tipping point occurs when a portfolio grows beyond 10 properties. In the 11-20 property tier, companies take majority control for the first time, owning 39 properties (60.9%).

This trend continues into the next bracket, with companies owning 54.4% of properties in the 21-50 tier, solidifying the pattern of incorporating as an investment strategy matures.

Even in the 6-10 property tier, individuals maintain a strong 64.1% majority, indicating the decision to incorporate is a significant strategic step rather than a gradual shift.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated in zip code 30824, which holds 1,452 properties, 80.0% of the county's total.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in McDuffie County is not evenly distributed; it is heavily concentrated in a single area. The 30824 zip code is the undisputed epicenter, containing 1,452 investor-owned SFRs, which accounts for 80.0% of the entire investor portfolio in the county.

The two most significant sub-markets are zip codes 30824 and 30808, which not only have the highest property counts but also boast high investor penetration rates of 26.7% and 28.7% respectively.

An interesting outlier is zip code 30806, which shows a 100.0% investor ownership rate. However, with only 3 total SFR properties in the area, this is a statistical anomaly rather than a sign of a major investment hub.

The data highlights a clear geographic strategy among investors, focusing their capital and efforts primarily within the 30824 zip code.

The high concentration in specific zip codes suggests targeted investment strategies based on local factors like school districts, rental demand, or property values.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords were strong net buyers in 2025, but activity stalled in Q4 with an equal number of buys and sells.
Detailed Findings

Over the course of 2025, landlords in McDuffie County were in a clear accumulation phase, operating as strong net buyers. They purchased 16 properties while only selling 2, resulting in a net gain of 14 properties for their portfolios.

This aggressive buying trend, which also contrasts with 2024's more modest net buying (7 buys vs. 2 sells), came to an abrupt halt in the final quarter of 2025.

In Q4, market dynamics shifted dramatically to a neutral position, with landlords buying 2 properties and selling 2 properties, resulting in zero net portfolio growth.

This sharp deceleration from a strong net-buyer position to a neutral stance in Q4 suggests a significant cooling of investor demand or a wait-and-see approach entering the new year.

Data on institutional transaction activity was not available, but the overall market trend points towards a sharp slowdown led by the smaller investors who dominate the area.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 28.6% of Q4 transactions, with all activity consisting of inter-landlord trades.
Detailed Findings

Despite a quiet market, landlords participated in 2 of the 7 total SFR transactions in Q4 2025, accounting for a notable 28.6% share.

All investor purchase activity during the quarter was internal. The 2 properties bought by landlords were also sold by landlords, signifying a 100% landlord-to-landlord transaction rate.

This suggests a market of portfolio churning or consolidation among existing players, rather than investors acquiring new properties from traditional homeowners.

Transaction activity was highly concentrated, with both transactions occurring within the medium-large (51-100 properties) tier, a group that owns less than 1% of the total investor portfolio.

The complete absence of transactions from the dominant mom-and-pop tiers (01-04) or the institutional tier (09) further highlights the unusual and stagnant nature of the Q4 market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate McDuffie County with 91.9% Ownership Amidst a Paused Q4 Market
Holdings
Landlords own 1,814 SFR properties, representing 26.9% of the market in McDuffie County, GA. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 1,540 properties (84.9%) compared to 276 (15.2%) for companies.
Pricing
Landlord pricing was highly volatile throughout the year, swinging from a 49.3% premium over homeowners in Q3 to a 20.7% discount in Q2. No landlord purchases were recorded in Q4, preventing a quarterly price comparison.
Activity
Investor purchasing ground to a halt in Q4, with landlords acquiring just 1 property, representing 20.0% of all sales. Critically, no new landlords entered the market, as single-property tier purchases were zero.
Market Share
Small-scale mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exert overwhelming control, owning 91.9% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+) have a negligible footprint, with just 0.5% of the market share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary force in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners once a portfolio scales to the 11-20 property tier.
Transactions
For the year, landlords were strong net buyers with an 8x buy/sell ratio (16 buys vs 2 sells). However, this momentum vanished in Q4, which ended in a neutral position (2 buys vs 2 sells), indicating a significant market cooldown.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in McDuffie County, GA is fundamentally a story of local, small-scale ownership. Investors command a substantial 26.9% of the single-family housing stock, totaling 1,814 properties. This landscape is not shaped by Wall Street, but by main street; mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 91.9% of the investor-owned inventory, while institutional firms hold a mere 0.5%. Ownership is primarily individual-led (84.9%), with investors typically incorporating into companies only after their portfolios grow beyond 10 properties.

Investor behavior in 2025 was a tale of two halves. The year was characterized by aggressive accumulation, with landlords operating as strong net buyers. However, this momentum completely dissipated in Q4, which saw purchasing activity grind to a halt and transaction volume flatline. The quarter's only investor acquisitions were inter-landlord trades, suggesting a market focused on internal churning rather than expansion. Pricing behavior was erratic throughout the year, with landlords paying significant premiums in one quarter and securing deep discounts in another, defying a consistent trend.

The key takeaway is that McDuffie County's investor market is highly fragmented and locally dominated, with a heavy concentration in the 30824 zip code. The abrupt halt in purchasing and net buying activity in Q4 signals a potential market inflection point or a period of uncertainty among the small investors who form the backbone of this market. This slowdown, particularly the lack of new, single-property landlords entering the space, suggests a cautious outlook for investor-led housing demand in the near term.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 10, 2026 at 11:15 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyMcDuffie (GA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price