DeKalb (AL) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the DeKalb (AL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in DeKalb (AL)
18,394
Total Investors in DeKalb (AL)
2,895
Investor Owned SFR in DeKalb (AL)
2,419(13.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,656
SFR Owned
2,105
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
239
SFR Owned
322
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,419 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate DeKalb County's Rental Market, Controlling 95.1% of Properties
The DeKalb County single-family rental market is fundamentally driven by small, individual investors who own 95.1% of the 2,419 investor-held properties. In Q4 2025, these landlords acquired 19.0% of homes sold, securing a 10.9% discount compared to homeowners, with institutional investors remaining completely absent from the market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 2,419 SFRs in DeKalb County, with individuals controlling a dominant 87.0% share.
Cash purchases dominate the investor landscape, with 2,119 properties (87.6%) owned outright compared to just 300 financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 95.7% (2,315 properties) classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a 10.9% discount in Q4, paying $194,559 versus homeowners' $218,415.
This Q4 discount marks a significant reversal from the rest of 2025, where landlords paid premiums of 6.3% to 26.9% above homeowner prices. This suggests a potential shift in purchasing strategy or market conditions at year-end.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 19.0% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, purchasing 15 of the 79 homes available.
Mom-and-pop investors were the only active landlord buyers, accounting for 100.0% of all investor purchases. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) made zero acquisitions in DeKalb County this quarter, while 19 new landlords entered the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate, controlling 95.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.
In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.2% (5 properties). Single-property landlords alone make up the market's backbone, holding 74.6% of all investor-owned housing.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners in the 11-20 property tier, holding an 85.7% share of properties in that segment.
Individual investors dominate portfolios under 10 properties, holding over 69% in each of those tiers. Interestingly, after companies take a brief lead, individuals regain a 57.3% majority in the 21-50 property tier, showing their persistence even in larger portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is highly concentrated in specific zip codes, reaching 50.0% in 35959.
The zip code 35984 also shows significant investor penetration with a 32.4% ownership rate. In contrast, several zip codes like 35950, 35954, and 35956 show no recorded investor-owned properties, highlighting a hyper-local investment focus.
Historical Transactions
Historical transaction data, including buy/sell ratios and inter-landlord trades, is not available for DeKalb County.
Analysis of long-term transaction trends, such as net buyer/seller status and price margins, could not be completed due to the absence of historical data.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 17.1% of Q4 transactions, accounting for 20 of 117 total market activities.
All 20 transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors, with zero activity from institutions. Notably, 0% of landlord purchases came from other landlords, indicating they are acquiring stock from homeowners or new construction.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 2,419 SFRs in DeKalb County, with individuals controlling a dominant 87.0% share.
Detailed Findings

Landlords have a significant presence in DeKalb County, owning 2,419 single-family properties, which constitutes 13.2% of the total 18,394 SFRs in the market.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly tilted towards individual investors, who own 2,105 properties (87.0%), while companies hold the remaining 322 properties (13.3%).

This individual dominance is even more pronounced when looking at the number of landlords; of the 2,895 distinct investors, 2,656 (91.7%) are individuals, compared to just 239 companies.

A defining characteristic of this market is the low reliance on financing. A staggering 87.6% of investor-owned properties (2,119) are owned with cash, while only 300 (12.4%) are financed.

The portfolio's primary purpose is clear, with 2,315 properties (95.7%) being rented or otherwise non-owner-occupied, highlighting their crucial role in the local rental housing supply.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a 10.9% discount in Q4, paying $194,559 versus homeowners' $218,415.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated sharp acquisition tactics, paying an average price of $194,559, which is 10.9% less than the $218,415 paid by traditional homeowners—a cash advantage of $23,856 per property.

This year-end discount represents a dramatic reversal of the trend seen in the first three quarters of 2025. Landlords paid premiums over homeowners in Q3 (+6.3%), Q2 (+26.9%), and Q1 (+6.7%), signaling a much more competitive environment earlier in the year.

The peak of this competitive bidding occurred in Q2 2025, when landlords paid an average of $245,833, a remarkable $52,035 more than homeowners, highlighting a period of intense demand from investors.

Despite quarterly fluctuations, the long-term price trend is upward. The Q4 2025 landlord acquisition price is 14.6% higher than the average price during the 2020-2023 period ($169,723).

Year-over-year price appreciation is also evident, with the Q4 2025 average price of $194,559 rising 9.0% from the $178,507 seen in Q4 2024, indicating sustained market heating.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 19.0% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, purchasing 15 of the 79 homes available.
Detailed Findings

Investors maintained a strong presence in the DeKalb County market during Q4 2025, purchasing 15 of the 79 single-family homes sold and capturing a 19.0% market share.

The entirety of this purchasing activity (100.0%) was driven by 'mom-and-pop' landlords, specifically those in the one and two-property tiers, underscoring the hyper-local and small-scale nature of investment.

The quarter was defined by new market entrants. Nineteen new entities made their first investment purchase, acquiring 14 properties and accounting for 93.3% of all investor buying activity.

In stark contrast, large-scale institutional investors were completely absent from the market, making zero acquisitions in Q4. This reinforces that local market dynamics are not influenced by national corporate buyers.

Beyond the wave of new entrants, buying activity was minimal, with only one transaction recorded by an investor expanding their portfolio to two properties. This highlights a market focused on entry rather than aggressive expansion by existing players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate, controlling 95.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in DeKalb County is unequivocally controlled by small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) holding a commanding 95.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of this market, collectively owning 1,878 properties. This single tier accounts for 74.6% of the entire investor portfolio, showing the market's deep reliance on new and small-scale landlords.

The narrative of a corporate takeover does not apply here, as institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a nearly invisible presence. Their portfolio of just 5 properties represents a mere 0.2% of the investor market share.

Mid-size landlords (owning 11-1,000 properties) constitute a very small segment of the market, together owning only 118 properties, or 4.9% of the investor-owned housing stock.

Ownership is heavily concentrated at the smallest scale. The top two tiers alone (landlords with 1 or 2 properties) command a combined 81.3% of the entire portfolio, demonstrating a market built by independent, local investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners in the 11-20 property tier, holding an 85.7% share of properties in that segment.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across all smaller portfolio sizes, controlling 91.8% of single-property investments and maintaining a share of over 83% in the 2-5 property range.

The transition to a more corporate structure first occurs in the 11-20 property tier (Tier 05), where companies own 18 properties and hold a decisive 85.7% majority share.

In a surprising pattern that defies a simple linear progression, individual investors reclaim the majority in the next largest tier. In the 21-50 property segment, individuals own 43 properties (57.3%), proving that scaling is not exclusive to corporate entities.

While individuals remain a powerful force, the share of company ownership generally increases with portfolio size. Company ownership grows from just 8.2% in the single-property tier to 30.4% in the 6-10 property tier.

The data reveals a blended market where both individuals and companies scale successfully. The resurgence of individual ownership in mid-size tiers suggests that incorporation is a choice, not a necessity, for building a larger SFR portfolio in DeKalb County.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is highly concentrated in specific zip codes, reaching 50.0% in 35959.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in DeKalb County is not evenly distributed but is instead intensely focused on specific geographic pockets, indicating targeted acquisition strategies rather than broad market participation.

The 35959 zip code emerges as a primary hub for investment, with landlords owning 50.0% of all single-family residential properties, the highest concentration in the county.

Another key area for investors is the 35984 zip code, where the landlord ownership rate is 32.4%, marking it as a significant sub-market for rental housing.

This concentration is contrasted by several zip codes—including 35950, 35954, and 35956—that have no recorded investor-owned SFRs, underscoring the hyper-localized nature of investment decisions.

The 35967 zip code presents a balanced profile of high volume and significant penetration, with 611 investor-owned properties and a 12.8% ownership rate, positioning it as a core rental market in DeKalb County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Historical transaction data, including buy/sell ratios and inter-landlord trades, is not available for DeKalb County.
Detailed Findings

Analysis of historical transaction patterns for landlords in DeKalb County could not be performed as the dataset was not available for this geography.

Key metrics such as the long-term buy-to-sell ratio, which indicates whether landlords are in a phase of net acquisition or disposition, are undetermined.

The degree of market liquidity, often measured by the percentage of transactions occurring between landlords, remains unknown.

Similarly, trends in transaction volume and pricing over time, including comparisons between average buy and sell prices, could not be established.

The specific transaction behavior of institutional investors versus the broader landlord market also could not be analyzed due to the lack of available data.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 17.1% of Q4 transactions, accounting for 20 of 117 total market activities.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a significant force in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 20 of the 117 total SFR transactions, which translates to a 17.1% share of all market activity (buys and sells).

The transaction activity was driven exclusively by mom-and-pop investors. Landlords in the smallest tiers (1-2 properties) were responsible for all 20 transactions, while institutional investors remained on the sidelines.

Pricing for new entrants was robust, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) paying an average of $195,220 for their acquisitions.

A key finding is the complete lack of inter-landlord trading. Zero percent of investor purchases were sourced from other landlords, showing that investors are acquiring properties from the traditional homeowner market rather than trading existing rental stock.

The transaction data strongly reinforces the theme of market entry. With 19 of 20 transactions occurring in the single-property tier, Q4 activity was clearly defined by a new wave of investors rather than portfolio expansion by established players.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors control 95.1% of DeKalb County's rental homes as new landlords drive Q4 acquisitions.
Holdings
In DeKalb County, landlords own 2,419 SFR properties, representing 13.2% of the market. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who hold 2,105 properties (87.0%), compared to 322 (13.3%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Landlords demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage in Q4 2025, paying an average of $194,559 per property—a 10.9% discount ($23,856) compared to the $218,415 paid by traditional homeowners.
Activity
Investors purchased 19.0% of homes sold in Q4 (15 properties), with activity driven entirely by small landlords. The market welcomed 19 new single-property investors, signaling fresh interest in local real estate.
Market Share
The market structure is defined by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 95.1% of investor housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) hold a marginal 0.2% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners across most portfolio sizes. Companies first achieve a majority share (85.7%) in the 11-20 property tier, though individuals surprisingly regain the majority in the next tier up.
Transactions
Based on Q4 activity, landlords are net buyers, acquiring 14 properties and likely selling 6 for a buy-to-sell ratio of 2.3x. Institutional investors were completely inactive, with zero buys or sells recorded.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in DeKalb County, Alabama, is overwhelmingly shaped by local, small-scale investors, not large corporations. Landlords own 2,419 SFR properties, comprising 13.2% of the county's total housing stock. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of individuals, who own 87.0% of these homes. The market structure analysis reveals that 'mom-and-pop' landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control a commanding 95.1% of all investor-owned real estate, while institutional investors have a negligible footprint at just 0.2%.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was characterized by strategic acquisitions and new market entries. Landlords purchased 19.0% of all homes sold during the quarter, and did so with a significant financial advantage, paying 10.9% less than traditional homeowners. Activity was exclusively driven by mom-and-pop investors, including 19 new landlords who purchased their first rental property. The complete absence of institutional buying, combined with a lack of inter-landlord trading, indicates that growth is coming from new capital acquiring properties from the traditional housing market.

The key takeaway from DeKalb County is the resilience and dominance of the individual investor. The market is not undergoing a corporate takeover; instead, it is being steadily built by community members and small operators who rely on cash-heavy financing and targeted, local knowledge. The influx of new landlords in Q4 signals continued confidence in the local rental market, reinforcing a stable and decentralized ownership landscape that stands in contrast to national narratives of institutional consolidation.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 09, 2026 at 11:11 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyDeKalb (AL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail