Conecuh (AL) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Conecuh (AL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Conecuh (AL)
2,763
Total Investors in Conecuh (AL)
696
Investor Owned SFR in Conecuh (AL)
637(23.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
644
SFR Owned
554
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
52
SFR Owned
83
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 637 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Conecuh County's investor market is dominated by small, individual landlords and saw zero transaction activity in Q4 2025.
Investors own 637 SFR properties, representing 23.1% of the market in Conecuh County. Ownership is overwhelmingly concentrated among 'mom-and-pop' landlords (92.8%), with individuals owning 87.0% of the investor portfolio. The market was static in Q4 2025, with no recorded investor purchase or sale transactions.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 637 SFR properties, with individuals holding a dominant 87.0% share.
The portfolio is almost entirely owned outright, with 98.9% of properties held in cash (630 properties) versus just 1.1% financed (7 properties). The rental focus is clear, with 628 properties classified as rented. Individual landlords (644) vastly outnumber company landlords (52) by more than 12-to-1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No landlord purchase activity was recorded in Q4 2025, preventing price comparison.
There were no recorded landlord acquisitions in Q4 2025, Q3 2025, or Q2 2025. This lack of recent transaction data makes it impossible to compare landlord and homeowner pricing or analyze pricing trends for the period.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 0.0% of homes sold in Q4 2025, as no purchases were recorded.
With zero total purchases, both mom-and-pop (Tiers 01-04) and institutional (Tier 09) investors were completely inactive this quarter. Consequently, no new landlords entered the market in Q4 2025.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 92.8% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own a staggering 78.2% of all investor-held properties. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence in Conecuh County. No recent pricing data is available by tier due to a lack of transactions.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority property owners in every active tier in Conecuh County.
Unlike in many markets, there is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners; individuals dominate even the 3-5 property tier with a 78.2% share. Companies own a total of 83 properties, compared to 554 for individuals.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 36401 holding 461 properties.
The 36401 zip code alone accounts for 72.4% of all investor-owned properties in Conecuh County. While some smaller zip codes have higher investor ownership rates, such as 36471 at 40.0%, their total property count is minimal.
Historical Transactions
No historical transaction data is available, preventing analysis of net buyer status.
There are no recorded buy or sell transactions for landlords in any of the observed timeframes. This prevents any analysis of buy/sell ratios, landlord-to-landlord activity, or price comparisons between acquisitions and dispositions.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 0.0% of Q4 2025 transactions due to zero market activity.
No transactions were recorded for any investor tier in Q4, from mom-and-pop to institutional. This lack of activity prevents any analysis of pricing strategies or inter-landlord trading for the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 637 SFR properties, with individuals holding a dominant 87.0% share.
Detailed Findings

In Conecuh County, landlords own a significant 637 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, making up 23.1% of the total 2,763 SFRs in the market.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly controlled by individual 'mom-and-pop' owners rather than corporations. Individuals own 554 properties, constituting 87.0% of the entire investor-owned portfolio, compared to just 83 properties (13.0%) owned by companies.

A defining characteristic of this market is the near-total reliance on cash purchases. An overwhelming 98.9% of investor-owned properties (630) are owned free and clear, with only 7 properties (1.1%) carrying financing, suggesting a fiscally conservative and low-leverage investor base.

The number of individual landlord entities (644) dwarfs the number of company entities (52), a ratio of over 12 to 1. This reinforces that the market is driven by small-scale, local investment, not large-scale corporate operations.

The primary strategy for these holdings is rental income, with 628 of the 637 properties identified as rented, underscoring the high rental penetration within the investor-owned housing stock in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No landlord purchase activity was recorded in Q4 2025, preventing price comparison.
Detailed Findings

The investor acquisition market in Conecuh County was completely dormant in the latter half of 2025. Data shows zero properties were purchased by landlords in Q4 2025, making a direct price comparison to traditional homeowners impossible for this period.

This lack of activity extends back through the previous two quarters, with no recorded landlord purchases in Q3 or Q2 of 2025. This signals a significant pause or halt in investor buying activity within the county.

Historical data for the 2020-2023 period also indicates minimal to no purchasing, with zero properties acquired at the recorded average price of $72,938. This suggests that the current market freeze is not an anomaly but rather an extension of very low long-term investor acquisition volume.

Without transaction data, it is not possible to calculate any price gap between landlords and homeowners or determine if one group pays more than the other in this specific market.

The absence of purchasing velocity is the most critical finding, pointing to a stable, hold-oriented market where investors are not actively expanding their portfolios through new acquisitions.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords acquired 0.0% of homes sold in Q4 2025, as no purchases were recorded.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing in Conecuh County came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025. Landlords made zero SFR purchases, accounting for 0.0% of the total market activity for the quarter.

This inactivity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who dominate ownership in the county, recorded zero purchases.

Likewise, mid-size and institutional investors were also absent from the market, with zero properties acquired by any tier in Q4.

The lack of purchasing by single-property investors (Tier 01) indicates that no new landlords entered the Conecuh County market during this period, a sign of either market saturation, lack of inventory, or unattractive pricing for new entrants.

The complete absence of acquisition activity highlights a market focused on holding existing assets rather than expansion, contrasting sharply with more dynamic national trends.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 92.8% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Conecuh County is the domain of the small landlord. Mom-and-pop investors (owning 1-10 properties) command a massive 92.8% of all investor-owned SFRs, totaling 596 properties across Tiers 01-04.

First-time or single-holding investors (Tier 01) form the bedrock of this market, owning 502 properties. This represents 78.2% of the entire investor portfolio, the highest concentration in any single tier.

Mid-size investors have a minor presence, with Tiers 05-08 (11-1000 properties) collectively owning just 46 properties, or 7.2% of the landlord-owned housing stock.

Institutional capital is entirely absent from this market. Tier 09 investors (1000+ properties) own zero properties, underscoring the county's insulation from large-scale corporate real estate investment.

Due to the lack of recent purchasing activity, it is not possible to analyze acquisition price trends by tier for Q4 or other recent periods.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority property owners in every active tier in Conecuh County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain majority control across every single ownership tier in Conecuh County, a clear signal of a market driven by personal holdings, not corporate structures.

In the largest and most active tier, single-property landlords, individuals own 461 properties (91.8%) compared to just 41 for companies (8.2%).

Even as portfolio sizes increase, individuals remain dominant. In the 3-5 property tier, individuals own 43 properties (78.2%), and in the 21-50 property tier, they own all 28 properties (100.0%).

There is no 'crossover point' in this market. At no portfolio size do companies overtake individuals as the primary owners, reinforcing the local, non-corporate nature of real estate investment here.

The data on purchasing inactivity means there is no basis for comparing acquisition prices between individual and company buyers within these tiers for any recent period.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 36401 holding 461 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlord ownership in Conecuh County is geographically concentrated in the 36401 zip code, which contains 461 investor-owned properties. This single area represents 72.4% of the entire county's landlord portfolio.

The top three zip codes by property count (36401, 36432, and 36475) collectively hold 588 properties, or 92.3% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county, indicating a highly localized investment strategy.

While 36401 leads in volume, other zip codes exhibit higher market penetration rates. For instance, zip code 36471 has the highest rate with 40.0% of its SFRs being investor-owned, though this represents a very small number of homes.

Similarly, 36033 (31.2% rate) and 36473 (25.0% rate) show high investor saturation, demonstrating that while investment is concentrated by volume in one area, the impact of investors is felt at high percentages in several smaller communities.

This highlights a key distinction between where most investor properties *are* (count) and where their presence is most concentrated relative to the local housing stock (percentage).

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
No historical transaction data is available, preventing analysis of net buyer status.
Detailed Findings

A complete lack of historical transaction data for landlords in Conecuh County makes it impossible to determine long-term market dynamics. There are no recorded buy or sell transactions across any timeframe provided.

Without this data, key metrics such as the buy/sell ratio cannot be calculated. It is not possible to determine whether landlords have historically been net buyers or net sellers in this market.

Analysis of inter-landlord trading is also not possible. The data does not show any instances of landlords buying from or selling to other landlords, which would typically indicate market liquidity and portfolio churn.

Similarly, institutional investor (1000+ tier) transaction patterns cannot be assessed, as this tier has no presence or recorded activity in the county.

The primary insight from the lack of data is that Conecuh County appears to be a highly illiquid, buy-and-hold market for real estate investors, with minimal to no transactional churn over time.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 0.0% of Q4 2025 transactions due to zero market activity.
Detailed Findings

The real estate transaction market for investors in Conecuh County was frozen in Q4 2025, with zero transactions recorded. This gives landlords a 0.0% share of all market transactions for the period.

This inactivity was consistent across all investor sizes. The typically dominant mom-and-pop tiers (01-04) recorded zero transactions, showing that small landlords were not buying or selling.

Mid-size and large investors were also completely on the sidelines, with no recorded transactions, reinforcing the market-wide halt in investor activity.

As a result of zero purchases, there is no data to compare average purchase prices across different tiers, which would normally reveal insights into the buying strategies of smaller versus larger investors.

Furthermore, the data shows no inter-landlord trading activity. No investors purchased properties from other landlords, suggesting a lack of portfolio repositioning or churn within the existing investor community during Q4.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Dominated by small landlords, Conecuh County's cash-heavy investor market saw zero new acquisitions in Q4 2025.
Holdings
In Conecuh County, landlords own 637 SFR properties, representing 23.1% of the market. Individual investors hold a commanding 554 of these properties (87.0%), with companies owning the remaining 83 (13.0%).
Pricing
No landlord purchases were recorded in Q4 2025, making a price comparison against traditional homeowners impossible and indicating a dormant acquisitions market.
Activity
Investor purchase activity was nonexistent in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0 properties (0.0% of sales) and no new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 92.8% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have no presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every active portfolio tier, from single-property (91.8% individual) to 21-50 properties (100.0% individual), meaning a corporate crossover point does not exist.
Transactions
With zero recorded buy or sell transactions in Q4 2025, landlords were neither net buyers nor net sellers, reflecting a completely static and illiquid market for investor-held properties.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Conecuh County, Alabama, is a closed ecosystem dominated by small, local participants. Investors own 637 single-family homes, comprising 23.1% of the county's total SFR stock. This landscape is overwhelmingly shaped by individuals, who own 87.0% of the portfolio, compared to just 13.0% for companies. The market structure is definitively bottom-heavy, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 92.8% of investor housing, while large-scale institutional capital is entirely absent.

Investor behavior in Conecuh County is characterized by a buy-and-hold strategy funded by cash, not leverage. An extraordinary 98.9% of investor properties are owned outright without financing. This conservative approach is mirrored in the market's recent activity, which was nonexistent in the fourth quarter of 2025. There were zero recorded purchases or sales by any investor type, indicating a frozen market where landlords are holding assets rather than transacting. This lack of activity prevents any pricing analysis against traditional homeowners.

The key takeaway for Conecuh County is its stability and insulation from broader, more volatile real estate trends. It is a mature rental market where existing individual landlords provide housing stock with little to no new investor entry or corporate influence. The complete halt in Q4 transactions suggests that growth is not the current priority; rather, the focus is on managing existing, cash-owned portfolios. This makes it a predictable but illiquid environment, starkly different from high-growth, institutionally active markets elsewhere in the country.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 09, 2026 at 11:07 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyConecuh (AL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price