Bibb (AL) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Bibb (AL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Bibb (AL)
3,155
Total Investors in Bibb (AL)
766
Investor Owned SFR in Bibb (AL)
561(17.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
714
SFR Owned
496
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
52
SFR Owned
69
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 561 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop investors define the Bibb County rental market, owning 97.9% of properties while paying premiums over homeowners.
In Bibb County, investors own 17.8% of SFRs (561 properties), with small, individual landlords controlling the vast majority (97.9%). In Q4, these landlords defied norms by paying a 1.8% premium over homeowners and were strong net buyers, signaling continued confidence and accumulation in the local market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 561 SFR properties in Bibb County, with individual investors holding a dominant 88.4% share.
Cash purchases overwhelmingly dominate investor portfolios, with 476 properties (84.8%) owned outright compared to just 85 that are financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, as 549 of 561 properties (97.9%) are non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Defying national trends, investors in Bibb County paid a 1.8% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $239,513 per property.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been highly volatile, swinging from a 24.0% landlord premium in Q3 to a 5.6% discount in Q2. Price appreciation is evident, with the 2024 average landlord price of $275,984 far exceeding the $146,905 average during the 2020-2023 period.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 21.2% of all single-family homes sold in Q4, purchasing 7 of the 33 properties on the market.
Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for 100.0% of all landlord purchases in Q4. Small investors completely dominated activity with 7 purchases, while institutional investors made zero acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control Bibb County's rental market, owning 97.9% of all investor SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just 5 properties, or 0.9% of the investor-owned market. These institutions made zero purchases in Q4, indicating they are not actively expanding in the county.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors own 94.4% of single-property rentals, but companies take majority control in the 2-property (85.7%) and 6-10 property (55.0%) tiers.
Price data by owner type is not available for Bibb County. Given that 100% of Q4 purchases were by mom-and-pop landlords, growth is currently concentrated among smaller, often individual, investors.
Geographic Distribution
The highest concentration of investor properties is in zip codes 35042, with 175 SFRs, and 35184, with 145 SFRs.
The highest investor ownership rate is found in zip code 35074, where investors own 50.0% of the housing stock. This reveals a divergence between where investors own the most properties versus where they have the highest market penetration.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Bibb County are strong net buyers, acquiring 9 properties while selling only 2 in Q4 2025.
The pace of acquisitions has slowed, as the 51 purchases in 2025 mark a 37% decrease from the 81 purchases made in 2024. No data was available on landlord-to-landlord transactions or institutional activity.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 20.9% of all Q4 property transactions, accounting for 9 of the 43 total sales in Bibb County.
No investors purchased from other landlords in Q4, with 0.0% of transactions being inter-landlord trades. First-time or single-property investors were most active, paying an average price of $255,871.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 561 SFR properties in Bibb County, with individual investors holding a dominant 88.4% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors own a significant 561 single-family properties in Bibb County, accounting for 17.8% of the total 3,155 SFRs in the market.

The ownership landscape is overwhelmingly composed of small-scale investors, with individuals owning 496 properties (88.4%) compared to just 69 (12.3%) owned by companies.

This granular structure is reflected in the entity count, where 714 individual landlords far outnumber the 52 company landlords, a ratio of nearly 14-to-1.

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for all-cash ownership. Investors hold 476 properties outright, representing 84.8% of their portfolios, while only 85 properties are financed.

The investor portfolio is clearly geared towards generating rental income, with 549 of the 561 properties (97.9%) classified as rented or non-owner-occupied.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Defying national trends, investors in Bibb County paid a 1.8% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $239,513 per property.
Detailed Findings

In a direct reversal of typical market dynamics, landlords in Bibb County paid more than traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, with an average acquisition price of $239,513 versus the homeowner average of $235,245—a 1.8% premium.

This premium-paying behavior was even more pronounced in the prior quarter (Q3 2025), when landlords paid a staggering 24.0% more than homeowners, a difference of $45,923 per property.

The relationship between landlord and homeowner pricing has been notably inconsistent, shifting from a 5.6% landlord discount in Q2 2025 to significant premiums in the subsequent quarters.

A major outlier in Q1 2025, where the average landlord price hit $699,941, suggests a single high-value transaction skewed the quarterly average, highlighting potential data volatility in smaller markets.

Despite quarterly fluctuations, a clear long-term price appreciation trend is visible, with average prices in 2024 ($275,984) and 2025 ($418,234) substantially higher than the 2020-2023 average of $146,905.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 21.2% of all single-family homes sold in Q4, purchasing 7 of the 33 properties on the market.
Detailed Findings

Landlords captured a significant portion of the Bibb County market in Q4 2025, purchasing 7 of the 33 total SFRs sold, which represents a 21.2% market share.

The entirety of this quarterly investor activity was driven by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who accounted for 100% of all properties acquired by investors.

New market entrants were a powerful force, with 8 new single-property landlords acquiring 6 homes, making up 85.7% of all investor purchases for the quarter.

The market for larger investors was completely dormant, as mid-size and institutional landlords (those with portfolios of 11 or more properties) made zero acquisitions in Q4.

This activity underscores a market heavily skewed towards small-scale, local investment rather than large, corporate-driven acquisitions.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control Bibb County's rental market, owning 97.9% of all investor SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Bibb County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 97.9% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

Single-property landlords alone form the bedrock of the rental market, owning 497 properties, which accounts for 87.3% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) maintain a minimal footprint, owning just 5 properties, or 0.9% of the local investor-owned housing stock.

The entire segment of mid-to-large investors (those holding 11 to 1,000 properties) is also very small, collectively owning only 7 properties, which represents just 1.2% of the market.

This distribution pattern reveals that local rental housing is provided by a large number of individual investors, not by large-scale corporations.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors own 94.4% of single-property rentals, but companies take majority control in the 2-property (85.7%) and 6-10 property (55.0%) tiers.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners in the market's largest segment, the single-property tier, controlling 473 properties for a 94.4% share.

A surprising crossover point occurs early in portfolio scaling: companies become the dominant owner type in the two-property tier, holding 6 of the 7 properties (85.7%).

This non-linear pattern continues as individuals regain a majority in the 3-5 property tier (60.6%), only for companies to again become the majority owner in the 6-10 property tier (55.0%).

This suggests a strategic divergence where individuals often hold a single investment property, while those who scale further frequently choose to incorporate their holdings.

Despite company dominance in select small tiers, the sheer volume of single-property individual landlords ensures they control the vast majority of the overall market.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The highest concentration of investor properties is in zip codes 35042, with 175 SFRs, and 35184, with 145 SFRs.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Bibb County is geographically concentrated, with the zip code 35042 leading in sheer volume, holding 175 investor-owned properties at an 18.1% ownership rate.

Zip code 35184 also shows a significant cluster of investment, with 145 properties and a similar 19.0% ownership rate.

However, when analyzing market penetration, a different picture emerges. Zip code 35074 has the highest investor ownership rate, where landlords own half (50.0%) of all SFRs.

Other areas of high saturation include zip code 36793 (29.6% investor-owned) and 35034 (19.4%), both significantly above the county average of 17.8%.

The contrast between the top areas by property count and by ownership percentage suggests different market dynamics, with some smaller zip codes having extremely high investor saturation levels.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Bibb County are strong net buyers, acquiring 9 properties while selling only 2 in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Bibb County have been consistent and aggressive net buyers of property, a trend that continued in Q4 2025 with 9 properties purchased and only 2 sold.

This net buying behavior is a long-term pattern, evident from the full-year data showing 51 properties bought versus 15 sold in 2025, and an even stronger ratio of 81 bought versus 9 sold in 2024.

While accumulation continues, the pace has moderated. The 51 landlord purchases in 2025 represent a 37% decrease from the 81 purchases recorded in 2024, signaling a potential market cooldown.

The persistently high buy-to-sell ratio indicates a strong sentiment among local investors to acquire and hold rental properties for the long term rather than engaging in short-term flipping.

No transaction data was available for institutional (1000+ tier) investors, which aligns with their minimal ownership footprint and lack of purchasing activity in the county.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 20.9% of all Q4 property transactions, accounting for 9 of the 43 total sales in Bibb County.
Detailed Findings

Investors accounted for 20.9% of all single-family real estate transactions in Q4 2025, participating in 9 of the 43 market-wide sales.

This transaction activity was entirely driven by small investors, with 100% of the 9 landlord transactions being conducted by mom-and-pop tiers (1-10 properties).

New or single-property investors were the most active group, conducting 8 of the 9 transactions at an average purchase price of $255,871.

The market showed no signs of inter-landlord trading in Q4, as 0.0% of investor purchases came from other landlords, suggesting investors are acquiring their properties from the traditional homeowner market.

The complete absence of transactions by institutional investors further confirms their lack of active participation in the Bibb County market during this period.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Bibb County with 97.9% ownership as investors claim 17.8% of the housing market.
Holdings
Landlords own 561 SFR properties, representing 17.8% of Bibb County's market, with individual investors overwhelmingly holding 496 of those properties (88.4%).
Pricing
Reversing national trends, landlords paid a 1.8% premium over homeowners in Q4, with an average price of $239,513 compared to homeowners' $235,245.
Activity
Landlords purchased 21.2% of homes sold in Q4 (7 of 33), with activity driven by 8 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 97.9% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 0.9%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate the single-property tier (94.4% share), but companies surprisingly take majority control in the small two-property (85.7%) and 6-10 property (55.0%) tiers.
Transactions
Landlords remain strong net buyers, acquiring 9 properties and selling only 2 in Q4, continuing a multi-year trend of portfolio accumulation.
Market Narrative

In Bibb County, Alabama, investors hold a significant 17.8% of the single-family residential market, owning 561 of the 3,155 total properties. The market structure is overwhelmingly defined by small-scale participants; individual investors own 496 properties (88.4%), while companies hold just 69 (12.3%). This granular ownership is further confirmed by tier analysis, which shows mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a massive 97.9% of the investor-owned housing stock, while large institutional investors have a minimal presence with only 0.9%.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was characterized by active acquisition and atypical pricing. Landlords purchased 21.2% of all homes sold, with this activity driven exclusively by mom-and-pop buyers, including 8 new landlords entering the market. Uncharacteristically, these investors paid a 1.8% premium over traditional homeowners, averaging $239,513 per purchase. This trend of accumulation is consistent, as landlords were strong net buyers with 9 purchases versus only 2 sales in the quarter, reflecting a long-term hold strategy financed predominantly by cash (84.8% of holdings).

The key takeaway for the Bibb County housing market is its insulation from large-scale corporate investment and its reliance on local, individual capital. The dominance of mom-and-pop landlords suggests a stable, long-term rental market less susceptible to the rapid strategy shifts seen with institutional players. However, the trend of investors paying premiums could increase price competition for traditional homebuyers. The market's health and rental availability are directly tied to the financial stability and investment decisions of hundreds of small, local owners.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 09, 2026 at 11:00 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBibb (AL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail