Dougherty (GA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Dougherty (GA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Dougherty (GA)
23,469
Total Investors in Dougherty (GA)
4,788
Investor Owned SFR in Dougherty (GA)
6,719(28.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,979
SFR Owned
4,374
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
809
SFR Owned
2,374
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 6,719 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Dougherty County's Investor Market, Buying at a 42.5% Discount as Institutions Exit
Investors own 28.6% of SFRs in Dougherty County, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a massive 77.4% share versus a mere 0.2% for institutions. In Q4, landlords were strong net buyers, acquiring 32.5% of all sales at a 42.5% discount to homeowners, while institutional investors were net sellers, signaling a clear shift toward smaller, local ownership.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 6,719 SFR properties in Dougherty County, with individuals holding a 65.1% majority.
Cash is the dominant financing method, with 5,765 properties owned outright versus just 954 that are financed. A significant 96.1% of the investor portfolio (6,457 of 6,719 properties) is operated as rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Dougherty County landlords paid 42.5% less than homeowners in Q4, a staggering discount of $100,438 per property.
The significant Q4 discount of 42.5% is the narrowest it has been all year, down from a peak of 55.6% in Q1, suggesting the pricing advantage is slightly tightening. Landlord acquisition prices have dropped dramatically year-over-year, from an average of $212,574 in 2024 to $111,494 in 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 32.5% of all SFR properties sold in Dougherty County during Q4, totaling 54 purchases.
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) were the driving force, responsible for 76.4% of all landlord acquisitions (42 properties). In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) made zero purchases this quarter as 30 new, single-property landlords entered the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 77.4% of all investor-owned SFRs in Dougherty County.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 16 properties, or 0.2% of the investor market. Single-property landlords are the largest single group, holding 46.7% of all investor-owned homes. The data shows institutions have been net sellers over the past year.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, signaling the crossover from individual to corporate strategies.
The crossover from individual to company-dominated portfolios occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where companies hold a 51.2% share. Below this, individuals are dominant, holding 87.3% of single-property portfolios. In larger portfolios (21-50 properties), companies control a staggering 90.9% of the homes.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Dougherty County is highly concentrated, with three zip codes (31705, 31707, 31701) holding 87.5% of investor SFRs.
The zip code 31701 has the highest investor penetration at 36.3%, meaning more than one in every three SFRs is investor-owned. The top three regions by both raw count and ownership percentage are the same, indicating deep saturation in these core areas.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Dougherty County are strong net buyers, acquiring 2.6 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
This net buying trend contrasts sharply with institutional investors (1000+), who were net sellers in 2025, selling 7 properties while only buying 5. Overall landlord buying activity accelerated throughout 2025, with Q3 seeing the highest volume at 142 purchases.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 29.5% of all Q4 SFR transactions in Dougherty County, totaling 65 acquisitions.
New, single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $177,058. In contrast, mid-sized investors (11-50 properties) paid significantly less (averaging $54,250 - $73,333) and sourced a high percentage (75-80%) of their deals from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 6,719 SFR properties in Dougherty County, with individuals holding a 65.1% majority.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a significant presence in the Dougherty County market, owning 6,719 Single-Family Residential properties, which constitutes 28.6% of the total SFR housing stock.

The market is defined by individual ownership, with 4,374 properties (65.1%) held by 'mom-and-pop' style investors, compared to 2,374 properties (35.3%) held by companies.

This individual dominance is even more pronounced at the entity level, where 3,979 individual landlords make up 83.1% of all investors in the area, compared to just 809 company entities.

Financial stability appears high among local investors, as an overwhelming 85.8% of their properties (5,765) are owned with cash, free of financing. Only 14.2% of the portfolio (954 properties) is leveraged with debt.

The primary strategy for these investors is clear, with 6,457 properties (96.1%) classified as rented or non-owner-occupied, confirming the portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to providing rental housing.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Dougherty County landlords paid 42.5% less than homeowners in Q4, a staggering discount of $100,438 per property.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Dougherty County demonstrate a powerful pricing advantage, acquiring properties in Q4 2025 for an average of $135,639, a staggering 42.5% less than the $236,077 paid by traditional homeowners. This amounts to a $100,438 discount per home.

This deep discount has been a consistent feature throughout 2025, with landlords securing remarkable savings of 55.6% in Q1, 45.6% in Q2, and 50.2% in Q3, highlighting a structural difference in the assets they target or their negotiation power.

While still massive, the 42.5% Q4 discount is the smallest recorded in 2025, indicating the extreme pricing advantage may be slightly normalizing from its peak earlier in the year.

Investor acquisition prices have fallen sharply year-over-year. The average price paid by landlords for the full year 2025 ($111,494) is nearly 48% lower than the average from 2024 ($212,574), indicating a strategic shift towards lower-cost properties.

Current acquisition prices signal a market correction from the boom years, with the 2025 average of $111,494 sitting well below the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $143,401.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 32.5% of all SFR properties sold in Dougherty County during Q4, totaling 54 purchases.
Detailed Findings

Investors represented a major force in the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 54 of the 166 total SFRs sold and capturing a significant 32.5% market share.

Acquisition activity was overwhelmingly driven by small-scale investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (portfolios of 1-10 properties) accounting for 42 of the 54 purchases, representing 76.4% of all investor buying.

The market saw a healthy influx of new participants, as the single-property tier was the most active segment. A total of 30 new landlord entities entered the market, acquiring 22 properties between them.

In a clear sign of divergent strategies, institutional-grade landlords (1000+ properties) were completely absent from the purchasing market, acquiring zero properties in Q4.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) contributed to the quarter's activity by purchasing the remaining 12 properties (23.6%), though their volume was less than one-third of that from the mom-and-pop segment.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 77.4% of all investor-owned SFRs in Dougherty County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Dougherty County is defined by small landlords. The mom-and-pop segment (1-10 properties) collectively owns 5,333 properties, which is 77.4% of all investor-held SFRs, demonstrating their foundational role in the local rental market.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, alone accounting for 3,217 properties. This represents 46.7% of the total investor portfolio, highlighting the market's deep reliance on first-time or small-scale investors.

The narrative of large corporate landlords is not reflective of Dougherty County's reality. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) own a mere 16 properties, which is only 0.2% of the investor-owned housing stock.

Mid-size investors (11-1000 properties) hold the remaining 22.4% of the portfolio. While a significant portion, their combined ownership is less than a third of the mom-and-pop category's total.

This distribution confirms a highly fragmented market structure, with thousands of small owners rather than a few large, consolidated players. The top four tiers, all within the mom-and-pop definition, comprise the vast majority of investor properties.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, signaling the crossover from individual to corporate strategies.
Detailed Findings

A distinct shift in ownership structure occurs as portfolios grow. While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, companies become the majority owners for the first time in the 6-10 property tier, holding a 51.2% share of the homes.

Individual investors are the overwhelming majority in the smallest tiers, owning 2,822 (87.3%) of single-property portfolios and 419 (79.1%) of two-property portfolios, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' nature of the market's entry point.

As portfolio size increases, company ownership becomes nearly absolute. In the 21-50 property tier, companies own 538 of the 592 properties, a commanding 90.9% share, indicating that scaling is primarily pursued through a corporate structure.

The 3-5 property tier represents a transition zone, where individuals still hold a strong majority (67.2%) but company presence (32.8%) becomes much more significant than in the entry-level tiers.

The data suggests a clear pattern: investors often begin as individuals and then incorporate as their portfolios and operational complexity grow, typically once they surpass the 5-property mark.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Dougherty County is highly concentrated, with three zip codes (31705, 31707, 31701) holding 87.5% of investor SFRs.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity is hyper-concentrated in Dougherty County, with the top three zip codes—31705, 31707, and 31701—collectively accounting for 5,881 of the 6,719 investor-owned properties, representing a massive 87.5% of the total.

Investor penetration in these core areas is remarkably high. Zip code 31701 leads with 36.3% of its SFR stock owned by investors, followed closely by 31705 (34.6%) and 31707 (30.0%).

Unlike in many markets, the areas with the highest number of investor properties are also the areas with the highest percentage of investor ownership. This alignment suggests investors are doubling down on established rental submarkets rather than expanding into new ones.

A steep drop-off in investor presence occurs outside the top three zip codes. The fourth-ranked zip, 31721, has just 831 investor properties and a 14.3% ownership rate, significantly lower than the top-tier areas.

This geographic focus reveals that the Dougherty County rental market is effectively defined by the dynamics within these three core zip codes, which are central to any investment strategy in the region.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords in Dougherty County are strong net buyers, acquiring 2.6 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

The overall investor market in Dougherty County is in a strong accumulation phase. In 2025, landlords purchased 338 SFRs while selling only 130, making them significant net buyers with a buy-to-sell ratio of 2.6 to 1.

In a stark divergence, institutional-grade investors (1000+ properties) are moving in the opposite direction. They were net sellers in 2025, divesting 7 properties while acquiring only 5, a reversal of their net-buyer position from 2024.

This reveals two completely different market strategies playing out simultaneously: smaller, local landlords are expanding their portfolios, while the largest national players are trimming their holdings in the area.

Landlord purchasing activity gained momentum through 2025, peaking in Q3 with 142 buys before settling to 65 in Q4. This represents a marked increase from 2024, when buys (158) and sells (157) were nearly balanced for the entire year.

The combination of strong net buying from the overall landlord pool and net selling from institutions confirms that small- to mid-sized investors are the primary force driving the market's growth.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 29.5% of all Q4 SFR transactions in Dougherty County, totaling 65 acquisitions.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a role in nearly a third of all market activity, with their 65 purchases accounting for 29.5% of the 220 total SFR transactions in Q4 2025.

A clear pricing hierarchy exists among investors. New, single-property landlords paid the most, with an average purchase price of $177,058, which is more than triple the average price of $54,250 paid by investors in the 11-20 property tier.

Mid-size investors (11-100 properties) appear to be sourcing deals directly from other landlords. These tiers show a very high percentage of purchases from fellow landlords (75% to 100%), and their acquisition prices are the lowest, suggesting they are buying portfolios or distressed rental assets.

In contrast, new landlords (Tier 01) sourced only 33.3% of their properties from other landlords, indicating they are more likely competing with homeowners on the open market and thus paying higher, near-retail prices.

Small investors (Tiers 01-04) drove the vast majority of transactions, with their 51 acquisitions making up 78% of all investor purchases, while institutional investors had zero transactions.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Dougherty County with 77.4% ownership, expanding portfolios while institutions retreat as net sellers.
Holdings
Landlords own 6,719 SFR properties, representing a significant 28.6% of Dougherty County's market, with individual investors holding a 65.1% majority (4,374 properties) over companies' 35.3% (2,374 properties).
Pricing
Landlords paid 42.5% less than traditional homeowners in Q4, securing an average discount of $100,438 per property ($135,639 vs. $236,077).
Activity
In Q4, landlords purchased 32.5% of all SFR sales (54 properties), with mom-and-pop investors driving the activity and 30 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 77.4% of all investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own a minuscule 0.2% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios (87.3% of single-property homes), but companies take majority control in portfolios starting at 6-10 properties (51.2% share).
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 2.6x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (338 buys vs 130 sells), but institutional investors are net sellers (5 buys vs 7 sells).
Market Narrative

The investor footprint in Dougherty County, GA is substantial, with landlords owning 6,719 single-family residential properties, or 28.6% of the total market. This landscape is overwhelmingly shaped by small-scale operators; mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 77.4% of the investor-owned housing stock, while institutional firms (1000+ properties) have a negligible 0.2% share. Ownership is further defined by individuals, who hold 65.1% of properties, solidifying the market's grassroots character.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 points to continued accumulation, with landlords acquiring 32.5% of all homes sold. They wield significant pricing power, purchasing properties for 42.5% less than traditional homeowners on average. Transaction data reveals a stark divergence in strategy: the broader landlord market is in a heavy buying phase (a 2.6-to-1 buy/sell ratio in 2025), while the few institutional players are actively divesting their small local portfolios.

The key takeaway for the Dougherty County housing market is the clear divergence between local and national players. The market's growth and rental supply are being driven by an influx of new, individual landlords and the expansion of existing small portfolios. Meanwhile, the retreat of institutional capital, however small, suggests the market dynamics may not align with large-scale investment models. This highly concentrated, mom-and-pop-driven ecosystem points to a stable but fragmented rental market for the foreseeable future.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 10, 2026 at 10:44 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyDougherty (GA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail