Costilla (CO) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Costilla (CO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Costilla (CO)
1,564
Total Investors in Costilla (CO)
1,535
Investor Owned SFR in Costilla (CO)
1,139(72.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,410
SFR Owned
999
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
125
SFR Owned
146
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,139 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Costilla County's Investor Market: Dominated by Small Landlords Amid a Complete Q4 Activity Freeze
Investors own a significant 72.8% of the Single-Family Residential market in Costilla County, with small 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling 100% of this portfolio. While landlords were active net buyers earlier in the year, the market came to a standstill in Q4 2025, with zero purchases or sales recorded, signaling a dramatic pause in investor activity.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,139 SFR properties in Costilla County, with individuals holding 87.7%.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (1,009 properties) versus financed (130 properties). The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 1,137 properties classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlord acquisition pricing in Costilla County shows extreme volatility with no consistent discount.
Landlord pricing swung from a 32.9% discount ($103,750) in Q2 to a 68.4% premium ($102,536) in Q3 compared to homeowners. Due to zero Q4 activity, no recent price comparison is available.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlord purchasing activity completely halted in Q4 2025, with zero acquisitions recorded.
Investors, including both mom-and-pop and institutional tiers, made 0 purchases in the fourth quarter, a stark drop from previous activity. This represents 0.0% of all landlord purchases for the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 100% of investor-owned SFRs in Costilla County.
Single-property landlords alone own 1,049 properties, representing 90.8% of the entire investor portfolio. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence in this market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owner in the 3-5 property tier.
Companies own 51.6% of properties in the 3-5 unit tier and increase their dominance to 90.0% in the 6-10 unit tier. Individuals, however, own 89.6% of all single-property rentals.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated in zip code 81152, with 473 properties owned.
Investor ownership rates are extremely high in specific areas, peaking at 88.2% in zip code 81126 and 85.7% in 81138. The top three zip codes by count (81152, 81133, 81123) contain over 1,100 investor-owned properties combined.
Historical Transactions
Landlords were strong net buyers in 2025 before activity froze, with a 7x buy-to-sell ratio for the year.
In Q3 2025, landlords purchased 11 properties while selling only 2. For the full year, they acquired 21 properties and sold just 3, showing aggressive portfolio growth before the Q4 halt.
Current Quarter Transactions
The landlord transaction market completely froze in Q4 2025, with zero properties bought or sold.
Landlords represented 0.0% of the 0 total transactions in the quarter. This lack of activity was universal across all investor tiers, from single-property owners to larger landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,139 SFR properties in Costilla County, with individuals holding 87.7%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a substantial 72.8% of the total Single-Family Residential market in Costilla County, controlling 1,139 out of 1,564 properties.

Individual 'mom-and-pop' investors are the overwhelming majority, owning 999 properties, which constitutes 87.7% of the investor-owned SFR housing stock, compared to just 146 properties (12.8%) owned by companies.

The ownership structure is mirrored in the landlord entity count, where 1,410 individual landlords vastly outnumber the 125 company landlords operating in the county.

Cash is the predominant financing method, with 1,009 investor properties owned outright. This represents nearly nine times the number of properties that are financed (130), indicating a low reliance on leverage among local investors.

The portfolio is almost entirely composed of rental properties, with 1,137 rented units, underscoring the deep rental market penetration by investors in the area.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlord acquisition pricing in Costilla County shows extreme volatility with no consistent discount.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing prices in Costilla County exhibit extreme volatility rather than a consistent discount. In Q3 2025, landlords paid an average of $252,536, a staggering 68.4% premium over the traditional homeowner price of $150,000.

This trend sharply reverses the pattern from Q2 2025, where landlords acquired properties at an average price of $211,250, representing a significant 32.9% discount compared to the homeowner average of $315,000.

In Q1 2025, landlords also paid a substantial premium, with an average price of $335,167 compared to the homeowner average of $209,800—a 59.8% price difference.

The data from 2020-2023 shows a much lower historical acquisition price for investors at $189,215, suggesting significant price appreciation in the market over the last two years.

No landlord purchases were recorded in Q4 2025, preventing any recent price comparison and highlighting a freeze in market activity.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlord purchasing activity completely halted in Q4 2025, with zero acquisitions recorded.
Detailed Findings

The investor purchase market in Costilla County came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring zero SFR properties.

This lack of activity means investors accounted for 0.0% of all SFR purchases in the market during the final quarter of the year.

Activity was nonexistent across all investor sizes, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) responsible for 0.0% of the quarter's acquisitions.

Similarly, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) made no purchases, contributing 0.0% to the quarterly total.

The data indicates a total pause in market entry and portfolio growth for all landlord tiers at the end of 2025.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 100% of investor-owned SFRs in Costilla County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Costilla County is exclusively controlled by small-scale landlords, with those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) commanding 100.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords are the bedrock of the market, holding 1,049 properties, which alone accounts for a remarkable 90.8% of the total investor portfolio.

The next largest tiers are minimal in comparison: two-property landlords own 65 properties (5.6%), and those with 3-5 properties hold just 31 properties (2.7%).

Institutional investors, often a focus of market discussions, have no footprint in Costilla County, with the 1,000+ property tier (Tier 09) owning 0.0% of the housing stock.

This market structure reveals a complete absence of large-scale corporate ownership, with the rental market entirely in the hands of small, local investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owner in the 3-5 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of the Costilla County market, owning 89.6% of single-property rentals (943 properties) and 82.1% of two-property portfolios (55 properties).

A distinct crossover point occurs in the 3-5 property tier, where companies take a slight majority, owning 16 properties (51.6%) compared to the 15 properties (48.4%) held by individuals.

Company dominance becomes absolute in larger portfolios, as they own 90.0% of properties in the 6-10 unit tier, signaling a clear strategy of using corporate structures for portfolio growth.

Despite this crossover, the vast number of single-property landlords means that, overall, individuals own the vast majority of investor properties in the county (999 properties).

This pattern indicates that while individuals are prevalent at the entry-level, scaling a rental portfolio in Costilla County is strongly correlated with incorporation.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated in zip code 81152, with 473 properties owned.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Costilla County is geographically concentrated, with just three zip codes accounting for the vast majority of the portfolio. The 81152 zip code leads with 473 investor-owned properties.

Following closely are zip codes 81133 with 433 properties and 81123 with 201 properties, demonstrating significant investor focus in these specific areas.

Investor penetration rates are exceptionally high, with several zip codes seeing landlords own the majority of SFR housing. Zip code 81126 has the highest rate at 88.2%, followed by 81138 at 85.7%.

The top regions by property count also exhibit high ownership rates, including 81152 (78.2%), 81123 (71.8%), and 81133 (69.3%), indicating deep saturation in core investment zones.

This data reveals a market where investor activity is not evenly distributed but is instead intensely focused on a few key micro-markets within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Landlords were strong net buyers in 2025 before activity froze, with a 7x buy-to-sell ratio for the year.
Detailed Findings

Throughout 2025, landlords in Costilla County were consistently net buyers, aggressively expanding their portfolios before market activity ceased. For the year, they purchased 21 properties while only selling 3, a buy-to-sell ratio of 7 to 1.

This acquisitive trend was evident in Q3 2025, when landlords bought 11 properties and sold only 2, resulting in a net gain of 9 properties for the quarter.

The pattern was similar in Q2 2025, with 4 properties purchased against just 1 sold, demonstrating sustained buying pressure through the middle of the year.

There is no transaction data for institutional investors (1000+ tier), as they have no presence in the county, meaning all historical activity is driven by small landlords.

The abrupt shift from being strong net buyers to zero activity in Q4 suggests a significant change in market conditions or investor sentiment at the end of the year.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
The landlord transaction market completely froze in Q4 2025, with zero properties bought or sold.
Detailed Findings

Q4 2025 marked a total cessation of investor transaction activity in Costilla County, with 0 properties bought or sold by landlords.

Consequently, landlords accounted for 0.0% of the total 0 transactions that occurred in the SFR market during this period.

The market freeze was comprehensive, affecting all segments of the investor community. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) recorded 0 transactions.

There was no inter-landlord trading, with 0% of the (nonexistent) purchases coming from other landlords.

This data points to a market in a state of pause, with neither acquisitions nor dispositions occurring among the entire investor base as the year concluded.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Control 100% of Costilla County's Investor Market Amid a Complete Q4 Activity Freeze
Holdings
Landlords own 1,139 Single-Family Residential properties, a commanding 72.8% of the market in Costilla County. The ownership is dominated by individual investors, who hold 999 of these properties (87.7%).
Pricing
Landlord pricing against homeowners proved highly volatile in 2025, swinging from a 32.9% discount in Q2 to a 68.4% premium in Q3, with no transactions in Q4 to establish a current trend.
Activity
Investor purchasing activity halted entirely in Q4 2025, with landlords making 0 purchases and accounting for 0.0% of market sales. This follows an active year where no new landlords entered the market in the final quarter.
Market Share
The investor market share is exclusively held by small landlords, with mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) controlling 100.0% of all investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (1000+) have zero presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 3-5 property tier (51.6%) and solidify their control in the 6-10 property tier (90.0%).
Transactions
While landlords were strong net buyers for the year with a 7.0x buy/sell ratio (21 buys vs 3 sells), all transaction activity ceased in Q4. Institutional investors recorded no transactions.
Market Narrative

The investor market in Costilla County, CO, is uniquely defined by its complete domination by small-scale operators and a high overall market penetration. Investors own a remarkable 72.8% of all single-family homes, totaling 1,139 properties. This landscape is exclusively shaped by 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who control 100% of the investor-owned housing. Individual investors hold the vast majority of these properties (87.7%), with institutional-scale firms entirely absent from the market.

Investor behavior in 2025 was characterized by aggressive acquisition followed by an abrupt halt. Landlords acted as decisive net buyers throughout the first three quarters, accumulating 21 properties while selling only 3. However, this momentum ceased entirely in Q4 2025, which saw zero purchases or sales by any investor type. Pricing behavior was erratic, with landlords paying significant premiums in some quarters and securing deep discounts in others, indicating a lack of consistent purchasing strategy against traditional homeowners.

The key takeaway from Costilla County is a housing market deeply influenced by a large base of small, individual investors who, after a year of expansion, have collectively paused their activity. This freeze in Q4 could signal a response to changing local economic conditions, a lack of available inventory, or a shift in investor sentiment. The high concentration of ownership within specific zip codes like 81126 (88.2% investor-owned) suggests these micro-markets are particularly sensitive to the decisions of this homogenous investor group.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 10, 2026 at 06:03 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCostilla (CO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price